THE 'MATERIALIST' BENT IN CONTEMPORARY FEMINIST THEORY

IF 0.1
Brunella Casalini
{"title":"THE 'MATERIALIST' BENT IN CONTEMPORARY FEMINIST THEORY","authors":"Brunella Casalini","doi":"10.18351/2179-7137/ged.2015n2p134-147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the late eighties, feminist literature has produced a great number of contributions on the body. It has forgotten, however, its more properly biological dimension. Despite the desire to reconcile nature and nurture, this oversight has been encouraged by the fear of falling into some forms of essentialism and the difficult dialogue between social sciences and natural sciences. In recent years, however, some authors have tried to restore the body’s material dimension to center stage. This has happened because neuroscience and genomics have revived, in a more or less hidden way, a biological conception of race and sex. In this new context it has become more and more urgent to strive for an alliance between the natural sciences, the social sciences and feminism able to confront the challenges of the current phase of biocapitalism and biocolonialism. A new feminist materialism seems necessary to contrast the present form of reductionism, a molecular reductionism that decomposes the body into molecules, manipulable and exploitable bits of informational sequences that are transformable into “biovalue”. As Sarah Franklin maintains: “This instrumentalism has become inseparable from the capitalisation of life itself” (Franklin, 2000: 189).","PeriodicalId":42602,"journal":{"name":"Revista Genero & Direito","volume":"1 1","pages":"134-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Genero & Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18351/2179-7137/ged.2015n2p134-147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since the late eighties, feminist literature has produced a great number of contributions on the body. It has forgotten, however, its more properly biological dimension. Despite the desire to reconcile nature and nurture, this oversight has been encouraged by the fear of falling into some forms of essentialism and the difficult dialogue between social sciences and natural sciences. In recent years, however, some authors have tried to restore the body’s material dimension to center stage. This has happened because neuroscience and genomics have revived, in a more or less hidden way, a biological conception of race and sex. In this new context it has become more and more urgent to strive for an alliance between the natural sciences, the social sciences and feminism able to confront the challenges of the current phase of biocapitalism and biocolonialism. A new feminist materialism seems necessary to contrast the present form of reductionism, a molecular reductionism that decomposes the body into molecules, manipulable and exploitable bits of informational sequences that are transformable into “biovalue”. As Sarah Franklin maintains: “This instrumentalism has become inseparable from the capitalisation of life itself” (Franklin, 2000: 189).
当代女性主义理论中的“唯物主义”倾向
八十年代末以来,女性主义文学在人体方面产生了大量的贡献。然而,它已经忘记了它更恰当的生物层面。尽管人们渴望调和自然与后天的关系,但由于担心陷入某种形式的本质主义,以及社会科学与自然科学之间难以进行的对话,这种疏忽受到了鼓励。然而,近年来,一些作者试图将身体的物质维度恢复到人们关注的焦点。这是因为神经科学和基因组学以一种或多或少隐蔽的方式,复兴了种族和性别的生物学概念。在这种新的背景下,争取自然科学、社会科学和女权主义之间的联盟,以应对当前阶段生物资本主义和生物殖民主义的挑战,变得越来越紧迫。一种新的女权主义唯物主义似乎有必要与当前形式的还原论形成对比,这种还原论将身体分解为分子,这些分子是可操纵和可利用的信息序列片段,可转化为“生物价值”。正如莎拉·富兰克林所坚持的:“这种工具主义已经与生活本身的资本化密不可分”(富兰克林,2000:189)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Genero & Direito
Revista Genero & Direito SOCIAL ISSUES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信