Materials of bronze foundry of the Paleometal Epoch in the Kiya River valley and new data about elemental composition of bronzes from the Shestakovo I burial ground

IF 0.1 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
A. S. Savelieva
{"title":"Materials of bronze foundry of the Paleometal Epoch in the Kiya River valley and new data about elemental composition of bronzes from the Shestakovo I burial ground","authors":"A. S. Savelieva","doi":"10.17223/15617793/480/16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Mariinsk forest-steppe and on its western periphery in the valley of the Kiya River archaeological communities of the Upper Ob, Middle Yenisei, northern taiga and southern steppe interacted in ancient times. This historical and cultural region is commonly referred to as “contact”, “transit” or “marginal”. To study the influence of such specifics on bronze foundry, the author reviewed materials on bronze foundry production in the valley of the Kiya River and also studied bronzes from the Shestakovo I burial ground, the most western burial ground of the Tagar culture, to reveal whether the regional specificity affected the development of the Tagar metallurgy. The analysis of the sources on bronze foundry showed that bronze objects on the Bronze Age sites are rare - a fragment of a knife, a celt from the settlement Archekas III, copper splash and slag from the settlement Ustye-Kozhukha I, objects of an unclear fate from the settlements Novoaleksandrovka and Archekas II. To the east of the valley of the Kiya River, up to the Uryup River, the complex of relevant materials is wider and is represented by traces of metal production from the settlements Dvornikovo and Tambar III. The picture of the “metal content” of the sites of the Kiya River valley in the Early Iron Age is different. More than 600 bronze objects from the burials of the Tagar and Tashtyk cultures are dated to this time. Single traces of bronze casting are known from the settlements -slag, stone tools, a clay core for casting socketed products from the fortified settlement Shestakovo I and the settlement Shestakovo II. To the east of the valley of the Kiya River, things (thousands of objects) from burial grounds also predominate. Bronze objects from settlements come, for example, from Tretyakovo I, Utinka I. Thus, in the structure of data on bronze foundry in the northeast of Kemerovo Oblast, the sources are distributed unevenly both chronologically and geographically. This is the reason for the reconstruction of local non-ferrous metallurgy based on data on bronze objects and on the elemental composition of their alloys. Metal from the burials of the Tagar culture of the Kiya valley, the Shestakovo I burial ground, was studied for the first time (excavations by A.I. Martynov, 1968). The elemental composition of 39 shafthole pickaxes, adzes and knives from Kurgan 4 was studied. The chemical-metallurgical groups of “pure” copper, arsenic, tin and tin-lead bronzes were distinguished. Copper items and arsenic-bronze shafthole pickaxe come only from Grave 1. This is explained by its later relative dating. The alloying of copper with tin, fixed in the metal of Graves 2, 3 and 4, is traditional for the Saragashen Stage of the Tagar culture (5th-4th centuries BC). The metal of Grave 1 makes it possible to “catch” the emergence of a trend towards the manufacture of implements from arsenic bronze and copper, characteristic of the Lepeshkino Stage (3th-2th centuries BC) and later of the Tesinsky burial complexes (end of the 2nd century BC - 2nd century AD). Thus, this section of the Kiya River's basin saw the same process as the rest of the steppe and forest-steppe areas of the Tagar tribes, namely, a decrease in the proportion of bronzes alloyed with tin in the 3rd-2nd centuries BC.","PeriodicalId":45402,"journal":{"name":"Tomsk State University Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomsk State University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/480/16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Mariinsk forest-steppe and on its western periphery in the valley of the Kiya River archaeological communities of the Upper Ob, Middle Yenisei, northern taiga and southern steppe interacted in ancient times. This historical and cultural region is commonly referred to as “contact”, “transit” or “marginal”. To study the influence of such specifics on bronze foundry, the author reviewed materials on bronze foundry production in the valley of the Kiya River and also studied bronzes from the Shestakovo I burial ground, the most western burial ground of the Tagar culture, to reveal whether the regional specificity affected the development of the Tagar metallurgy. The analysis of the sources on bronze foundry showed that bronze objects on the Bronze Age sites are rare - a fragment of a knife, a celt from the settlement Archekas III, copper splash and slag from the settlement Ustye-Kozhukha I, objects of an unclear fate from the settlements Novoaleksandrovka and Archekas II. To the east of the valley of the Kiya River, up to the Uryup River, the complex of relevant materials is wider and is represented by traces of metal production from the settlements Dvornikovo and Tambar III. The picture of the “metal content” of the sites of the Kiya River valley in the Early Iron Age is different. More than 600 bronze objects from the burials of the Tagar and Tashtyk cultures are dated to this time. Single traces of bronze casting are known from the settlements -slag, stone tools, a clay core for casting socketed products from the fortified settlement Shestakovo I and the settlement Shestakovo II. To the east of the valley of the Kiya River, things (thousands of objects) from burial grounds also predominate. Bronze objects from settlements come, for example, from Tretyakovo I, Utinka I. Thus, in the structure of data on bronze foundry in the northeast of Kemerovo Oblast, the sources are distributed unevenly both chronologically and geographically. This is the reason for the reconstruction of local non-ferrous metallurgy based on data on bronze objects and on the elemental composition of their alloys. Metal from the burials of the Tagar culture of the Kiya valley, the Shestakovo I burial ground, was studied for the first time (excavations by A.I. Martynov, 1968). The elemental composition of 39 shafthole pickaxes, adzes and knives from Kurgan 4 was studied. The chemical-metallurgical groups of “pure” copper, arsenic, tin and tin-lead bronzes were distinguished. Copper items and arsenic-bronze shafthole pickaxe come only from Grave 1. This is explained by its later relative dating. The alloying of copper with tin, fixed in the metal of Graves 2, 3 and 4, is traditional for the Saragashen Stage of the Tagar culture (5th-4th centuries BC). The metal of Grave 1 makes it possible to “catch” the emergence of a trend towards the manufacture of implements from arsenic bronze and copper, characteristic of the Lepeshkino Stage (3th-2th centuries BC) and later of the Tesinsky burial complexes (end of the 2nd century BC - 2nd century AD). Thus, this section of the Kiya River's basin saw the same process as the rest of the steppe and forest-steppe areas of the Tagar tribes, namely, a decrease in the proportion of bronzes alloyed with tin in the 3rd-2nd centuries BC.
基雅河谷古金属时代青铜器铸造材料及舍斯塔科沃1号墓地青铜器元素组成新数据
在马林斯克森林草原及其西部边缘的基耶河河谷考古群落的上鄂,叶尼塞中部,北部针叶林和南部草原在古代相互作用。这个历史文化区域通常被称为“接触”、“中转”或“边缘”。为了研究这种特殊性对青铜铸造的影响,笔者回顾了基雅河谷地区的青铜铸造生产资料,并研究了塔格尔文化最西侧的舍斯塔科沃1号墓葬的青铜器,以揭示地域特殊性是否影响了塔格尔冶金的发展。对青铜器铸造来源的分析表明,青铜器时代遗址上的青铜器非常罕见——一把刀的碎片,阿卡卡斯III定居点的一个细胞,乌斯季-科朱卡I定居点的铜飞溅和渣,Novoaleksandrovka和阿卡卡斯II定居点的命运不明的物体。在Kiya河河谷以东,直到Uryup河,相关材料的复杂程度更广,并以Dvornikovo和Tambar III定居点的金属生产痕迹为代表。铁器时代早期,基雅河谷遗址的“金属含量”情况有所不同。从塔加尔和塔什提克文化墓葬中出土的600多件青铜器可以追溯到这个时期。单一的青铜铸造痕迹从定居点中被发现——矿渣、石器、用于铸造镶嵌产品的粘土芯,这些产品来自强化定居点谢斯塔科沃I和谢斯塔科沃II。在Kiya河山谷的东部,来自墓地的东西(数千件物品)也占主导地位。例如,从定居点出土的青铜器来自于特列季亚科沃一号、乌廷卡一号。因此,在克麦罗沃州东北部青铜器铸造的数据结构中,来源在时间和地理上的分布不均匀。这就是基于青铜器及其合金元素组成数据重建当地有色金属冶金的原因。首次研究了基亚山谷(Shestakovo I墓地)塔加尔文化墓葬中的金属(A.I. Martynov, 1968年发掘)。研究了库尔干4号39具井口镐、铲和刀的元素组成。区分了“纯”铜、砷、锡和锡铅青铜的化学冶金类群。铜制品和砷青铜井口镐只来自1号墓穴。这可以用它后来的相对年代来解释。铜与锡的合金,固定在坟墓2、3和4的金属上,是塔加尔文化(公元前5 -4世纪)萨拉加申阶段的传统。1号墓的金属使我们有可能“捕捉”到一种用砷青铜和铜制造工具的趋势的出现,这是Lepeshkino阶段(公元前3 - 22世纪)和后来的Tesinsky墓群(公元前2世纪末-公元2世纪)的特征。因此,基亚河流域的这一段经历了与塔加尔部落的其他草原和森林草原地区相同的过程,即公元前3 -2世纪,锡合金青铜的比例减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tomsk State University Journal
Tomsk State University Journal MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信