Computed Tomography Perfusion Deficit as an Indicator for Reperfusion in Large-vessel Occlusions with Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Scores in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Retrospective Review

S. Kothari, Uttam Verma, Michael I Nahhas, J. Waller, S. Rahimi, J. Switzer, D. Giurgiutiu
{"title":"Computed Tomography Perfusion Deficit as an Indicator for Reperfusion in Large-vessel Occlusions with Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Scores in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Retrospective Review","authors":"S. Kothari, Uttam Verma, Michael I Nahhas, J. Waller, S. Rahimi, J. Switzer, D. Giurgiutiu","doi":"10.17925/usn.2022.18.2.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has proven to be successful in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of >8, but remains controversial in AIS with an NIHSS score of <8. This study evaluated computed tomography (CT) perfusion indicators for EVT in large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischaemic strokes with low NIHSS scores. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 49 patients with AIS, LVO and an NIHSS score of <8 who received medical therapy (n=27), or rescue (n=10) or urgent (n=12) thrombectomy. Therapy decision was made from clinical course and perfusion imaging. The urgent group underwent EVT in <6 hours. The rescue group underwent EVT in >6 hours due to increasing NIHSS scores; this included patients who presented after 6 hours and underwent urgent EVT. Modified Rankin scores were obtained at 3 months to assess outcomes. Results: More patients in the urgent group (91.7%) had a discharge NIHSS improvement (>1) compared with the rescue (50.0%) and medical (51.9%) groups (p=0.02). The urgent group displayed thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores of 2b/3 in 100% of patients, whereas the rescue group displayed TICI scores of 2b/3 in 80% and 1/2a in 20% (p=0.076). The perfusion core (cerebral blood flow [CBF] <30%) was not different between the groups (2.1 cm3, 1.0 cm3 and 9.2 cm3, for urgent, rescue and medical groups, respectively). The perfusion penumbra (time to max [Tmax] >6 s) and mismatch (Tmax minus CBF) were significantly larger for the urgent and rescue groups. Penumbra volume was 80.1 cm3, 107.5 cm3 versus 50.6 cm3 (p=0.011), and mismatch was 78.0 cm3, 106.5 cm3 versus 41.5 cm3 (p=0.002) for urgent and rescue thrombectomy versus medical therapy, respectively. Conclusion: The biggest driver of urgent reperfusion was a larger penumbra seen on CT perfusion, which appeared to show better outcomes in NIHSS scores at discharge without any difference in 3-month outcomes graded by modified Rankin scores. Our data suggest that larger perfusion deficits on CT imaging may serve as a tool for patient selection for EVT in LVO with an NIHSS score of <8 and should be investigated further.","PeriodicalId":90076,"journal":{"name":"US neurology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/usn.2022.18.2.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has proven to be successful in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of >8, but remains controversial in AIS with an NIHSS score of <8. This study evaluated computed tomography (CT) perfusion indicators for EVT in large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischaemic strokes with low NIHSS scores. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 49 patients with AIS, LVO and an NIHSS score of <8 who received medical therapy (n=27), or rescue (n=10) or urgent (n=12) thrombectomy. Therapy decision was made from clinical course and perfusion imaging. The urgent group underwent EVT in <6 hours. The rescue group underwent EVT in >6 hours due to increasing NIHSS scores; this included patients who presented after 6 hours and underwent urgent EVT. Modified Rankin scores were obtained at 3 months to assess outcomes. Results: More patients in the urgent group (91.7%) had a discharge NIHSS improvement (>1) compared with the rescue (50.0%) and medical (51.9%) groups (p=0.02). The urgent group displayed thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores of 2b/3 in 100% of patients, whereas the rescue group displayed TICI scores of 2b/3 in 80% and 1/2a in 20% (p=0.076). The perfusion core (cerebral blood flow [CBF] <30%) was not different between the groups (2.1 cm3, 1.0 cm3 and 9.2 cm3, for urgent, rescue and medical groups, respectively). The perfusion penumbra (time to max [Tmax] >6 s) and mismatch (Tmax minus CBF) were significantly larger for the urgent and rescue groups. Penumbra volume was 80.1 cm3, 107.5 cm3 versus 50.6 cm3 (p=0.011), and mismatch was 78.0 cm3, 106.5 cm3 versus 41.5 cm3 (p=0.002) for urgent and rescue thrombectomy versus medical therapy, respectively. Conclusion: The biggest driver of urgent reperfusion was a larger penumbra seen on CT perfusion, which appeared to show better outcomes in NIHSS scores at discharge without any difference in 3-month outcomes graded by modified Rankin scores. Our data suggest that larger perfusion deficits on CT imaging may serve as a tool for patient selection for EVT in LVO with an NIHSS score of <8 and should be investigated further.
计算机断层扫描灌注不足作为急性缺血性脑卒中中美国国立卫生研究院卒中评分低的大血管闭塞再灌注的指标:回顾性回顾
背景:血管内取栓术(EVT)在美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分为bb0.8的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)中已被证明是成功的,但在NIHSS评分为6小时的AIS中仍存在争议,因为NIHSS评分增加;这包括6小时后就诊并接受紧急EVT的患者。3个月时获得修正Rankin评分以评估预后。结果:急诊组患者出院时NIHSS改善(bbb1)(91.7%)高于抢救组(50.0%)和内科组(51.9%)(p=0.02)。急诊组100%患者的TICI评分为2b/3分,抢救组80%患者的TICI评分为2b/3分,20%患者的TICI评分为1/2a分(p=0.076)。急救组和抢救组的灌注核心(脑血流量[CBF] 6 s)和失配(Tmax - CBF)均显著增大。半暗区体积分别为80.1 cm3、107.5 cm3和50.6 cm3 (p=0.011),紧急和抢救取栓与药物治疗的不匹配分别为78.0 cm3、106.5 cm3和41.5 cm3 (p=0.002)。结论:紧急再灌注的最大驱动因素是CT灌注时看到的更大的半暗带,出院时NIHSS评分较好,3个月的修正Rankin评分评分无差异。我们的数据表明,CT成像上较大的灌注缺陷可能作为NIHSS评分<8的LVO患者选择EVT的工具,应该进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信