Philanthropy and "Muslim Citizenship" in Post-Suharto Indonesia

IF 0.9 Q3 AREA STUDIES
H. Latief
{"title":"Philanthropy and \"Muslim Citizenship\" in Post-Suharto Indonesia","authors":"H. Latief","doi":"10.20495/SEAS.5.2_269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionWelfare provision in a nation-state era has become an interesting issue to investigate. In many developing countries, economic growth is often hindered by an inadequacy of a reliable welfare system to benefit society at large. Indonesia, the largest country in Southeast Asia, which is inhabited by more than 250 million people, seems to have suffered from such an inadequacy. After the fall of Suharto in the late 1990s, Indonesia recovered from the financial and political crises and then started experiencing considerable economic growth and democratization. Nevertheless, an adequate welfare system that can reach all parts of society remains hard to find, despite the increased economic growth in the past 10 years. The public does not easily accept Indonesian government statistics showing a decrease in the number of people living below the poverty line. As such, statistical reports do not stop civic organizations from acting as non-state welfare providers by trying to provide aid for particular segments of society unreachable by state welfare agencies.In this increasingly democratic country, civic organizations with different social, religious, and political orientations have flourished. In post-New Order Indonesia, civil society organizations have appeared publicly in different ways: as NGOs focusing on community development projects (Sinaga 1995; Hadiwinata 2003), as ethnic-based mass organizations supporting political institutions (Aspinall 2011), and as religion-based paramilitary groups focusing on the imposition of religiously inspired public norms (Hasan 2002; Jahroni 2004). Others have appeared as voluntary welfare associations attempting to offer an alternative to the state's role in fulfilling social needs. These types of groups have had a massive presence in the public sphere. One may argue that such a lively civic engagement in the public sphere can lead society to the achievement of democratic values, in a way comparable to what happened in the New Order era. While this assumption may be true in a certain context, the increasing participation of society in Indonesia's political sphere may also lead to other consequences that are not necessarily suitable for democratic values. Corruption, collusion, clientelism, new authoritarian culture, predatory political groupings, social disparity, and economic inequality are examples of how civil society in a democratic era is still \"burdened\" by undemocratic behavior (Aspinall and Van Klinken 2011).This paper examines the roles of Muslim volunteer organizations-which are referred to as Islamic philanthropic associations-in shaping the nature of democratic culture in Indonesia and analyzes their contribution to the creation of a just society. Studies suggest that in the past three decades Islamic philanthropic associations in Indonesia have had a vibrant public presence, more than ever before. They have actively engaged in various types of social projects to cater for the poor, as well as had a profound impact on Muslim discourse on welfare issues (Fauzia 2013; Latief 2014; Retsikas 2014). The objectives of Islamic philanthropic organizations, as reflected in their organizational mission, include fostering social justice and bettering the welfare of society. In practice, Islamic philanthropic organizations provide aid for those in need, including low-income families, orphans, disaster victims, and refugees in city slums and disaster-affected areas. Given the wide range of Islamic philanthropic activism in Indonesia, this paper examines Muslims' understanding of citizenship and how they interpret people's rights and the state's responsibility by analyzing two cases. The first case concerns the role of Islamic philanthropic organizations in validating the rights of the poor. The second is about how Islamic philanthropic organizations define the rights of underprivileged minority groups, including Shi'a and Ahmadiyya communities, and whether or not these groups deserve assistance from their fellow Muslims. …","PeriodicalId":42525,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"269-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20495/SEAS.5.2_269","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20495/SEAS.5.2_269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

IntroductionWelfare provision in a nation-state era has become an interesting issue to investigate. In many developing countries, economic growth is often hindered by an inadequacy of a reliable welfare system to benefit society at large. Indonesia, the largest country in Southeast Asia, which is inhabited by more than 250 million people, seems to have suffered from such an inadequacy. After the fall of Suharto in the late 1990s, Indonesia recovered from the financial and political crises and then started experiencing considerable economic growth and democratization. Nevertheless, an adequate welfare system that can reach all parts of society remains hard to find, despite the increased economic growth in the past 10 years. The public does not easily accept Indonesian government statistics showing a decrease in the number of people living below the poverty line. As such, statistical reports do not stop civic organizations from acting as non-state welfare providers by trying to provide aid for particular segments of society unreachable by state welfare agencies.In this increasingly democratic country, civic organizations with different social, religious, and political orientations have flourished. In post-New Order Indonesia, civil society organizations have appeared publicly in different ways: as NGOs focusing on community development projects (Sinaga 1995; Hadiwinata 2003), as ethnic-based mass organizations supporting political institutions (Aspinall 2011), and as religion-based paramilitary groups focusing on the imposition of religiously inspired public norms (Hasan 2002; Jahroni 2004). Others have appeared as voluntary welfare associations attempting to offer an alternative to the state's role in fulfilling social needs. These types of groups have had a massive presence in the public sphere. One may argue that such a lively civic engagement in the public sphere can lead society to the achievement of democratic values, in a way comparable to what happened in the New Order era. While this assumption may be true in a certain context, the increasing participation of society in Indonesia's political sphere may also lead to other consequences that are not necessarily suitable for democratic values. Corruption, collusion, clientelism, new authoritarian culture, predatory political groupings, social disparity, and economic inequality are examples of how civil society in a democratic era is still "burdened" by undemocratic behavior (Aspinall and Van Klinken 2011).This paper examines the roles of Muslim volunteer organizations-which are referred to as Islamic philanthropic associations-in shaping the nature of democratic culture in Indonesia and analyzes their contribution to the creation of a just society. Studies suggest that in the past three decades Islamic philanthropic associations in Indonesia have had a vibrant public presence, more than ever before. They have actively engaged in various types of social projects to cater for the poor, as well as had a profound impact on Muslim discourse on welfare issues (Fauzia 2013; Latief 2014; Retsikas 2014). The objectives of Islamic philanthropic organizations, as reflected in their organizational mission, include fostering social justice and bettering the welfare of society. In practice, Islamic philanthropic organizations provide aid for those in need, including low-income families, orphans, disaster victims, and refugees in city slums and disaster-affected areas. Given the wide range of Islamic philanthropic activism in Indonesia, this paper examines Muslims' understanding of citizenship and how they interpret people's rights and the state's responsibility by analyzing two cases. The first case concerns the role of Islamic philanthropic organizations in validating the rights of the poor. The second is about how Islamic philanthropic organizations define the rights of underprivileged minority groups, including Shi'a and Ahmadiyya communities, and whether or not these groups deserve assistance from their fellow Muslims. …
后苏哈托印尼的慈善与“穆斯林公民”
民族国家时代的福利供给已经成为一个值得研究的有趣问题。在许多发展中国家,经济增长往往因缺乏使整个社会受益的可靠福利制度而受到阻碍。印度尼西亚是东南亚最大的国家,人口超过2.5亿,似乎也受到了这种不足的影响。上世纪90年代末苏哈托倒台后,印尼从金融和政治危机中恢复过来,然后开始经历可观的经济增长和民主化。然而,尽管过去10年经济增长加快,但仍然很难找到一个能够覆盖社会各阶层的充分的福利制度。印尼政府统计数据显示,生活在贫困线以下的人口数量有所减少,公众很难接受这一数据。因此,统计报告并不能阻止民间组织充当非国家福利提供者的角色,试图为国家福利机构无法触及的特定社会阶层提供援助。在这个日益民主的国家,不同社会、宗教和政治取向的公民组织蓬勃发展。在后新秩序的印尼,民间社会组织以不同的方式公开出现:作为关注社区发展项目的非政府组织(Sinaga, 1995;Hadiwinata 2003),作为支持政治机构的以民族为基础的群众组织(Aspinall 2011),以及作为以宗教为基础的准军事组织,专注于强加宗教启发的公共规范(Hasan 2002;Jahroni 2004)。另一些则以志愿福利协会的形式出现,试图为国家在满足社会需求方面的角色提供另一种选择。这些类型的团体在公共领域有大量的存在。有人可能会说,在公共领域如此活跃的公民参与,可以以一种与新秩序时代所发生的情况相当的方式,引导社会实现民主价值观。虽然这一假设在某种情况下可能是正确的,但社会越来越多地参与印度尼西亚的政治领域也可能导致不一定适合民主价值观的其他后果。腐败、勾结、裙带关系、新威权主义文化、掠夺性政治集团、社会差距和经济不平等都是民主时代公民社会仍然被不民主行为“负担”的例子(Aspinall和Van Klinken 2011)。本文考察了穆斯林志愿者组织(被称为伊斯兰慈善协会)在塑造印度尼西亚民主文化本质中的作用,并分析了他们对建立公正社会的贡献。研究表明,在过去的三十年里,印度尼西亚的伊斯兰慈善协会比以往任何时候都更加活跃。他们积极参与各种类型的社会项目,以满足穷人的需求,并对穆斯林关于福利问题的话语产生了深远的影响(Fauzia 2013;Latief 2014;Retsikas 2014)。伊斯兰慈善组织的目标反映在其组织使命中,包括促进社会正义和改善社会福利。在实践中,伊斯兰慈善组织为低收入家庭、孤儿、灾难受害者、城市贫民窟和受灾地区的难民等有需要的人提供援助。鉴于印度尼西亚的伊斯兰慈善活动范围广泛,本文通过分析两个案例来考察穆斯林对公民身份的理解,以及他们如何解释人民的权利和国家的责任。第一个案例涉及伊斯兰慈善组织在确认穷人权利方面的作用。第二个问题是关于伊斯兰慈善组织如何界定弱势少数群体的权利,包括什叶派和艾哈迈迪亚社区,以及这些群体是否应该得到穆斯林同胞的帮助。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southeast Asian Studies
Southeast Asian Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The new journal aims to promote excellent, agenda-setting scholarship and provide a forum for dialogue and collaboration both within and beyond the region. Southeast Asian Studies engages in wide-ranging and in-depth discussions that are attuned to the issues, debates, and imperatives within the region, while affirming the importance of learning and sharing ideas on a cross-country, global, and historical scale. An integral part of the journal’s mandate is to foster scholarship that is capable of bridging the continuing divide in area studies between the social sciences and humanities, on the one hand, and the natural sciences, on the other hand. To this end, the journal welcomes accessibly written articles that build on insights and cutting-edge research from the natural sciences. The journal also publishes research reports, which are shorter but fully peer-reviewed articles that present original findings or new concepts that result from specific research projects or outcomes of research collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书