Reduced gait automaticity in female patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: Case-control study.

Q Medicine
Jan b Eyskens, J. Nijs, K. Wouters, G. Moorkens
{"title":"Reduced gait automaticity in female patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: Case-control study.","authors":"Jan b Eyskens, J. Nijs, K. Wouters, G. Moorkens","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) report difficulties walking for a prolonged period of time. This study compares gait automaticity between women with CFS and nondisabled controls. The \"stops walking with eyes closed with secondary cognitive task\" test is based on the classic \"stops walking while talking\" test but compares walking with eyes closed while performing a secondary cognitive task in a female CFS population (n = 34) and in female nondisabled controls (n = 38). When initiating gate, 23.5% of patients with CFS looked toward the ground compared with only 2.6% of nondisabled controls. After 7 m, subjects were asked to close their eyes, and after another 7 m, they were asked, \"How much is 100 minus 7?\" Of the patients with CFS, 55.9% stopped walking compared with 5.3% of nondisabled controls. Less automated walking was observed in patients with CFS than in nondisabled controls (p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability is moderate for global stopping. This simple test observed reduced gait automaticity in patients with CFS for the first time. Dual tasking could be helpful to address the functional limitations found in this particular study.","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"52 7 1","pages":"805-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0293","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) report difficulties walking for a prolonged period of time. This study compares gait automaticity between women with CFS and nondisabled controls. The "stops walking with eyes closed with secondary cognitive task" test is based on the classic "stops walking while talking" test but compares walking with eyes closed while performing a secondary cognitive task in a female CFS population (n = 34) and in female nondisabled controls (n = 38). When initiating gate, 23.5% of patients with CFS looked toward the ground compared with only 2.6% of nondisabled controls. After 7 m, subjects were asked to close their eyes, and after another 7 m, they were asked, "How much is 100 minus 7?" Of the patients with CFS, 55.9% stopped walking compared with 5.3% of nondisabled controls. Less automated walking was observed in patients with CFS than in nondisabled controls (p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability is moderate for global stopping. This simple test observed reduced gait automaticity in patients with CFS for the first time. Dual tasking could be helpful to address the functional limitations found in this particular study.
慢性疲劳综合征女性患者步态自动性降低:病例对照研究。
慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者报告长时间行走困难。这项研究比较了患有慢性疲劳综合症的女性和非残疾对照组的步态自动性。“闭眼停止行走和次要认知任务”测试是基于经典的“说话时停止行走”测试,但比较了女性慢性疲劳综合症人群(n = 34)和女性非残疾对照组(n = 38)在执行次要认知任务时闭眼行走的情况。当启动gate时,23.5%的CFS患者看向地面,而非残疾对照组只有2.6%。7米后,受试者被要求闭上眼睛,再过7米后,他们被问到:“100减7等于几?”在患有慢性疲劳综合症的患者中,55.9%的人停止行走,而非残疾对照组的这一比例为5.3%。与非残疾对照组相比,CFS患者的自动行走较少(p < 0.001)。对于全局停止,重测信度适中。这个简单的测试首次观察到慢性疲劳综合症患者的步态自动性降低。双重任务可能有助于解决本研究中发现的功能限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.64
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信