Adolescent Aggression towards Teachers: Experience of Victimization and Connections with Personality Factors

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Rean, Anna V. Egorova, I. Konovalov, Roman G. Kuz'min
{"title":"Adolescent Aggression towards Teachers: Experience of Victimization and Connections with Personality Factors","authors":"A. Rean, Anna V. Egorova, I. Konovalov, Roman G. Kuz'min","doi":"10.17223/17267080/85/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This article is devoted to a theoretical and empirical study of the problem of aggression against teachers. Within the framework of the article, the following research questions were posed: what is the frequency of these manifestations of aggressive behavior toward Russian teachers? Is the frequency of these manifestations of aggression toward teachers related to the teachers characteristics, in particular, because of their own aggressiveness? Methods. The study was implemented as an anonymous online survey, which included teachers from nine regions and five federal districts of the Russian Federation. The sample of respondents consisted of 5086 teachers. The vast majority of respondents were female (94%). The Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) adapted by S.N. Enikolopov and N.P. Tsibulsky was used to assess the aggressiveness indicators of teachers. To assess the specifics of teachers' ideas about the problematic behavior of students, we used the questionnaire developed by the Center for Socialization, Family and Prevention of Antisocial Behavior from Moscow State Pedagogical University. The Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey tests were used as the principal method of statistical data processing. Results. Among the most common forms of aggressive behavior against teachers, the following stand out: systematic violation of discipline, ignoring and refusing to fulfill the requirements of a teacher. A tendency towards an increase in the probability of perceiving various manifestations of aggression against oneself with an increase in the level of various components of the teacher's aggressiveness (a tendency to physical aggression, anger and hostility) became apparent. Discussion. The data obtained are considered in the context of various socio-psychological phenomena: projection, hostile attribution, the Rosenthal effect. Conclusions. A connection was found between indicators of teachers' aggressiveness and their subjective assessment of the frequency of conflicts with adolescents. The relationships between teachers' propensity for physical aggression, anger and hostility with manifestations of aggression towards a teacher from students such as negative attitude, disregard, direct and indirect aggression.","PeriodicalId":42898,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/85/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. This article is devoted to a theoretical and empirical study of the problem of aggression against teachers. Within the framework of the article, the following research questions were posed: what is the frequency of these manifestations of aggressive behavior toward Russian teachers? Is the frequency of these manifestations of aggression toward teachers related to the teachers characteristics, in particular, because of their own aggressiveness? Methods. The study was implemented as an anonymous online survey, which included teachers from nine regions and five federal districts of the Russian Federation. The sample of respondents consisted of 5086 teachers. The vast majority of respondents were female (94%). The Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) adapted by S.N. Enikolopov and N.P. Tsibulsky was used to assess the aggressiveness indicators of teachers. To assess the specifics of teachers' ideas about the problematic behavior of students, we used the questionnaire developed by the Center for Socialization, Family and Prevention of Antisocial Behavior from Moscow State Pedagogical University. The Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey tests were used as the principal method of statistical data processing. Results. Among the most common forms of aggressive behavior against teachers, the following stand out: systematic violation of discipline, ignoring and refusing to fulfill the requirements of a teacher. A tendency towards an increase in the probability of perceiving various manifestations of aggression against oneself with an increase in the level of various components of the teacher's aggressiveness (a tendency to physical aggression, anger and hostility) became apparent. Discussion. The data obtained are considered in the context of various socio-psychological phenomena: projection, hostile attribution, the Rosenthal effect. Conclusions. A connection was found between indicators of teachers' aggressiveness and their subjective assessment of the frequency of conflicts with adolescents. The relationships between teachers' propensity for physical aggression, anger and hostility with manifestations of aggression towards a teacher from students such as negative attitude, disregard, direct and indirect aggression.
青少年对教师的攻击:受害经历及其与人格因素的关系
目标。本文从理论和实证两方面对教师攻击问题进行了研究。在本文的框架内,提出了以下研究问题:这些针对俄语教师的攻击行为表现的频率是多少?这些对教师的攻击表现的频率是否与教师的特征有关,特别是因为他们自己的攻击性?方法。这项研究是以匿名在线调查的形式进行的,调查对象包括俄罗斯联邦9个地区和5个联邦区的教师。调查对象包括5086名教师。绝大多数受访者是女性(94%)。采用Enikolopov和N.P. Tsibulsky编写的Buss Perry攻击性问卷(BPAQ)来评估教师的攻击性指标。为了评估教师对学生问题行为的具体看法,我们使用了莫斯科国立师范大学社会化、家庭和反社会行为预防中心开发的问卷。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Tukey检验作为统计数据处理的主要方法。结果。在针对教师的最常见的攻击行为形式中,以下几种最为突出:系统地违反纪律,忽视和拒绝履行教师的要求。随着教师攻击性的各种成分(身体攻击、愤怒和敌意的倾向)水平的增加,感知到对自己的各种攻击表现的可能性增加的趋势变得明显。讨论。所获得的数据被考虑在各种社会心理现象的背景下:投射,敌对归因,罗森塔尔效应。结论。研究发现,教师攻击性指标与教师对青少年冲突频率的主观评价之间存在联系。教师身体攻击、愤怒和敌意倾向与学生对教师的消极态度、漠视、直接和间接攻击等攻击表现的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信