Meta-analysis of Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials of Safinamide and Entacapone as Add-on Therapy to Levodopa in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

Q4 Medicine
J. Schnitker, T. Müller
{"title":"Meta-analysis of Placebo-controlled Clinical Trials of Safinamide and Entacapone as Add-on Therapy to Levodopa in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease","authors":"J. Schnitker, T. Müller","doi":"10.17925/ENR.2015.10.01.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic levodopa (L-dopa) treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients is sooner or later associated with the onset of motor complications, for example wearing off and dyskinesia. PD patients with motor complications usually require the addition of further PD drugs to reduce these L-dopa side effects and enhance its efficacy. Entacapone is an available catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, which was extensively investigated as add-on to L-dopa/dopadecarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) application in PD patients. Safinamide, a watersoluble, orally active a-aminoamide derivative, which modulates dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission with a unique dual mechanism of action, has been studied in two placebo-controlled clinical trials as add-on therapy to L-dopa in fluctuating PD patients. To date, there are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing the efficacy of safinamide and entacapone in the clinic. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine effect sizes of safinamide and entacapone as add-on treatment to L-dopa in fluctuating PD patients. A systematic search of the literature on entacapone trials up to the end of September 2014 was first conducted on the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases in order to identify appropriate studies. Definition criteria for inclusion were prospective, randomised, placebocontrolled and double-blinded trials on the efficacy and safety of entacapone or safinamide in fluctuating L-dopa-treated PD patients. Four studies for entacapone and two trials on safinamide were considered. Data from the safinamide trials were provided by Zambon and therefore ‘safinamide’ was not used as a search term. Safinamide and entacapone treatment was comparable in terms of the main efficacy variables ( off time, percentage on time, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale). Significant advantages in favour of safinamide were shown in terms of the total incidence of adverse events (AEs) in comparison to placebo, the study discontinuation due to AEs and deaths and in the risk differences of the AEs versus placebo, particularly for nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, dizziness, urine abnormality and shortness of breath. The odds ratio (OR) of 0.907 for any AE corresponds to an overall AE rate of 68.7 % for safinamide whereas the OR of 2.089 to an overall AE rate of 84.4 % for entacapone.","PeriodicalId":12047,"journal":{"name":"European neurological review","volume":"10 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European neurological review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/ENR.2015.10.01.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Chronic levodopa (L-dopa) treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients is sooner or later associated with the onset of motor complications, for example wearing off and dyskinesia. PD patients with motor complications usually require the addition of further PD drugs to reduce these L-dopa side effects and enhance its efficacy. Entacapone is an available catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, which was extensively investigated as add-on to L-dopa/dopadecarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) application in PD patients. Safinamide, a watersoluble, orally active a-aminoamide derivative, which modulates dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission with a unique dual mechanism of action, has been studied in two placebo-controlled clinical trials as add-on therapy to L-dopa in fluctuating PD patients. To date, there are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing the efficacy of safinamide and entacapone in the clinic. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine effect sizes of safinamide and entacapone as add-on treatment to L-dopa in fluctuating PD patients. A systematic search of the literature on entacapone trials up to the end of September 2014 was first conducted on the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases in order to identify appropriate studies. Definition criteria for inclusion were prospective, randomised, placebocontrolled and double-blinded trials on the efficacy and safety of entacapone or safinamide in fluctuating L-dopa-treated PD patients. Four studies for entacapone and two trials on safinamide were considered. Data from the safinamide trials were provided by Zambon and therefore ‘safinamide’ was not used as a search term. Safinamide and entacapone treatment was comparable in terms of the main efficacy variables ( off time, percentage on time, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale). Significant advantages in favour of safinamide were shown in terms of the total incidence of adverse events (AEs) in comparison to placebo, the study discontinuation due to AEs and deaths and in the risk differences of the AEs versus placebo, particularly for nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, dizziness, urine abnormality and shortness of breath. The odds ratio (OR) of 0.907 for any AE corresponds to an overall AE rate of 68.7 % for safinamide whereas the OR of 2.089 to an overall AE rate of 84.4 % for entacapone.
沙非胺和恩他卡朋作为左旋多巴辅助治疗帕金森病的安慰剂对照临床试验的meta分析
慢性左旋多巴(L-dopa)治疗帕金森病(PD)患者或早或晚与运动并发症的发作相关,例如疲劳和运动障碍。伴有运动并发症的PD患者通常需要进一步添加PD药物以减少这些左旋多巴副作用并增强其疗效。恩他卡酮是一种有效的儿茶酚-o -甲基转移酶(COMT)抑制剂,被广泛研究作为左旋多巴/多巴羧化酶抑制剂(DDCI)的附加应用于PD患者。沙非胺是一种水溶性、口服活性的a-氨基酰胺衍生物,具有独特的双重作用机制,可调节多巴胺能和谷氨酸能神经传递。在两项安慰剂对照临床试验中,沙非胺作为波动型PD患者左旋多巴的补充疗法进行了研究。到目前为止,还没有在临床中比较沙非胺和恩他卡朋疗效的正面临床试验。本荟萃分析的目的是确定沙非胺和恩他卡彭作为波动型PD患者左旋多巴的附加治疗的效应大小。系统检索截至2014年9月底的恩他卡彭试验文献,首先在MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中进行,以确定合适的研究。纳入的定义标准是前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照和双盲试验,研究恩他卡朋或沙非胺对波动左旋多巴治疗的PD患者的疗效和安全性。四项关于恩他卡朋的研究和两项关于沙非胺的研究被纳入考虑。沙芬酰胺试验的数据由Zambon提供,因此“沙芬酰胺”没有被用作搜索词。沙非胺和恩他卡彭治疗在主要疗效变量(停药时间、按时百分比、统一帕金森病评定量表)方面具有可比性。与安慰剂相比,沙芬胺在不良事件(ae)的总发生率、因ae和死亡导致的研究中止以及ae与安慰剂的风险差异方面显示出显著优势,特别是在恶心、呕吐、腹泻、头晕、尿液异常和呼吸短促方面。沙非胺的AE比值比(OR)为0.907,对应的AE总发生率为68.7%;恩他卡酮的OR为2.089,对应的AE总发生率为84.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European neurological review
European neurological review Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信