The reforms in the management of eastern monastic estates in Bessarabia (1873-1874): causes, objectives, and impact

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY
Rusin Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17223/18572685/67/8
I. Y. Smirnova
{"title":"The reforms in the management of eastern monastic estates in Bessarabia (1873-1874): causes, objectives, and impact","authors":"I. Y. Smirnova","doi":"10.17223/18572685/67/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on one of the least studied episodes in the history of diplomatic relations between Russian churches and the Eastern Patriarchates - the land estates of foreign monasteries in the Russian Empire in the 1860s-1870s. Using previously unknown materials from the Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire, the author traces the decision-making process in the Russian government departments (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of State Property, Committee of Ministers) responsible for the management of the land estates of eastern monasteries in Bessarabia in 1873-1874. It was found that the reform approved by the Imperial Decree dated March 9, 1973, was caused not only by the Decree of the 1872 Council of Constantinople on the Bulgarian schism and by the Decision of the Holy Synod of Jerusalem on the deposition of Patriarch Kyrillos II (1872), but also by the discovered abuses of authorized persons (so-called “confidants”), which resulted in the complete deforestation of the land estates, which threatened an ecological catastrophe for the entire Bessarabian region. Another objective of the reform was to suppress the financial violations of the authorized persons (the confidants), who spent a fair portion of income from the land estates in Bessarabia at their own discretion. The new regulations of the Committee of Ministers, aimed at ensuring the respect for the interests of monasteries, changed the entire system of interaction between the Russian power structures and the * The article is part of Project № 20-09-41016 supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. hierarchies of eastern monasteries in terms of management of monastic land estates within the Russian Empire. Although the Russian reform relating to the land estates in Bessarabia (1873-1874) was drastically different from the sequestration of the Moldovan-Vlachian monasteries estates by the government of Prince A. Cuza (1862), their lands and treasures performed by the government of Prince Aleksandru Cuza (1862), the decrees of the Russian government caused an extremely negative reaction from the Greek monasteries of Athos, which led to the conflict between Greece and Russia at the Holy Mount.","PeriodicalId":54120,"journal":{"name":"Rusin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rusin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/67/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on one of the least studied episodes in the history of diplomatic relations between Russian churches and the Eastern Patriarchates - the land estates of foreign monasteries in the Russian Empire in the 1860s-1870s. Using previously unknown materials from the Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire, the author traces the decision-making process in the Russian government departments (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of State Property, Committee of Ministers) responsible for the management of the land estates of eastern monasteries in Bessarabia in 1873-1874. It was found that the reform approved by the Imperial Decree dated March 9, 1973, was caused not only by the Decree of the 1872 Council of Constantinople on the Bulgarian schism and by the Decision of the Holy Synod of Jerusalem on the deposition of Patriarch Kyrillos II (1872), but also by the discovered abuses of authorized persons (so-called “confidants”), which resulted in the complete deforestation of the land estates, which threatened an ecological catastrophe for the entire Bessarabian region. Another objective of the reform was to suppress the financial violations of the authorized persons (the confidants), who spent a fair portion of income from the land estates in Bessarabia at their own discretion. The new regulations of the Committee of Ministers, aimed at ensuring the respect for the interests of monasteries, changed the entire system of interaction between the Russian power structures and the * The article is part of Project № 20-09-41016 supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. hierarchies of eastern monasteries in terms of management of monastic land estates within the Russian Empire. Although the Russian reform relating to the land estates in Bessarabia (1873-1874) was drastically different from the sequestration of the Moldovan-Vlachian monasteries estates by the government of Prince A. Cuza (1862), their lands and treasures performed by the government of Prince Aleksandru Cuza (1862), the decrees of the Russian government caused an extremely negative reaction from the Greek monasteries of Athos, which led to the conflict between Greece and Russia at the Holy Mount.
比萨拉比亚东部修道院地产管理的改革(1873-1874):原因、目标和影响
这篇文章关注的是俄罗斯教会和东方宗主教之间的外交关系史上被研究最少的一个事件——19世纪60年代至70年代俄罗斯帝国的外国修道院的土地所有权。作者利用俄罗斯帝国外交政策档案中以前未知的材料,追溯了1873年至1874年负责管理比萨拉比亚东部修道院土地的俄罗斯政府部门(外交部、国家财产部、部长委员会)的决策过程。经查明,1973年3月9日帝国法令批准的改革不仅是由1872年君士坦丁堡会议关于保加利亚分裂的法令和耶路撒冷圣主教会议关于基里洛斯二世宗主教免职的决定(1872年)引起的,而且也是由被发现的滥用被授权人(所谓的“亲信”)的行为引起的,这种行为导致土地被完全砍伐。威胁到整个比萨拉比亚地区的生态灾难。改革的另一个目标是制止被授权人(亲信)的财政违规行为,这些人根据自己的判断花掉了比萨拉比亚土地地产收入的相当一部分。部长委员会的新规定旨在确保对修道院利益的尊重,改变了俄罗斯权力结构与科学之间的整个互动系统。本文是俄罗斯基础研究基金会支持的№20-09-41016项目的一部分。东方修道院的等级制度在俄罗斯帝国内部管理修道院土地尽管俄罗斯对比萨拉比亚土地的改革(1873-1874)与A. Cuza亲王政府(1862)对摩尔多瓦-弗拉契亚修道院的扣押(其土地和宝藏由Aleksandru Cuza亲王政府(1862)执行)截然不同,但俄罗斯政府的法令引起了希腊阿陀斯修道院的极端负面反应,导致了希腊和俄罗斯在圣山的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rusin
Rusin HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
75.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信