Features of Psychological Health of Students from the Perspective of Personal Resources Development: Basic Beliefs, Resilience, and Personal Regulatory Characteristics

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
I. A. Filenko, S. A. Bogomaz, E. Galazhinsky, N. A. Buravleva, T. E. Levitskaya, A.A. Chalimova
{"title":"Features of Psychological Health of Students from the Perspective of Personal Resources Development: Basic Beliefs, Resilience, and Personal Regulatory Characteristics","authors":"I. A. Filenko, S. A. Bogomaz, E. Galazhinsky, N. A. Buravleva, T. E. Levitskaya, A.A. Chalimova","doi":"10.17223/17267080/88/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to study the psychological health of modern youth in order to identify subgroups that significantly differ in this characteristic, as well as the features of psychological resources that support its optimal functioning. The study was conducted in September-October 2022. The study sample included 340 students from Tomsk, ages from 17 to 26 (the mean age was 20.7±2.07 years) and men were 50% of the sample. Research methods: The Mental Health Continuum questionnaire, MHC-SF (C.L.M. Keyes, adapted by E.N. Osin); World Assumption Scale, WAS (R. Janoff-Bulman, adapted by O. Kravtsova); Intellectual Risk Assessment questionnaire (G. Craparo, P. Magnano, A. Paolillo et al., adapted by T.V. Kornilova, E. M. Pavlova); Hardiness Test (S.R. Maddi, D.M. Khoshaba, adapted by D.A. Leontiev, E.I. Rasskazova, short version by E.N. Osin); Personal Readiness for Activity questionnaire (S.A. Bogomaz). Factor and cluster analyses were applied. As a result of the use of factor analysis two factors were revealed: 1) resources for psychological well-being (including indicators of Psychological well-being, Self-worth, Risktaking, Self-efficacy, Goal setting) and 2) resources Social well-being (including indicators of Social well-being, Justice of the world, Benevolence of people) of young people. A comparative analysis of the measured characteristics of male and female revealed statistically significant differences in Self-efficacy (3.35-male and 3.2-female), Goal setting (3.72 and 3.5, respectively), and Benevolence of people (3.71 and 4.1, respectively). The use of cluster analysis made it possible to identify 6 clusters in groups of male and female, whose representatives differed in the average values of the studied variables at a statistically significant level. Based on the analysis of the psychological characteristics of respondents belonging to specific clusters, risk groups which characterized low levels of development of structural components of Psychological and Social well-being resources (45 male and 46 female) were identified.","PeriodicalId":42898,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/88/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the study is to study the psychological health of modern youth in order to identify subgroups that significantly differ in this characteristic, as well as the features of psychological resources that support its optimal functioning. The study was conducted in September-October 2022. The study sample included 340 students from Tomsk, ages from 17 to 26 (the mean age was 20.7±2.07 years) and men were 50% of the sample. Research methods: The Mental Health Continuum questionnaire, MHC-SF (C.L.M. Keyes, adapted by E.N. Osin); World Assumption Scale, WAS (R. Janoff-Bulman, adapted by O. Kravtsova); Intellectual Risk Assessment questionnaire (G. Craparo, P. Magnano, A. Paolillo et al., adapted by T.V. Kornilova, E. M. Pavlova); Hardiness Test (S.R. Maddi, D.M. Khoshaba, adapted by D.A. Leontiev, E.I. Rasskazova, short version by E.N. Osin); Personal Readiness for Activity questionnaire (S.A. Bogomaz). Factor and cluster analyses were applied. As a result of the use of factor analysis two factors were revealed: 1) resources for psychological well-being (including indicators of Psychological well-being, Self-worth, Risktaking, Self-efficacy, Goal setting) and 2) resources Social well-being (including indicators of Social well-being, Justice of the world, Benevolence of people) of young people. A comparative analysis of the measured characteristics of male and female revealed statistically significant differences in Self-efficacy (3.35-male and 3.2-female), Goal setting (3.72 and 3.5, respectively), and Benevolence of people (3.71 and 4.1, respectively). The use of cluster analysis made it possible to identify 6 clusters in groups of male and female, whose representatives differed in the average values of the studied variables at a statistically significant level. Based on the analysis of the psychological characteristics of respondents belonging to specific clusters, risk groups which characterized low levels of development of structural components of Psychological and Social well-being resources (45 male and 46 female) were identified.
个人资源开发视角下大学生心理健康特征:基本信念、弹性和个人调节特征
本研究的目的是研究现代青年的心理健康状况,以确定在这一特征上存在显著差异的亚群体,以及支持其最佳功能的心理资源的特征。该研究于2022年9月至10月进行。研究样本包括来自托木斯克的340名学生,年龄从17岁到26岁(平均年龄20.7±2.07岁),男性占样本的50%。研究方法:心理健康连续问卷,MHC-SF (C.L.M. Keyes, E.N. Osin改编);世界假设量表,WAS (R. Janoff-Bulman, O. Kravtsova改编);智力风险评估问卷(G. Craparo, P. Magnano, A. Paolillo等,改编自T.V. Kornilova, e.m. Pavlova);《抗寒性测试》(S.R. madi, D.M. Khoshaba, d.a Leontiev, E.I. Rasskazova改编,E.N. Osin短版);个人活动准备问卷(S.A. Bogomaz)。采用因子分析和聚类分析。因子分析揭示了青少年心理幸福感资源(包括心理幸福感指标、自我价值感指标、冒险性指标、自我效能感指标、目标设定指标)和社会幸福感资源(包括社会幸福感指标、世界公正性指标、人的仁爱性指标)。对比分析男性和女性的测量特征,发现自我效能感(男性3.35分,女性3.2分)、目标设定(男性3.72分,女性3.5分)和仁爱(男性3.71分,女性4.1分)的差异有统计学意义。使用聚类分析可以在男性和女性组中确定6个聚类,其代表在研究变量的平均值上存在统计学显著水平的差异。在分析被调查者心理特征的基础上,确定了心理和社会福利资源结构成分发展水平较低的风险群体(男性45人,女性46人)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信