Differences in the Force-Velocity profile between Judoist and freestyle wrestlers

IF 1.1 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
J. P. Párraga Montilla, P. L. Latorre Román, Victor Serrano Huete, J. C. Cabrera Linares, Emilio D. Lozano Aguilera, Pedro Jiménez Reyes
{"title":"Differences in the Force-Velocity profile between Judoist and freestyle wrestlers","authors":"J. P. Párraga Montilla, P. L. Latorre Román, Victor Serrano Huete, J. C. Cabrera Linares, Emilio D. Lozano Aguilera, Pedro Jiménez Reyes","doi":"10.16926/par.2022.10.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to gain new knowledge about the force-velocity (F-V) profile in Judoist and freestyle wrestlers, investigating if there were any differences between sports and which physical demands have which fighting modalities. Participants: 24 athletes (male) took part in this study. Twelve Judoist (age: 20.3 ± 3.9 years, weight: 76.4 ± 10.4 kg; height: 179.4 ± 5.3 cm; BMI: 32.2 ±1.9 kg/m2) and twelve freestyle wrestlers (age: 19.6 ± 4.5 years, weight: 65.3 ± 13.6 kg; height: 177.5 ±5.7 cm; BMI: 23.8 ± 1.8 kg/m2) participated. Methods: To evaluate the F-V profile, the participants performed a squat jump (SJ) without load, as well as with different load conditions (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of athlete’s body mass). To assess the height of the jump, the OptoGait system was used. Consequently, the theoretical maximal force (F 0); the theoretical maximal velocity (V 0); maximal mechanical power output (Pmax); slope of the linear F-V relationship (Sfv); optimal F-V profile (Sfvopt ); and the differences between Sfv and Sfvopt (FV imb% ) were obtained. Results: A higher F 0 and lower V 0 were found in Judo athletes compared to wrestlers. Significant differences were found in Sfv and FV imb (p<0.001). Conclusion: The F-V profile is an accurate, reliable, and economical method that facilitates the evaluation of the current state of the athlete individually. Practical applications: The F-V profile method allows coaches and athletes to adjust their training objectives to achieve a higher level in their sport.","PeriodicalId":43466,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2022.10.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to gain new knowledge about the force-velocity (F-V) profile in Judoist and freestyle wrestlers, investigating if there were any differences between sports and which physical demands have which fighting modalities. Participants: 24 athletes (male) took part in this study. Twelve Judoist (age: 20.3 ± 3.9 years, weight: 76.4 ± 10.4 kg; height: 179.4 ± 5.3 cm; BMI: 32.2 ±1.9 kg/m2) and twelve freestyle wrestlers (age: 19.6 ± 4.5 years, weight: 65.3 ± 13.6 kg; height: 177.5 ±5.7 cm; BMI: 23.8 ± 1.8 kg/m2) participated. Methods: To evaluate the F-V profile, the participants performed a squat jump (SJ) without load, as well as with different load conditions (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of athlete’s body mass). To assess the height of the jump, the OptoGait system was used. Consequently, the theoretical maximal force (F 0); the theoretical maximal velocity (V 0); maximal mechanical power output (Pmax); slope of the linear F-V relationship (Sfv); optimal F-V profile (Sfvopt ); and the differences between Sfv and Sfvopt (FV imb% ) were obtained. Results: A higher F 0 and lower V 0 were found in Judo athletes compared to wrestlers. Significant differences were found in Sfv and FV imb (p<0.001). Conclusion: The F-V profile is an accurate, reliable, and economical method that facilitates the evaluation of the current state of the athlete individually. Practical applications: The F-V profile method allows coaches and athletes to adjust their training objectives to achieve a higher level in their sport.
柔道选手和自由式摔跤选手力量-速度剖面的差异
背景:本研究的目的是获得关于柔道和自由式摔跤运动员的力-速度(F-V)特征的新知识,调查运动之间是否有任何差异,以及不同的身体需求有不同的战斗方式。参与者:24名运动员(男性)参加本研究。十二名柔道选手(年龄:20.3±3.9岁,体重:76.4±10.4公斤;高度:179.4±5.3 cm;BMI: 32.2±1.9 kg/m2),自由式摔跤选手12名(年龄:19.6±4.5岁,体重:65.3±13.6 kg;高度:177.5±5.7 cm;BMI: 23.8±1.8 kg/m2)。方法:为了评估F-V特征,参与者在没有负荷的情况下进行深蹲跳(SJ),以及不同的负荷条件(0、25、50、75和100%的运动员体重)。为了评估跳跃的高度,使用了opto步态系统。因此,理论最大力(f0);理论最大速度(v0);最大机械输出功率;线性F-V关系的斜率(Sfv);最优F-V剖面(Sfvopt);Sfv与Sfvopt的差异(fvimb %)。结果:柔道运动员的f0比摔跤运动员高,v0比摔跤运动员低。Sfv和FV imb有显著性差异(p<0.001)。结论:F-V曲线是一种准确、可靠、经济的评价运动员个人状态的方法。实际应用:F-V剖面方法允许教练和运动员调整他们的训练目标,以达到更高的运动水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Activity Review
Physical Activity Review SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Activity Review aims to facilitate and enhance communication across all sub-disciplines of the sport sciences. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, applied to sport and exercise. Subject areas suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields: Sport Science Sport Pedagogy Physiology Biomechanics Sports theory and history Different aspects of martial arts Recreation and tourism Physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信