Diachronic and achronic characteristics of a dull sibilant ս (s) of Old Armenian language

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Vardan Z. Petrosyan
{"title":"Diachronic and achronic characteristics of a dull sibilant ս (s) of Old Armenian language","authors":"Vardan Z. Petrosyan","doi":"10.17223/18137083/80/15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The vast majority of the Armenian words of Indo-European origin with ս (s) have the nasalized *ḱ as their prototype. By combining back-lingual prototypes (comp. *ḱ, *k, *g՛, *gh) from one side and all the sibilant prototypes (comp. *s, *(s)s, *z, *z / s, *(p)s, *s(p), *s(t), *s(kh)) from the other side, a 2 : 1 quantitative proportion can be established in favor of the posterior ones. The number of the words restored with nasalized voiceless back-lingual *ḱ is about 1.7 times higher than those restored with fricative voiceless sibilant *s. However, quantitative prevalence is not yet sufficient to consider Indo-European *ḱ the original prototype of the Armenian ս (s), thus the initial phoneme from which the Old Armenian sibilant ս (s) could have derived after the separation of Armenian from the common Indo-European language. There are two reasons preventing such a conclusion: 1) the prototype with *s is restored for numerous Armenian words in comparative Armenian studies; 2) the first and second nasalization of the Indo-European back-lingual, which also resulted in sibilant phonemes in Indo-European languages, all dating back to a later period. The twofold quantitative prevalence of the cases of transition of Indo-European *ḱ to Armenian ս (s) compared to the transition of *s > ս (s), is likely to have originated similarly to the transition from the nasalized back-lingual occlusives to fricatives and occlusive-fricatives. It was a common phenomenon not only in Armenian but also in almost all of the eastern (satəm) group languages.","PeriodicalId":53939,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/80/15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vast majority of the Armenian words of Indo-European origin with ս (s) have the nasalized *ḱ as their prototype. By combining back-lingual prototypes (comp. *ḱ, *k, *g՛, *gh) from one side and all the sibilant prototypes (comp. *s, *(s)s, *z, *z / s, *(p)s, *s(p), *s(t), *s(kh)) from the other side, a 2 : 1 quantitative proportion can be established in favor of the posterior ones. The number of the words restored with nasalized voiceless back-lingual *ḱ is about 1.7 times higher than those restored with fricative voiceless sibilant *s. However, quantitative prevalence is not yet sufficient to consider Indo-European *ḱ the original prototype of the Armenian ս (s), thus the initial phoneme from which the Old Armenian sibilant ս (s) could have derived after the separation of Armenian from the common Indo-European language. There are two reasons preventing such a conclusion: 1) the prototype with *s is restored for numerous Armenian words in comparative Armenian studies; 2) the first and second nasalization of the Indo-European back-lingual, which also resulted in sibilant phonemes in Indo-European languages, all dating back to a later period. The twofold quantitative prevalence of the cases of transition of Indo-European *ḱ to Armenian ս (s) compared to the transition of *s > ս (s), is likely to have originated similarly to the transition from the nasalized back-lingual occlusives to fricatives and occlusive-fricatives. It was a common phenomenon not only in Armenian but also in almost all of the eastern (satəm) group languages.
古亚美尼亚语中哑音的历时性和历时性特征
绝大多数源自印欧语系的亚美尼亚语单词都以鼻音化的* *为原型。将一侧的后语原型(comp. * *, *k, *g , *gh)和另一侧的所有音节原型(comp. *s, *(s)s, *z, *z / s, *(p)s, *s(p), *s(t), *s(kh))结合起来,可以建立2:1的定量比例,有利于后语原型。用带鼻音的后语无音*s恢复的单词数量大约是用摩擦音的无音*s恢复的单词数量的1.7倍。然而,数量上的流行程度还不足以认为印欧语* *是亚美尼亚语的原始原型,因此在亚美尼亚语与共同的印欧语分离后,古亚美尼亚语的音节可能是从这个音素中衍生出来的。有两个原因阻碍了这样的结论:1)在比较亚美尼亚语研究中,许多亚美尼亚语单词恢复了带有*s的原型;2)印欧语系的第一次和第二次鼻音化,这也导致了印欧语系的音节音素,所有这些都可以追溯到较晚的时期。双重定量流行的印欧语系*ḱ过渡到亚美尼亚ս(s)相比的过渡* s >ս(s),很可能是同样的转变使鼻音化back-lingual occlusives摩擦音和occlusive-fricatives。这是一个普遍的现象,不仅在亚美尼亚,而且在几乎所有的东部(sat æ m)群体语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信