Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ophthalmology Emergency Clinic Intake Forms

Kaisra Esmail, Keean Nanji, Setareh Ziai
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ophthalmology Emergency Clinic Intake Forms","authors":"Kaisra Esmail, Keean Nanji, Setareh Ziai","doi":"10.18192/UOJM.V10I2.4851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel patient intake form in an emergency ophthalmology clinic at a Canadian academic center. Despite the popularity of intake forms, they have not been previously reported in the literature in an emergency ophthalmology clinic setting. \nMethods: All new patients at the University of Ottawa emergency ophthalmology clinic were provided with a patient intake form to complete while waiting to be seen. Ophthalmology residents and nurses at the University of Ottawa completed an effectiveness survey evaluating the benefits of these forms after 24 months of use. Emergency ophthalmology clinics at other Canadian academic institutions were questioned regarding their use of patient intake forms.  \nResults: Nine residents and two nurses completed the effectiveness survey. The mean (SD) score assessing the use of the form (1=never, 5=every patient encounter) was 3.90 (1.20). The greatest perceived benefit involved improved clinic efficiency (91%). All (100%) of responses indicated that the form should continue to be used in practice. Of the other 14 ophthalmology residency programs in Canada, nine currently do not use an intake form, two have forms completed by nurses and three utilize a form but are dissatisfied with their results. \nConclusions: Our results suggest that there are benefits with respect to clinic efficiency, accuracy of medical information, collaboration between healthcare professionals, and patient satisfaction when utilizing patient intake forms in an emergency ophthalmology setting. The use of similar forms may provide an opportunity to improve clinical practice at other academic institutions within Canada.","PeriodicalId":30662,"journal":{"name":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/UOJM.V10I2.4851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel patient intake form in an emergency ophthalmology clinic at a Canadian academic center. Despite the popularity of intake forms, they have not been previously reported in the literature in an emergency ophthalmology clinic setting. Methods: All new patients at the University of Ottawa emergency ophthalmology clinic were provided with a patient intake form to complete while waiting to be seen. Ophthalmology residents and nurses at the University of Ottawa completed an effectiveness survey evaluating the benefits of these forms after 24 months of use. Emergency ophthalmology clinics at other Canadian academic institutions were questioned regarding their use of patient intake forms.  Results: Nine residents and two nurses completed the effectiveness survey. The mean (SD) score assessing the use of the form (1=never, 5=every patient encounter) was 3.90 (1.20). The greatest perceived benefit involved improved clinic efficiency (91%). All (100%) of responses indicated that the form should continue to be used in practice. Of the other 14 ophthalmology residency programs in Canada, nine currently do not use an intake form, two have forms completed by nurses and three utilize a form but are dissatisfied with their results. Conclusions: Our results suggest that there are benefits with respect to clinic efficiency, accuracy of medical information, collaboration between healthcare professionals, and patient satisfaction when utilizing patient intake forms in an emergency ophthalmology setting. The use of similar forms may provide an opportunity to improve clinical practice at other academic institutions within Canada.
眼科急诊门诊收纳表的有效性评价
目的:评价加拿大某学术中心眼科急诊门诊采用新型病人入院表的有效性。尽管摄入形式的普及,他们没有以前的文献报道在急诊眼科诊所设置。方法:所有在渥太华大学眼科急诊诊所就诊的新患者在等待就诊时填写一份患者入院表。渥太华大学的眼科住院医师和护士在使用24个月后完成了一项有效性调查,评估了这些表格的益处。对加拿大其他学术机构的急诊眼科诊所使用病人入院表的情况进行了询问。结果:9名住院医师和2名护士完成了有效性调查。评估表格使用情况的平均(SD)评分(1=从未,5=每位患者就诊)为3.90分(1.20分)。最大的获益包括提高临床效率(91%)。所有(100%)的回复表明,该表格应继续在实践中使用。在加拿大的其他14个眼科住院医师项目中,目前有9个没有使用入学表格,2个由护士填写表格,3个使用表格,但对结果不满意。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在急诊眼科环境中使用患者入院表,在临床效率、医疗信息准确性、医疗保健专业人员之间的协作和患者满意度方面都有好处。使用类似的表格可以为加拿大其他学术机构提供改善临床实践的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书