Student Perceptions of a Synchronous Online Learning Experience: How Does It Compare?

Q4 Social Sciences
J. Sand
{"title":"Student Perceptions of a Synchronous Online Learning Experience: How Does It Compare?","authors":"J. Sand","doi":"10.18848/2327-0144/cgp/v29i02/45-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic forced educational institutions to expand virtual learning options, with many providing more synchronous online courses using video conferencing technology. This case study explores the student experience in a newly synchronous online course using live remote sessions and compares their perceptions of learning in that environment with traditional in-person and asynchronous online courses. Learning more about the student experience in classrooms of various modalities is important as institutions continue to expand virtual learning options in higher education and workforce training. Students responded to an online survey, and responses were summarized and described categorically and descriptively. Albeit limited to a single course, the overall student response rated their experience in a synchronous online course at or below a traditional classroom learning experience. The live sessions did not adequately address the common shortfalls that often come with asynchronous online learning, including building a sense of community and connectedness with the instructor and fellow classmates. Due to the unprecedented times, the synchronous online modality was the only option provided to students for this class. Virtual learning opportunities are essential to meet the diverse needs of students in higher education, but synchronous online learning is not an automatic substitution for an in-person experience;students should be provided multiple modalities to choose the classroom environment that best fits their learning style.","PeriodicalId":53502,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technologies in Learning","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technologies in Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/cgp/v29i02/45-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic forced educational institutions to expand virtual learning options, with many providing more synchronous online courses using video conferencing technology. This case study explores the student experience in a newly synchronous online course using live remote sessions and compares their perceptions of learning in that environment with traditional in-person and asynchronous online courses. Learning more about the student experience in classrooms of various modalities is important as institutions continue to expand virtual learning options in higher education and workforce training. Students responded to an online survey, and responses were summarized and described categorically and descriptively. Albeit limited to a single course, the overall student response rated their experience in a synchronous online course at or below a traditional classroom learning experience. The live sessions did not adequately address the common shortfalls that often come with asynchronous online learning, including building a sense of community and connectedness with the instructor and fellow classmates. Due to the unprecedented times, the synchronous online modality was the only option provided to students for this class. Virtual learning opportunities are essential to meet the diverse needs of students in higher education, but synchronous online learning is not an automatic substitution for an in-person experience;students should be provided multiple modalities to choose the classroom environment that best fits their learning style.
学生对同步在线学习体验的看法:如何比较?
2019冠状病毒病大流行迫使教育机构扩大虚拟学习选择,许多机构使用视频会议技术提供更多同步在线课程。本案例研究探讨了使用实时远程会话的新同步在线课程的学生体验,并比较了他们在该环境中与传统面对面和异步在线课程学习的看法。随着各机构在高等教育和劳动力培训中不断扩大虚拟学习选择,更多地了解学生在各种形式的课堂上的体验非常重要。学生们回答了一项在线调查,并对他们的回答进行了总结和描述。尽管仅限于一门课程,但学生们对同步在线课程的总体评价相当于或低于传统课堂学习体验。实时课程并没有充分解决异步在线学习的常见缺陷,包括建立一种社区意识,以及与教师和同学的联系。由于前所未有的时代,同步在线模式是提供给学生这门课的唯一选择。在高等教育中,虚拟学习机会对于满足学生的多样化需求至关重要,但同步在线学习并不能自动取代面对面的学习体验;应该为学生提供多种模式,让他们选择最适合自己学习风格的课堂环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Technologies in Learning explores the role of technologies in learning and processes of learning about and through technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信