Psychosemantic Markers of Deficiency in Self-Regulation Components during Situations of Increasing Uncertainty

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
O. M. Krasnoryadtseva, Azamat B. Najman
{"title":"Psychosemantic Markers of Deficiency in Self-Regulation Components during Situations of Increasing Uncertainty","authors":"O. M. Krasnoryadtseva, Azamat B. Najman","doi":"10.17223/17267080/85/10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to develop and test an express diagnostic method for determining psychosemantic markers of self-regulation components deficiency in clients during an online counseling situation. The article describes the specifics of the population's appeals to psychological services from universities for psychological help since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. It shows that people's requests have a different focus: problems with behavior, problems with cognitive functions, problems with emotions, will, motivation, etc. However, a common component in all requests is a pronounced lack of self-regulatory resources in solving problems that arise in situations of increasing uncertainty. The study results of psychosemantic markers of components deficiency in human selfregulation during situations of increasing uncertainty are presented. The relevance of the results of the components deficiency in human self-regulation is determined by the fact that self-regulation is an important resource of an individual, which contributes to successful adaptation to various life difficulties and situations, including situations of forced increasing uncertainty such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the analysis of various theoretical works and empirical studies, 4 main groups of deficits (deficiencies) of self-regulation, characteristic of people in a situation of increasing uncertainty, were identified: deficiency of the operational component of self-regulation, deficiency of the emotional-volitional component of selfregulation, deficiency of the motivational component of self-regulation and deficiency in the individual-personal component of self-regulation. This empirical study of psychosemantic markers of deficiency in self-regulation components was carried out using the method of content analysis of requests from people who applied for help to the TSU psychological service during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was noted that the number of deficiencies in different people are both minimal (only 1 type of deficiency occurs) and maximum (all 4 identified types of deficiency occur). Thus, the predominant type of deficiency among people who applied for help to the psychological service of TSU was the deficit of the emotional-volitional component of self-regulation, namely, problems with the regulation of fear, anxiety and aggression. This fact indicates that the situation of uncertainty to a greater extent affected the emotional component of the psyche. In addition, it is the selfregulation of emotions that is one of the most complex types of self-regulation, and this is probably why there are more related requests to it. The deficit of the operational component of self-regulation was the least common. The novelty of the study is the indications psycho-semantic tools, which allows collecting diagnostic information in the course of working with a client on an online consultative platform.","PeriodicalId":42898,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/85/10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the study is to develop and test an express diagnostic method for determining psychosemantic markers of self-regulation components deficiency in clients during an online counseling situation. The article describes the specifics of the population's appeals to psychological services from universities for psychological help since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. It shows that people's requests have a different focus: problems with behavior, problems with cognitive functions, problems with emotions, will, motivation, etc. However, a common component in all requests is a pronounced lack of self-regulatory resources in solving problems that arise in situations of increasing uncertainty. The study results of psychosemantic markers of components deficiency in human selfregulation during situations of increasing uncertainty are presented. The relevance of the results of the components deficiency in human self-regulation is determined by the fact that self-regulation is an important resource of an individual, which contributes to successful adaptation to various life difficulties and situations, including situations of forced increasing uncertainty such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the analysis of various theoretical works and empirical studies, 4 main groups of deficits (deficiencies) of self-regulation, characteristic of people in a situation of increasing uncertainty, were identified: deficiency of the operational component of self-regulation, deficiency of the emotional-volitional component of selfregulation, deficiency of the motivational component of self-regulation and deficiency in the individual-personal component of self-regulation. This empirical study of psychosemantic markers of deficiency in self-regulation components was carried out using the method of content analysis of requests from people who applied for help to the TSU psychological service during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was noted that the number of deficiencies in different people are both minimal (only 1 type of deficiency occurs) and maximum (all 4 identified types of deficiency occur). Thus, the predominant type of deficiency among people who applied for help to the psychological service of TSU was the deficit of the emotional-volitional component of self-regulation, namely, problems with the regulation of fear, anxiety and aggression. This fact indicates that the situation of uncertainty to a greater extent affected the emotional component of the psyche. In addition, it is the selfregulation of emotions that is one of the most complex types of self-regulation, and this is probably why there are more related requests to it. The deficit of the operational component of self-regulation was the least common. The novelty of the study is the indications psycho-semantic tools, which allows collecting diagnostic information in the course of working with a client on an online consultative platform.
不确定性增加时自我调节成分缺失的心理语义标记
本研究的目的是开发和测试一种快速诊断方法,以确定在线咨询情况下客户自我调节成分缺乏的心理语义标记。文章介绍了新冠肺炎疫情发生以来,群众向高校心理服务机构求助的具体情况。这表明人们的要求有不同的焦点:行为问题、认知功能问题、情感、意志、动机问题等。然而,所有要求的一个共同组成部分是,在解决日益不确定的情况下出现的问题时明显缺乏自律资源。本文介绍了不确定性增加情况下人类自我调节成分缺失的心理语义标记的研究结果。自我调节是个人的一项重要资源,有助于成功适应各种生活困难和情况,包括COVID-19大流行等被迫增加不确定性的情况,这一事实决定了人类自我调节成分缺失结果的相关性。通过对各种理论著作和实证研究的分析,确定了人们在不确定性增加的情况下所表现出的自我调节缺陷(缺陷)的4个主要类别:自我调节的操作成分的缺陷、自我调节的情绪-意志成分的缺陷、自我调节的动机成分的缺陷和自我调节的个人-个人成分的缺陷。本研究采用内容分析方法,对新冠肺炎疫情期间向托大心理服务机构求助的人群进行自我调节成分缺失的心理语义标记进行实证研究。人们注意到,不同人的缺乏症数量既有最少的(只有一种缺乏症发生),也有最多的(所有四种已确定的缺乏症都发生)。因此,在向托国立心理服务机构申请帮助的人群中,主要的缺陷类型是自我调节的情绪-意志成分的缺陷,即恐惧、焦虑和攻击的调节问题。这一事实表明,不确定的情况在更大程度上影响了心理的情感成分。此外,情绪的自我调节是最复杂的自我调节类型之一,这可能就是为什么有更多相关的请求。自我监管业务部分的不足是最不常见的。这项研究的新颖之处在于心理语义工具的适应症,它允许在在线咨询平台上与客户合作的过程中收集诊断信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信