Modifications to ACI 318 shear design method for prestressed concrete members: Detailed method

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
PCI Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15554/pcij68.1-01
H. Ju, Meirzhan Yershanov, Deuckhang Lee, Hyeongyeop Shin, Thomas H.-K. Hang
{"title":"Modifications to ACI 318 shear design method for prestressed concrete members: Detailed method","authors":"H. Ju, Meirzhan Yershanov, Deuckhang Lee, Hyeongyeop Shin, Thomas H.-K. Hang","doi":"10.15554/pcij68.1-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes modifications to the methods for shear design of prestressed concrete one-way members specified in American Concrete Institute’s Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) to increase applicability. The current ACI 318 shear design methods have been widely used and have a history of demonstrated safety and reliability. However, there are long-standing concerns re­garding the cumbersome computational procedures spec­ified in ACI 318, as well as the inability of the ACI 318 shear design methods to capture key influential factors. This paper provides a brief history of changes made over several decades within ACI 318 for prestressed concrete shear design and critical issues raised in previous studies. While maintaining the philosophy and safety priorities of the original pioneers in the development of shear design for prestressed concrete members, the proposed changes simplify the calculation process and provide analytical accuracies comparable to the current ACI 318 methods. These changes are affirmed by comparing the results of the modified methods with data from an extensive shear database of prestressed concrete component designs that vary in dimensional detail and material properties and shear strengths estimated using current ACI 318 methods.","PeriodicalId":54637,"journal":{"name":"PCI Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij68.1-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes modifications to the methods for shear design of prestressed concrete one-way members specified in American Concrete Institute’s Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) to increase applicability. The current ACI 318 shear design methods have been widely used and have a history of demonstrated safety and reliability. However, there are long-standing concerns re­garding the cumbersome computational procedures spec­ified in ACI 318, as well as the inability of the ACI 318 shear design methods to capture key influential factors. This paper provides a brief history of changes made over several decades within ACI 318 for prestressed concrete shear design and critical issues raised in previous studies. While maintaining the philosophy and safety priorities of the original pioneers in the development of shear design for prestressed concrete members, the proposed changes simplify the calculation process and provide analytical accuracies comparable to the current ACI 318 methods. These changes are affirmed by comparing the results of the modified methods with data from an extensive shear database of prestressed concrete component designs that vary in dimensional detail and material properties and shear strengths estimated using current ACI 318 methods.
对aci318预应力混凝土构件抗剪设计方法的修改:详细方法
本文提出对美国混凝土协会《结构混凝土建筑规范要求》(ACI 318-19)和《评注》(ACI 318R-19)中预应力混凝土单向构件抗剪设计方法进行修改,以提高适用性。目前的aci318抗剪设计方法已被广泛使用,并且具有良好的安全性和可靠性。然而,对于ACI 318中规定的繁琐计算程序以及ACI 318剪切设计方法无法捕获关键影响因素,长期存在担忧。本文简要介绍了几十年来ACI 318中预应力混凝土剪切设计的变化历史以及先前研究中提出的关键问题。在保持预应力混凝土构件剪切设计发展的原始先驱的理念和安全优先事项的同时,拟议的变化简化了计算过程,并提供与当前ACI 318方法相当的分析精度。通过将改进方法的结果与广泛的预应力混凝土构件设计剪切数据库的数据进行比较,这些数据在尺寸细节和材料特性以及使用当前ACI 318方法估计的抗剪强度方面有所不同,从而证实了这些变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PCI Journal
PCI Journal 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
自引率
9.10%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信