CUTTING RED TAPE

P. Shaw
{"title":"CUTTING RED TAPE","authors":"P. Shaw","doi":"10.1787/9789264029798-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"9 Summary Administrative burden reduction policies are a priority on the political agenda. The removal of measures of direct state control constitutes the main source of regulatory improvement between 1998 and 2003. Now the emphasis falls on measures to remove barriers to trade, investment and entrepreneurship. This puts administrative simplification in the broader context of policies to enhance performance and productivity. There is a risk that administrative regulations that are outdated or poorly designed could impede innovation and establish barriers to entry, creating unnecessary barriers to trade, investment and economic efficiency. Administrative burdens refer to regulatory costs in the form of asking for permits, filling out forms, and reporting and notification requirements for the government. Red tape is particularly burdensome to smaller businesses and may act as a disincentive to new business start-ups. These effects are more costly in global markets, where business competitiveness can be affected by the efficiency of the domestic regulatory and administrative environment. A complete halt to regulation is not a viable option. The solution lies in the adoption of rigorous regulatory quality programmes, to create regulations that meet quality standards.","PeriodicalId":81486,"journal":{"name":"ICAO journal","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICAO journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264029798-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

9 Summary Administrative burden reduction policies are a priority on the political agenda. The removal of measures of direct state control constitutes the main source of regulatory improvement between 1998 and 2003. Now the emphasis falls on measures to remove barriers to trade, investment and entrepreneurship. This puts administrative simplification in the broader context of policies to enhance performance and productivity. There is a risk that administrative regulations that are outdated or poorly designed could impede innovation and establish barriers to entry, creating unnecessary barriers to trade, investment and economic efficiency. Administrative burdens refer to regulatory costs in the form of asking for permits, filling out forms, and reporting and notification requirements for the government. Red tape is particularly burdensome to smaller businesses and may act as a disincentive to new business start-ups. These effects are more costly in global markets, where business competitiveness can be affected by the efficiency of the domestic regulatory and administrative environment. A complete halt to regulation is not a viable option. The solution lies in the adoption of rigorous regulatory quality programmes, to create regulations that meet quality standards.
减少繁文缛节
行政减负政策是政治议程上的优先事项。取消国家直接控制措施是1998年至2003年间监管改善的主要来源。现在的重点是消除贸易、投资和创业障碍的措施。这将行政简化置于提高绩效和生产力的更广泛政策背景下。存在一种风险,即过时或设计不良的行政法规可能阻碍创新和设立进入壁垒,对贸易、投资和经济效率造成不必要的障碍。行政负担是指申请许可、填写表格、向政府报告、通知等各种形式的规制费用。繁文缛节对小型企业来说尤其沉重,可能会阻碍新企业的创业。这些影响在全球市场上代价更大,因为企业竞争力可能受到国内监管和行政环境效率的影响。完全停止监管并不是一个可行的选择。解决方案在于采用严格的监管质量计划,制定符合质量标准的法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信