From feedback to follow-up in the third turn of IRF sequences: A challenge to promote genuine interaction in EFL classes

Laura Margarita Pinzón-Jácome, Carlos Augusto Lozano-Jaimes, Laura Cristina Dueñas-Angulo
{"title":"From feedback to follow-up in the third turn of IRF sequences: A challenge to promote genuine interaction in EFL classes","authors":"Laura Margarita Pinzón-Jácome, Carlos Augusto Lozano-Jaimes, Laura Cristina Dueñas-Angulo","doi":"10.16925/ra.v18i33.1846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In this paper, we present an analysis of the teacher-student interaction patterns in efl classes found at a Colombian private university. Methodology: This analysis was made during a qualitative case study in which 36 class observations were conducted. Data were coded and further categorized with the help of Nvivo10 software. Findings: Teacher-student interaction was the most common type of classroom exchange. A three-turn sequence, commonly referred to as irf, was chief among those interactions. In an irf exchange the teacher (I)nitiates the interaction, the student (R)esponds and the teacher provides (F)eedback . The third turn in irf exchanges was scarcely used to follow-up on students’ responses. Furthermore, we present the implications of using the third turn for both feedback and follow-up. Conclusions: Given the analysis made, the authors conclude that teachers should use the third turn for follow-up if the goal is to promote genuine linguistic interaction and engage students in meaningful communication.","PeriodicalId":30972,"journal":{"name":"Rastros Rostros","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rastros Rostros","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16925/ra.v18i33.1846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: In this paper, we present an analysis of the teacher-student interaction patterns in efl classes found at a Colombian private university. Methodology: This analysis was made during a qualitative case study in which 36 class observations were conducted. Data were coded and further categorized with the help of Nvivo10 software. Findings: Teacher-student interaction was the most common type of classroom exchange. A three-turn sequence, commonly referred to as irf, was chief among those interactions. In an irf exchange the teacher (I)nitiates the interaction, the student (R)esponds and the teacher provides (F)eedback . The third turn in irf exchanges was scarcely used to follow-up on students’ responses. Furthermore, we present the implications of using the third turn for both feedback and follow-up. Conclusions: Given the analysis made, the authors conclude that teachers should use the third turn for follow-up if the goal is to promote genuine linguistic interaction and engage students in meaningful communication.
从第三轮IRF序列的反馈到后续:促进英语课堂真实互动的挑战
前言:本文对哥伦比亚一所私立大学英语课堂的师生互动模式进行了分析。方法:本分析是在定性案例研究中进行的,其中进行了36个班级观察。数据在Nvivo10软件的帮助下进行编码和进一步分类。发现:师生互动是最常见的课堂交流形式。一个三回合的序列,通常被称为irf,是这些相互作用中的主要部分。在irf交换中,教师(I)发起互动,学生(R)回应,教师(F)提供反馈。irf交流的第三轮几乎没有用于跟进学生的反应。此外,我们提出了使用第三轮反馈和后续的含义。结论:基于分析,作者得出结论,如果教师的目标是促进真正的语言互动,并使学生参与有意义的交流,则应使用第三轮进行跟进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信