The reformist character of the temperance movement in Russia in the “path choice” period in 1907-1914

IF 0.1 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Alexandr L. Afanasev
{"title":"The reformist character of the temperance movement in Russia in the “path choice” period in 1907-1914","authors":"Alexandr L. Afanasev","doi":"10.17223/15617793/480/11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to prove the author's hypothesis that the vast temperance movement (TM) increased the potential of the reformist development in Russia. The objective is to learn the exact mechanism of its influence on the society. The research methodology includes analysis, synthesis, objectivity, historicism and interdisciplinarity. The sources of the material are: reports and periodicals of temperance societies, papers by the movement participants, notes of the anti-alcohol congresses, articles by administrative bodies, newspapers. The analyzed territory is Russia without Poland and Finland. TM was the society's response to the alcohol policy by the tsarism. Its influence was increasing. As of 1 January 1911, there were 1,873 temperance societies in Russia with nearly 500,000 members. 74.5 % of the societies were located in villages with most members from the peasantry; 25.5 % were in urban settlements, with most members from workers. 1,782 societies (95.14 % of the total number) were religious with 1,771 of them Orthodox. Their leaders were mostly priests. Of 91 civil societies, 56 were Estonian, 15 Latvian, 2 Finnish and 18 international ones. The manifestation and outcomes of the movement were the following. (A) Locally, (1) the participants of the movement adopted a sober lifestyle, peace and wealth came into families; (2) the participants became a part of a group of soulmates, many of them found a high meaning of life; (3) some societies were involved in educational and charity work; (4) the societies encouraged people to take part in useful activities; (5) due to the societies' impact, open alcohol abuse, hooliganism and criminal activity were decreasing, sober traditions were emerging, communities made public verdicts to close down state wine stores and to ban illegal alcohol sale. (B) On the state and regional levels, on 11 December 1907 the III State Duma established the Anti-alcohol Panel. On 16 November 1911 the Duma adopted the law providing for essential educational and restrictive measures. In 1909-1912 All-Russia congresses against alcohol abuse were held. In 1913-1914 abstinence festivals in both capitals and in more than 50 other provinces were organized. Nicholas II saw the movement as a way to reinforce the political situation in the country; in April 1913 he began to openly support it and in January 1914 proceeded to change the alcohol policy in the country. A circular of the Minister of Finance of 11 March 1914 indicated that it was necessary to satisfy the petitions of rural societies to ban the sale of vodka on their territory. In February-July 1914, the government approved 800 such petitions. A campaign began, during which local governments and state authorities took new educational and restrictive anti-alcohol measures. So, the temperance movement, reformist in character, contributed to the improvement and strengthening of Russia. It urged the authorities to take measures that increased the stability of society and the possibility of development along a peaceful path. This was the “rise of Order out of Chaos”. At the same time, during the rapid anti-alcohol campaign of 1914, opposite processes began.","PeriodicalId":45402,"journal":{"name":"Tomsk State University Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomsk State University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/480/11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to prove the author's hypothesis that the vast temperance movement (TM) increased the potential of the reformist development in Russia. The objective is to learn the exact mechanism of its influence on the society. The research methodology includes analysis, synthesis, objectivity, historicism and interdisciplinarity. The sources of the material are: reports and periodicals of temperance societies, papers by the movement participants, notes of the anti-alcohol congresses, articles by administrative bodies, newspapers. The analyzed territory is Russia without Poland and Finland. TM was the society's response to the alcohol policy by the tsarism. Its influence was increasing. As of 1 January 1911, there were 1,873 temperance societies in Russia with nearly 500,000 members. 74.5 % of the societies were located in villages with most members from the peasantry; 25.5 % were in urban settlements, with most members from workers. 1,782 societies (95.14 % of the total number) were religious with 1,771 of them Orthodox. Their leaders were mostly priests. Of 91 civil societies, 56 were Estonian, 15 Latvian, 2 Finnish and 18 international ones. The manifestation and outcomes of the movement were the following. (A) Locally, (1) the participants of the movement adopted a sober lifestyle, peace and wealth came into families; (2) the participants became a part of a group of soulmates, many of them found a high meaning of life; (3) some societies were involved in educational and charity work; (4) the societies encouraged people to take part in useful activities; (5) due to the societies' impact, open alcohol abuse, hooliganism and criminal activity were decreasing, sober traditions were emerging, communities made public verdicts to close down state wine stores and to ban illegal alcohol sale. (B) On the state and regional levels, on 11 December 1907 the III State Duma established the Anti-alcohol Panel. On 16 November 1911 the Duma adopted the law providing for essential educational and restrictive measures. In 1909-1912 All-Russia congresses against alcohol abuse were held. In 1913-1914 abstinence festivals in both capitals and in more than 50 other provinces were organized. Nicholas II saw the movement as a way to reinforce the political situation in the country; in April 1913 he began to openly support it and in January 1914 proceeded to change the alcohol policy in the country. A circular of the Minister of Finance of 11 March 1914 indicated that it was necessary to satisfy the petitions of rural societies to ban the sale of vodka on their territory. In February-July 1914, the government approved 800 such petitions. A campaign began, during which local governments and state authorities took new educational and restrictive anti-alcohol measures. So, the temperance movement, reformist in character, contributed to the improvement and strengthening of Russia. It urged the authorities to take measures that increased the stability of society and the possibility of development along a peaceful path. This was the “rise of Order out of Chaos”. At the same time, during the rapid anti-alcohol campaign of 1914, opposite processes began.
1907-1914年“道路选择”时期俄国禁酒运动的改良主义特征
这篇文章的目的是为了证明作者的假设,即大规模的禁酒运动(TM)增加了俄罗斯改良主义发展的潜力。其目的是了解其对社会影响的确切机制。研究方法包括分析、综合、客观、历史主义和跨学科。材料的来源是:禁酒协会的报告和期刊、运动参与者的论文、禁酒大会的记录、行政机构的文章、报纸。分析的领土是俄罗斯,不包括波兰和芬兰。TM是社会对沙皇专制的酒精政策的回应。它的影响越来越大。截至1911年1月1日,俄国有1873个禁酒协会,会员近50万人。74.5%的社团设在以农民为主要成员的村庄;25.5%的人住在城市定居点,其中大多数是工人。宗教社团1782个,占社团总数的95.14%,其中东正教社团1771个。他们的领袖大多是牧师。在91个民间社会中,56个是爱沙尼亚的,15个是拉脱维亚的,2个是芬兰的,18个是国际的。运动的表现形式和结果如下。(A)在当地,(1)运动的参与者采取了清醒的生活方式,和平与财富进入家庭;(2)参与者成为一群灵魂伴侣的一部分,他们中的许多人发现了生活的高度意义;(3)一些社团参与教育和慈善工作;(4)社会鼓励人们参加有益的活动;(5)由于社会的影响,公开酗酒、流氓行为和犯罪活动正在减少,戒酒传统正在兴起,社区公开决定关闭州立葡萄酒商店并禁止非法销售酒精。(B)在州和地区两级,1907年12月11日,第三届国家杜马成立了禁酒小组。1911年11月16日,杜马通过了一项法律,规定了必要的教育和限制措施。1909-1912年举行了全俄反对酗酒大会。1913年至1914年,两国首都和其他50多个省份都组织了禁欲节。尼古拉二世认为这场运动是加强国家政治局势的一种方式;1913年4月,他开始公开支持它,并于1914年1月开始改变该国的酒精政策。1914年3月11日财政部长的一份通知指出,必须满足农村社会禁止在其领土上销售伏特加酒的请愿。1914年2月至7月间,政府批准了800份这样的请愿书。一场运动开始了,在此期间,地方政府和州当局采取了新的教育和限制性禁酒措施。因此,具有改良主义性质的禁酒运动为俄国的改善和加强做出了贡献。它敦促当局采取措施,增加社会的稳定和沿着和平道路发展的可能性。这就是“混乱中秩序的崛起”。与此同时,在1914年迅速的反酒精运动中,相反的进程开始了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tomsk State University Journal
Tomsk State University Journal MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信