Effect of thinning eucalyptus trees on soybean productivity in integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
M. Behling, A. L. D. Souza, A. Lange, D. Camargo, Jonas Fallgatter, G. Barreto
{"title":"Effect of thinning eucalyptus trees on soybean productivity in integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems","authors":"M. Behling, A. L. D. Souza, A. Lange, D. Camargo, Jonas Fallgatter, G. Barreto","doi":"10.1590/0103-8478cr20220202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of integrated crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF) systems and the thinning of eucalyptus trees on the agronomical performance of soybean. Treatments consisted of cultivation under: crops under full sunlight (CFS) conditions; ICLF with triple-row tree configuration (ICLFT) in which trees were submitted to selective thinning in the fifth year after planting through removal of 50% of trees while maintaining triple-row bands; and ICLF with single-row tree band configuration (ICLFS) in which the lateral rows of the triple-row tree bands were subjected to systematic thinning at the fourth year after planting. The physiological and agronomical variables of the soybean crop were evaluated at the R5 and R8 reproductive stages during the eighth harvesting season (2018/2019). Soybean sampling was carried out at five random positions in the CFS and in four transects at distances of 3, 6, 10 and 15 m from the tree bands in both the north and south faces of the ICLF systems. There were no differences between soybean grown under the ICLF and CFS systems with respect to specific leaf area, plant density, lodging index and mass of a thousand grains. However, the ICLF increased dry leaf mass and leaf area index and reduced soybean plant heights. Soybean productivity was reduced by 26% in ICLF-T and 14% in ICLF-S, that is, a 12% reduction in the productivity loss with systematic thinning. It is concluded that ICLF reduces soybean productivity in the effective grain production area of the system, regardless of the degree of thinning, although systematic thinning by removing the lateral tree lines to conversion of triple-rows into single-rows minimizes the loss of soybean grain yield.","PeriodicalId":10308,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia Rural","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia Rural","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20220202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of integrated crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF) systems and the thinning of eucalyptus trees on the agronomical performance of soybean. Treatments consisted of cultivation under: crops under full sunlight (CFS) conditions; ICLF with triple-row tree configuration (ICLFT) in which trees were submitted to selective thinning in the fifth year after planting through removal of 50% of trees while maintaining triple-row bands; and ICLF with single-row tree band configuration (ICLFS) in which the lateral rows of the triple-row tree bands were subjected to systematic thinning at the fourth year after planting. The physiological and agronomical variables of the soybean crop were evaluated at the R5 and R8 reproductive stages during the eighth harvesting season (2018/2019). Soybean sampling was carried out at five random positions in the CFS and in four transects at distances of 3, 6, 10 and 15 m from the tree bands in both the north and south faces of the ICLF systems. There were no differences between soybean grown under the ICLF and CFS systems with respect to specific leaf area, plant density, lodging index and mass of a thousand grains. However, the ICLF increased dry leaf mass and leaf area index and reduced soybean plant heights. Soybean productivity was reduced by 26% in ICLF-T and 14% in ICLF-S, that is, a 12% reduction in the productivity loss with systematic thinning. It is concluded that ICLF reduces soybean productivity in the effective grain production area of the system, regardless of the degree of thinning, although systematic thinning by removing the lateral tree lines to conversion of triple-rows into single-rows minimizes the loss of soybean grain yield.
间伐桉树对农林复合系统大豆生产力的影响
摘要/ ABSTRACT摘要:本研究旨在评价作物-畜禽-林业综合系统(ICLF)和桉树间伐对大豆农艺性能的影响。处理包括:在全日照条件下种植作物;三行树构型ICLFT (ICLFT),即在种植后第5年,在保留三行带的情况下,将50%的树木砍掉,进行选择性间伐;单行树带配置(ICLFS),即在种植后第四年对三行树带的侧行进行系统间伐。在第8个收获季节(2018/2019)的R5和R8生育阶段,对大豆作物的生理和农艺变量进行了评价。在ICLF系统南北面距离树带3、6、10和15 m的4个样带中,在CFS内的5个随机位置进行大豆取样。ICLF和CFS系统下大豆的比叶面积、密度、倒伏指数和千粒重均无显著差异。但ICLF增加了大豆干叶质量和叶面积指数,降低了大豆株高。ICLF-T和ICLF-S的大豆产量分别下降了26%和14%,即系统间伐减少了12%的生产力损失。综上所述,无论间伐程度如何,ICLF都会降低系统有效粮食生产区域的大豆产量,尽管通过去除侧树行以将三行转为单行的系统间伐可以最大限度地减少大豆产量的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia Rural
Ciencia Rural AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Ciência Rural is to publish the results of original research, note and reviews which contribute significantly to knowledge in Agricultural Sciences. Preference will be given to original articles that develop news concepts or experimental approaches and are not merely repositories of scientific data. The decison of acceptance for publication lies with the Editors and is based on the recommendations of Editorial Comission, Area Committee and/ or ad hoc reviewers. The editors and reviewers are external to the institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信