Classification and Mechanical Behaviors of Inner Concave Cable-Arch Structure with V-Shape Web Struts

IF 1.1 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Dabin Yang, Yi Sun, Renjie Liu, Leilei Guo
{"title":"Classification and Mechanical Behaviors of Inner Concave Cable-Arch Structure with V-Shape Web Struts","authors":"Dabin Yang, Yi Sun, Renjie Liu, Leilei Guo","doi":"10.20898/j.iass.2023.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inner concave cable-arch structures with V-shape web struts were classified, and single-tensioning construction method and multiple-tensioning construction method for continuous cable-arch structures were described. The optimization of pretension for multiple-tensioning construction method was carried out. FE models of cable-arch structures including the single-tensioning models and the multiple-tensioning models were created. The mechanical behaviors including stress ratios, stiffness, horizontal bearing reaction force and structural stability of the two kinds of models were compared. The results show that the pretension does not significantly influence the maximum resultant displacement, horizontal bearing reaction force, and stability of the single-tensioning cable-arch structures. With pretension increasing the stress ratios can be reduced. The stress ratios and stiffness decrease with the increasing of the rise-to-span ratio, and horizontal bearing reaction force slightly decreases, but structural stability has no obvious changing rules. There is no difference in mechanical behaviors between two types of cable-arch structures with the rise-to-span ratio of 0.2, it is recommended to use the single-tensioning construction method. However, the mechanical behaviors of multiple-tensioning type are generally better than that of single-tensioning type with the rise-to-span ratio of 0.3 and 0.4. It is necessary to consider the cost of construction and mechanical behaviors to determine its tensioning construction method.","PeriodicalId":42855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2023.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inner concave cable-arch structures with V-shape web struts were classified, and single-tensioning construction method and multiple-tensioning construction method for continuous cable-arch structures were described. The optimization of pretension for multiple-tensioning construction method was carried out. FE models of cable-arch structures including the single-tensioning models and the multiple-tensioning models were created. The mechanical behaviors including stress ratios, stiffness, horizontal bearing reaction force and structural stability of the two kinds of models were compared. The results show that the pretension does not significantly influence the maximum resultant displacement, horizontal bearing reaction force, and stability of the single-tensioning cable-arch structures. With pretension increasing the stress ratios can be reduced. The stress ratios and stiffness decrease with the increasing of the rise-to-span ratio, and horizontal bearing reaction force slightly decreases, but structural stability has no obvious changing rules. There is no difference in mechanical behaviors between two types of cable-arch structures with the rise-to-span ratio of 0.2, it is recommended to use the single-tensioning construction method. However, the mechanical behaviors of multiple-tensioning type are generally better than that of single-tensioning type with the rise-to-span ratio of 0.3 and 0.4. It is necessary to consider the cost of construction and mechanical behaviors to determine its tensioning construction method.
v形腹板内凹索拱结构的分类及受力性能
对带有v形腹板支撑的内凹索拱结构进行了分类,介绍了连续索拱结构的单张拉施工方法和多次张拉施工方法。对多重张拉施工方法的预紧力进行了优化。建立了索拱结构的单张拉模型和多张拉模型。比较了两种模型的受力性能,包括应力比、刚度、水平支承反力和结构稳定性。结果表明:预应力对单张拉索拱结构的最大合位移、水平支座反力和稳定性影响不显著;随着预紧力的增加,应力比可以减小。应力比和刚度随升跨比的增大而减小,水平支座反力略有减小,但结构稳定性无明显变化规律。当升跨比为0.2时,两类索拱结构受力性能无差异,建议采用单张拉施工方法。而多张拉型的受力性能普遍优于单张拉型,其升跨比分别为0.3和0.4。在确定其张拉施工方法时,需要考虑施工成本和力学性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Association publishes an international journal, the Journal of the IASS, four times yearly, in print (ISSN 1028-365X) and on-line (ISSN 1996-9015). The months of publication are March, June, September and December. Occasional extra electronic-only issues are included in the on-line version. From this page you can access one or more issues -- a sample issue if you are not logged into the members-only portion of the site, or the current issue and several back issues if you are logged in as a member. For any issue that you can view, you can download articles as .pdf files.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信