Budgetary Participation’s Antecedent of Information Asymmetry and its Outcomes

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Quang-Huy Ngo
{"title":"Budgetary Participation’s Antecedent of Information Asymmetry and its Outcomes","authors":"Quang-Huy Ngo","doi":"10.17576/ajag-2019-12-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to investigate the antecedents and outcomes of budgetary participation. More specifically, I propose that a lack of information fosters budgetary participation. A high degree of participation allows the managers to have a favourable attitude toward budget attained and in turn, this leads to a low degree of budgetary creation slack. The questionnaire data obtained from 115 Vietnamese managers was used to test the proposed model. The results suggest that highly asymmetric information demands high participative budgeting. When participating more in the budgeting process, the managers’ attitude toward the budget attained was favourable, and in turn, this leads to the decrease of budgetary slack creation. These findings contribute to the budgeting literature in a threefold manner. First, this study supports the argument that the demand for participation is high when there is highly asymmetric information. Second, the results suggest that the managers’ attitude toward the budget attained mediates the relationship between budgetary participation and the managers’ creation of budgetary slack. Third, by using the theory of planned behaviour, this study has explained how and why a favourable attitude toward the budget attained leads to the low creation of budgetary slack.","PeriodicalId":42796,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/ajag-2019-12-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the antecedents and outcomes of budgetary participation. More specifically, I propose that a lack of information fosters budgetary participation. A high degree of participation allows the managers to have a favourable attitude toward budget attained and in turn, this leads to a low degree of budgetary creation slack. The questionnaire data obtained from 115 Vietnamese managers was used to test the proposed model. The results suggest that highly asymmetric information demands high participative budgeting. When participating more in the budgeting process, the managers’ attitude toward the budget attained was favourable, and in turn, this leads to the decrease of budgetary slack creation. These findings contribute to the budgeting literature in a threefold manner. First, this study supports the argument that the demand for participation is high when there is highly asymmetric information. Second, the results suggest that the managers’ attitude toward the budget attained mediates the relationship between budgetary participation and the managers’ creation of budgetary slack. Third, by using the theory of planned behaviour, this study has explained how and why a favourable attitude toward the budget attained leads to the low creation of budgetary slack.
预算参与的信息不对称前提及其后果
本研究旨在探讨预算参与的前因与结果。更具体地说,我建议缺乏信息会促进预算参与。高度的参与使管理人员对所获预算有良好的态度,反过来,这导致低程度的预算创造懈怠。从115名越南管理人员中获得的问卷数据被用来检验所提出的模型。结果表明,信息高度不对称要求高参与性预算。当管理者更多地参与预算编制过程时,他们对获得的预算的态度是有利的,这反过来又导致预算松弛的产生减少。这些发现以三种方式对预算文献作出贡献。首先,本研究支持信息高度不对称时参与需求高的观点。第二,管理者对预算的态度在预算参与与管理者预算松弛之间起中介作用。第三,通过使用计划行为理论,本研究解释了对已获得预算的有利态度如何以及为什么导致预算松弛的低产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信