Experimental investigation of 0.6 in. diameter strand lifting loops

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
PCI Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.15554/PCIJ66.2-03
Sandip Chhetri, R. Chicchi, A. Osborn
{"title":"Experimental investigation of 0.6 in. diameter strand lifting loops","authors":"Sandip Chhetri, R. Chicchi, A. Osborn","doi":"10.15554/PCIJ66.2-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Very little experimental data have been published relating to the pullout capacity of prestressing strand lifting loops. To address this gap in knowledge, 13 pullout tests were conducted on strand lifting loops with 0.6 in. (15.24 mm) diameter, 270 ksi (1860 MPa) strand. Straight and bent orientations were tested for single loops at different embedment depths. Loops were embedded in 12 in. (304.8 mm) wide and 44 in. (1117.6 mm) deep concrete blocks and subjected to monotonic, static loading until failure. Marginal bond quality of the strand (18.2 kip [81 kN]), Mohs hardness (3.6), and concrete strength (3000 psi [20.7 MPa]) resulted in an average bond stress value of 400 psi (2758 kPa) at failure. Most tests exhibited pullout failure modes and adequate ductility. Three loops tested at 32 in. (812.8 mm) embedment with 6 in. (152.4 mm), 90-degree bends experienced brittle side-face blowout failures. These failures were due to inclination of the lifting, which led to a reduced edge distance. A safe uniform bond stress of 199 psi (1372 kPa) is recommended for 0.6 in. diameter strand.","PeriodicalId":54637,"journal":{"name":"PCI Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":"71-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15554/PCIJ66.2-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Very little experimental data have been published relating to the pullout capacity of prestressing strand lifting loops. To address this gap in knowledge, 13 pullout tests were conducted on strand lifting loops with 0.6 in. (15.24 mm) diameter, 270 ksi (1860 MPa) strand. Straight and bent orientations were tested for single loops at different embedment depths. Loops were embedded in 12 in. (304.8 mm) wide and 44 in. (1117.6 mm) deep concrete blocks and subjected to monotonic, static loading until failure. Marginal bond quality of the strand (18.2 kip [81 kN]), Mohs hardness (3.6), and concrete strength (3000 psi [20.7 MPa]) resulted in an average bond stress value of 400 psi (2758 kPa) at failure. Most tests exhibited pullout failure modes and adequate ductility. Three loops tested at 32 in. (812.8 mm) embedment with 6 in. (152.4 mm), 90-degree bends experienced brittle side-face blowout failures. These failures were due to inclination of the lifting, which led to a reduced edge distance. A safe uniform bond stress of 199 psi (1372 kPa) is recommended for 0.6 in. diameter strand.
实验研究0.6 in。直径绞线提升环
关于预应力钢绞线提升环的拉出能力的实验数据很少。为了解决这一知识空白,在0.6 in的绞线提升环上进行了13次拉出测试。(15.24 mm)直径,270 ksi (1860 MPa)钢绞线。在不同的埋置深度下,测试了单回路的直向和弯向。回路嵌入在12英寸。(304.8毫米)宽,44英寸。(1117.6 mm)深混凝土砌块,承受单调静荷载直至破坏。钢绞线的边际粘结质量(18.2 kip [81 kN])、莫氏硬度(3.6)和混凝土强度(3000 psi [20.7 MPa])导致断裂时的平均粘结应力值为400 psi (2758 kPa)。大多数试验显示出拉出破坏模式和足够的延性。在32英寸处测试了三个环。(812.8毫米)嵌入6英寸。(152.4 mm), 90度弯道发生了脆性侧面井喷破坏。这些故障是由于举升的倾斜导致边缘距离减小。对于0.6 in套管,推荐的安全均匀粘结应力为199psi (1372kpa)。直径链。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PCI Journal
PCI Journal 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
自引率
9.10%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信