MAKING THEM STRONG? VULNERABILITY, CAPABILITIES AND RESILIENCE IN POOR CHILDREN

IF 0.1
A. Bagattini, Rebecca Gutwald
{"title":"MAKING THEM STRONG? VULNERABILITY, CAPABILITIES AND RESILIENCE IN POOR CHILDREN","authors":"A. Bagattini, Rebecca Gutwald","doi":"10.18351/2179-7137/GED.V5N3P194-220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of our paper consists in establishing the idea that the negative consequences that result from child poverty can be mitigated if the government and social workers promote the resilience of poor children. We use Amartya Sen’s capability approach as an evaluative framework to argue for this thesis. By distinguishing different sources of vulnerability we assume that children are inherently vulnerable, because they are dependent and in need of care. Poor children are, however, even more vulnerable in specific ways. Following Catriona MacKenzie, we call these vulnerabilities “pathogenetic”; they are caused by social arrangements like institutional settings. We claim that at least some some of those vulnerabilities can and should be diminished by promoting children’s resilience. We proceed in three steps. In the first part of the paper, we develop our concept of vulnerability and explain how child poverty renders children vulnerable to specific harms. Here we also introduce the capability approach by asking which capabilities children need for coping with this situation. In part two we argue that the concept of resilience helps us to understand why capabilities (and not resources or abilities) are relevant for coping with the adverse effects of child poverty. We claim that promoting the capabilities of children is a matter of justice, and that implementing resilience is, too. It is also highly important to see that promoting resilience is mainly a social matter, not a task the individual child has to fulfil on its own. Hence, we argue that children are entitled to gain those capabilities that promote their resilience against the adverse effects of poverty. In part three we discuss several difficulties of our account, such as the danger that children will be burdened with coping with the effects of poverty instead of society fighting poverty.","PeriodicalId":42602,"journal":{"name":"Revista Genero & Direito","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Genero & Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18351/2179-7137/GED.V5N3P194-220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The main purpose of our paper consists in establishing the idea that the negative consequences that result from child poverty can be mitigated if the government and social workers promote the resilience of poor children. We use Amartya Sen’s capability approach as an evaluative framework to argue for this thesis. By distinguishing different sources of vulnerability we assume that children are inherently vulnerable, because they are dependent and in need of care. Poor children are, however, even more vulnerable in specific ways. Following Catriona MacKenzie, we call these vulnerabilities “pathogenetic”; they are caused by social arrangements like institutional settings. We claim that at least some some of those vulnerabilities can and should be diminished by promoting children’s resilience. We proceed in three steps. In the first part of the paper, we develop our concept of vulnerability and explain how child poverty renders children vulnerable to specific harms. Here we also introduce the capability approach by asking which capabilities children need for coping with this situation. In part two we argue that the concept of resilience helps us to understand why capabilities (and not resources or abilities) are relevant for coping with the adverse effects of child poverty. We claim that promoting the capabilities of children is a matter of justice, and that implementing resilience is, too. It is also highly important to see that promoting resilience is mainly a social matter, not a task the individual child has to fulfil on its own. Hence, we argue that children are entitled to gain those capabilities that promote their resilience against the adverse effects of poverty. In part three we discuss several difficulties of our account, such as the danger that children will be burdened with coping with the effects of poverty instead of society fighting poverty.
让他们变得强壮?贫困儿童的脆弱性、能力和复原力
我们论文的主要目的在于建立这样一种观点,即如果政府和社会工作者促进贫困儿童的适应能力,就可以减轻儿童贫困带来的负面后果。我们使用Amartya Sen的能力方法作为评估框架来论证本文。通过区分不同的脆弱来源,我们假设儿童天生脆弱,因为他们依赖他人,需要照顾。然而,贫困儿童在某些方面更容易受到伤害。按照卡特里奥娜·麦肯齐(Catriona MacKenzie)的说法,我们把这些脆弱性称为“致病性”;它们是由社会安排引起的,比如制度设置。我们认为,至少其中一些脆弱性可以而且应该通过提高儿童的适应力来减少。我们分三步进行。在本文的第一部分,我们发展了脆弱性的概念,并解释了儿童贫困如何使儿童容易受到特定伤害。在这里,我们还通过询问孩子需要哪些能力来应对这种情况来介绍能力方法。在第二部分中,我们认为弹性的概念有助于我们理解为什么能力(而不是资源或能力)与应对儿童贫困的不利影响有关。我们声称,促进儿童的能力是一个正义的问题,而实施弹性也是。同样非常重要的是要看到,促进复原力主要是一个社会问题,而不是儿童个人必须独自完成的任务。因此,我们认为,儿童有权获得这些能力,以提高他们抵御贫困不利影响的能力。在第三部分中,我们讨论了我们的叙述中的几个困难,例如儿童将承担应对贫困影响的危险,而不是社会与贫困作斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Genero & Direito
Revista Genero & Direito SOCIAL ISSUES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信