Monitoring performance indicators of mechanized agricultural operations through a systemic method

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
P. Peloia, M. Milan, T. L. Romanelli, L. M. Gimenez
{"title":"Monitoring performance indicators of mechanized agricultural operations through a systemic method","authors":"P. Peloia, M. Milan, T. L. Romanelli, L. M. Gimenez","doi":"10.1590/1678-992x-2021-0143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Key performance indicators (KPI) are essential to decision-making in an organization, but the approach to analysis and composition used in the formulation of the KPIs can lead to errors. Analysis based only on averages does not allow for discriminating between variations that are natural to the process or special cases which require investigation. The use of control charts can identify this differentiation. However, when several charts are presented encompassing different measurement units and scales, systemic interpretation can be impaired. To assist in this interpretation, this research study aimed at proposing a method to facilitate the analysis of control charts when multiple indicators are employed in the monitoring of agricultural operations. Based on the data obtained over 26 weeks from a mechanized sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) harvesting front, six indicators were defined and analyzed through individual control charts and, systemically, through a standardized group control chart. Results show that the points identified as being outside the control zone (special causes of variation) according to the standardized group control chart were the same as those identified by the six individual charts, which demonstrates the potential of this method to summarize the information with no loss of quality of analysis.","PeriodicalId":49559,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Agricola","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Agricola","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2021-0143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Key performance indicators (KPI) are essential to decision-making in an organization, but the approach to analysis and composition used in the formulation of the KPIs can lead to errors. Analysis based only on averages does not allow for discriminating between variations that are natural to the process or special cases which require investigation. The use of control charts can identify this differentiation. However, when several charts are presented encompassing different measurement units and scales, systemic interpretation can be impaired. To assist in this interpretation, this research study aimed at proposing a method to facilitate the analysis of control charts when multiple indicators are employed in the monitoring of agricultural operations. Based on the data obtained over 26 weeks from a mechanized sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) harvesting front, six indicators were defined and analyzed through individual control charts and, systemically, through a standardized group control chart. Results show that the points identified as being outside the control zone (special causes of variation) according to the standardized group control chart were the same as those identified by the six individual charts, which demonstrates the potential of this method to summarize the information with no loss of quality of analysis.
通过系统的方法监测农业机械化经营绩效指标
关键绩效指标(KPI)对组织中的决策至关重要,但是在KPI的制定中使用的分析和组合方法可能导致错误。仅以平均值为基础的分析不能区分过程的自然变化或需要调查的特殊情况。使用控制图可以识别这种差异。然而,当几个图表包含不同的测量单位和尺度时,系统解释可能会受损。为了协助这一解释,本研究旨在提出一种在农业经营监测中采用多指标时便于控制图分析的方法。根据机械化甘蔗收获前沿26周的数据,通过个体控制图和标准化群体控制图对6个指标进行了定义和分析。结果表明,根据标准化群体控制图识别出的控制区外点(特殊变异原因)与六个单独图识别出的点相同,这表明该方法在不损失分析质量的情况下总结信息的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientia Agricola
Scientia Agricola 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
78
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientia Agricola is a journal of the University of São Paulo edited at the Luiz de Queiroz campus in Piracicaba, a city in São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil. Scientia Agricola publishes original articles which contribute to the advancement of the agricultural, environmental and biological sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信