Igor P. Eremin in the letters of Varvara P. Adrianova-Peretz to Nikolay K. Gudziy

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
V. A. Romodanovskaya
{"title":"Igor P. Eremin in the letters of Varvara P. Adrianova-Peretz to Nikolay K. Gudziy","authors":"V. A. Romodanovskaya","doi":"10.17223/18137083/80/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The school of academician Vladimir Peretz became the basis of modern historical and philological studies of the Russian Middle Ages. Varvara Adrianova-Peretz and Nikolai Gudziy were his students in Kiev and Igor Eremin at Petrograd University. The paper considers the attitude of the older generation of V. N. Peretz’s students to the younger ones by considering the example of I. P. Eremin. The research material is the long-term correspondence of Adrianova-Peretz and Gudziy stored at the Institute of Russian Literature. The letters mainly concern scholarly issues, situation in the Pushkin House, and staff of the Department of Old Russian Literature. Eremin worked in the Department since 1934. In her letters written in the 1930s, Varvara Pavlovna talks about Eremin’s participation in collective works, expresses concern about his personal life and writes about his connections with the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Since 1947, when Adrianova-Peretz took over the management of the Department, her relationship with Eremin became quite complicated. While recognizing Eremin’s talent and efficiency, Varvara Pavlovna expressed her preference in organizing the work in the Department not to V. N. Peretz’s pupils (I. P. Eremin and M. O. Skripil) but to her own, D. S. Likhachev, who became the head of the Department in 1954 to work with his own students. Eremin’s activities limited to the Pushkin House were fully concentrated on Leningrad University where he established his own school in the tradition of V. N. Peretz, with L. Dmitriev, N. Demkova, and E. Romodanovskaya being its members.","PeriodicalId":53939,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/80/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The school of academician Vladimir Peretz became the basis of modern historical and philological studies of the Russian Middle Ages. Varvara Adrianova-Peretz and Nikolai Gudziy were his students in Kiev and Igor Eremin at Petrograd University. The paper considers the attitude of the older generation of V. N. Peretz’s students to the younger ones by considering the example of I. P. Eremin. The research material is the long-term correspondence of Adrianova-Peretz and Gudziy stored at the Institute of Russian Literature. The letters mainly concern scholarly issues, situation in the Pushkin House, and staff of the Department of Old Russian Literature. Eremin worked in the Department since 1934. In her letters written in the 1930s, Varvara Pavlovna talks about Eremin’s participation in collective works, expresses concern about his personal life and writes about his connections with the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Since 1947, when Adrianova-Peretz took over the management of the Department, her relationship with Eremin became quite complicated. While recognizing Eremin’s talent and efficiency, Varvara Pavlovna expressed her preference in organizing the work in the Department not to V. N. Peretz’s pupils (I. P. Eremin and M. O. Skripil) but to her own, D. S. Likhachev, who became the head of the Department in 1954 to work with his own students. Eremin’s activities limited to the Pushkin House were fully concentrated on Leningrad University where he established his own school in the tradition of V. N. Peretz, with L. Dmitriev, N. Demkova, and E. Romodanovskaya being its members.
伊戈尔·p·埃雷明在瓦尔瓦拉·p·阿德里亚诺娃·佩雷茨给尼古拉·k·古奇的信中
弗拉基米尔·佩列茨院士的学派成为俄国中世纪现代历史和语言学研究的基础。Varvara Adrianova-Peretz和Nikolai Gudziy是他在基辅的学生,Igor Eremin是彼得格勒大学的学生。本文以埃雷明为例,考察佩雷兹的老一代学生对年轻一代学生的态度。研究资料是存放在俄罗斯文学研究所的阿德里亚诺娃-佩雷茨和古奇的长期通信。这些信件主要涉及学术问题、普希金故居的情况和古俄罗斯文学系的工作人员。埃雷明自1934年以来一直在司法部工作。瓦尔瓦拉·帕夫洛夫娜在20世纪30年代写的信中谈到了埃雷明参与集体创作,表达了对他个人生活的关注,并写到了他与乌克兰科学院的联系。自1947年阿德里亚诺娃-佩雷茨接管该部门的管理以来,她与埃雷明的关系变得相当复杂。瓦尔瓦拉·帕夫洛夫娜在认可埃雷明的才能和效率的同时,也表达了她在组织部门工作时的偏好,不是v·n·佩雷茨的学生(i·p·埃雷明和m·o·斯克里皮尔),而是她自己的学生,d·s·利哈乔夫,他在1954年成为该部门的负责人,与自己的学生一起工作。叶雷明仅限于普希金之家的活动完全集中在列宁格勒大学,在那里他按照v·n·佩雷茨的传统建立了自己的学院,由l·德米特里耶夫、n·德姆科娃和e·罗莫达诺夫斯卡娅担任成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信