M. Karlsson, Masaru Yarime
{"title":"Reflexivity in Development Assistance","authors":"M. Karlsson, Masaru Yarime","doi":"10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v10i01/55442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Common Ground, Martin Karlsson and Marasu Yarime, All Rights ReservedThe concept of reflexivity has been brought forward as a key component of sustainability science and sustainability governance, being indispensable for sustainability as a process and a goal. The reflexive governance research field has started to produce some insight into what reflexivity could mean in practice when brought out from the hallowed halls of science into the messy arena of governance, but so far attention has been focused on First-World cases. This paper will explore how reflexive governance relates to the reflexivity concept, and how it can be applied within Official Development Assistance (ODA), especially in ODA evaluations. Two main obstacles to reflexive knowledge production in ODA are identified, being the duality of accountability in ODA and the resulting knowledge incentives, and the asymmetry in communicative capacity. Lastly recommendations are made to address these obstacles, so that evaluations can assist in achieving sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":38204,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"17-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v10i01/55442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
发展援助的反身性
©Common Ground, Martin Karlsson和Marasu Yarime,版权所有反思性的概念已经被提出,作为可持续发展科学和可持续发展治理的关键组成部分,对于可持续发展作为一个过程和目标是不可或缺的。反思性治理研究领域已经开始对反思性在实践中意味着什么产生一些见解,当从神圣的科学殿堂带到混乱的治理舞台时,但到目前为止,注意力一直集中在第一世界的案例上。本文将探讨反身性治理与反身性概念的关系,以及如何将其应用于官方发展援助(ODA),特别是在ODA评估中。确定了官方发展援助中反思性知识生产的两个主要障碍,即官方发展援助中的问责制和由此产生的知识激励的双重性,以及沟通能力的不对称。最后,提出了解决这些障碍的建议,以便评价能够协助实现可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。