Problems with the history of Southern Slavs in the Slavic studies of Ukrainian scientists of Eastern Galicia during the 19th century

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Iryna Fedoriv
{"title":"Problems with the history of Southern Slavs in the Slavic studies of Ukrainian scientists of Eastern Galicia during the 19th century","authors":"Iryna Fedoriv","doi":"10.18778/1644-857x.21.02.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the scientific heritage of Ukrainian scientists of Eastern Galicia in the 19th century on current issues with the history of South Slavic peoples. Its content, topics and methodology in the context of the development of national Slavonic studies are described. Special studies on the history of Bulgaria, Serbia, Croatia and Montenegro are analyzed. The most comprehensive of these studies are the scientific investigations of Denys Zubrytsky: Statement about Montenegro People; and Jakyw Holovatsky: Types of Slavic Peoples. Bulgarians, On the Transdanubian Slavs living on the Balkan Peninsula, Greater Croatia or Galician-Carpathian Rus. The content and problems of these studies give ground to claims that Galician scholars have a weak, sporadic knowledge of these peoples compared to the history of the Western Slavs. In spite of this, the questions raised by the scholars on: the peculiarities of the introduction of Christianity by Cyril and Methodius in Bulgaria; cultural, national, religious policy of the Ottoman Empire towards the Southern Slavs; the liberation movement of Bulgarians, Serbs, Montenegrins in the 19th century, etc.; testify to the scientific interest of scholars of Eastern Galicia in the Southern Slavs. At the same time, the interpretation of their history was of a civilizational nature and reflected the general trends in the development of Ukrainian historical Slavic studies in the 19th century.","PeriodicalId":36496,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Nauk Historycznych","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Nauk Historycznych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1644-857x.21.02.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the scientific heritage of Ukrainian scientists of Eastern Galicia in the 19th century on current issues with the history of South Slavic peoples. Its content, topics and methodology in the context of the development of national Slavonic studies are described. Special studies on the history of Bulgaria, Serbia, Croatia and Montenegro are analyzed. The most comprehensive of these studies are the scientific investigations of Denys Zubrytsky: Statement about Montenegro People; and Jakyw Holovatsky: Types of Slavic Peoples. Bulgarians, On the Transdanubian Slavs living on the Balkan Peninsula, Greater Croatia or Galician-Carpathian Rus. The content and problems of these studies give ground to claims that Galician scholars have a weak, sporadic knowledge of these peoples compared to the history of the Western Slavs. In spite of this, the questions raised by the scholars on: the peculiarities of the introduction of Christianity by Cyril and Methodius in Bulgaria; cultural, national, religious policy of the Ottoman Empire towards the Southern Slavs; the liberation movement of Bulgarians, Serbs, Montenegrins in the 19th century, etc.; testify to the scientific interest of scholars of Eastern Galicia in the Southern Slavs. At the same time, the interpretation of their history was of a civilizational nature and reflected the general trends in the development of Ukrainian historical Slavic studies in the 19th century.
19世纪东加利西亚乌克兰科学家斯拉夫研究中的南斯拉夫人历史问题
本文分析了19世纪东加利西亚乌克兰科学家的科学遗产与南斯拉夫民族历史的当前问题。它的内容,主题和方法在国家斯拉夫研究的发展背景下进行了描述。对保加利亚、塞尔维亚、克罗地亚和黑山的历史进行了特别研究。这些研究中最全面的是Denys Zubrytsky的科学调查:关于黑山人民的陈述;Jakyw Holovatsky:《斯拉夫民族的类型》。保加利亚人,居住在巴尔干半岛的外多瑙河斯拉夫人,大克罗地亚或加利西亚-喀尔巴阡罗斯人。这些研究的内容和问题让人有理由认为,与西斯拉夫人的历史相比,加利西亚学者对这些民族的了解薄弱且零星。尽管如此,学者们提出的问题是:西里尔和摩多迪乌斯在保加利亚引入基督教的特殊性;奥斯曼帝国对南方斯拉夫人的文化、民族和宗教政策;19世纪保加利亚人、塞尔维亚人、黑山人等的解放运动;证明了东加利西亚学者对南斯拉夫人的科学兴趣。同时,对其历史的解释具有文明性,反映了19世纪乌克兰历史斯拉夫研究发展的总体趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Przeglad Nauk Historycznych
Przeglad Nauk Historycznych Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信