Stepped care model of pain management and quality of pain care in long-term opioid therapy.

Q Medicine
B. Moore, Daren Anderson, Lindsey M. Dorflinger, I. Zlateva, Allison Lee, Wesley P. Gilliam, Terrence Tian, K. Khatri, C. Ruser, R. Kerns
{"title":"Stepped care model of pain management and quality of pain care in long-term opioid therapy.","authors":"B. Moore, Daren Anderson, Lindsey M. Dorflinger, I. Zlateva, Allison Lee, Wesley P. Gilliam, Terrence Tian, K. Khatri, C. Ruser, R. Kerns","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful organizational improvement processes depend on application of reliable metrics to establish targets and to monitor progress. This study examined the utility of the Pain Care Quality (PCQ) extraction tool in evaluating implementation of the Stepped Care Model for Pain Management at one Veterans Health Administration (VHA) healthcare system over 4 yr and in a non-VHA Federally qualified health center (FQHC) over 2 yr. Two hundred progress notes per year from VHA and 150 notes per year from FQHC primary care prescribers of long-term opioid therapy (>90 consecutive days) were randomly sampled. Each note was coded for the presence or absence of key dimensions of PCQ (i.e., pain assessment, treatment plans, pain reassessment/outcomes, patient education). General estimating equations controlling for provider and facility were used to examine changes in PCQ items over time. Improvements in the VHA were noted in pain reassessment and patient education, with trends in positive directions for all dimensions. Results suggest that the PCQ extraction tool is feasible and may be responsive to efforts to promote organizational improvements in pain care. Future research is indicated to improve the reliability of the PCQ extraction tool and enhance its usability.","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 1 1","pages":"137-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0254","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Successful organizational improvement processes depend on application of reliable metrics to establish targets and to monitor progress. This study examined the utility of the Pain Care Quality (PCQ) extraction tool in evaluating implementation of the Stepped Care Model for Pain Management at one Veterans Health Administration (VHA) healthcare system over 4 yr and in a non-VHA Federally qualified health center (FQHC) over 2 yr. Two hundred progress notes per year from VHA and 150 notes per year from FQHC primary care prescribers of long-term opioid therapy (>90 consecutive days) were randomly sampled. Each note was coded for the presence or absence of key dimensions of PCQ (i.e., pain assessment, treatment plans, pain reassessment/outcomes, patient education). General estimating equations controlling for provider and facility were used to examine changes in PCQ items over time. Improvements in the VHA were noted in pain reassessment and patient education, with trends in positive directions for all dimensions. Results suggest that the PCQ extraction tool is feasible and may be responsive to efforts to promote organizational improvements in pain care. Future research is indicated to improve the reliability of the PCQ extraction tool and enhance its usability.
长期阿片类药物治疗中疼痛管理和疼痛护理质量的阶梯护理模式。
成功的组织改进过程依赖于应用可靠的度量标准来建立目标和监控进展。本研究检查了疼痛护理质量(PCQ)提取工具在评估一个退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)医疗保健系统4年以上和一个非VHA联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC) 2年以上的疼痛管理阶梯护理模型实施中的作用。随机抽取VHA每年200份进度记录和FQHC每年150份长期阿片类药物治疗处方(连续90天)的记录。每个记录都对PCQ的关键维度(即疼痛评估、治疗计划、疼痛重新评估/结果、患者教育)的存在与否进行编码。使用控制供应商和设施的一般估计方程来检查PCQ项目随时间的变化。VHA在疼痛重新评估和患者教育方面均有改善,在所有方面都有积极的趋势。结果表明,PCQ提取工具是可行的,并且可能对促进疼痛护理组织改进的努力作出反应。今后的研究将进一步提高PCQ提取工具的可靠性和可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.64
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信