Igniting the statistical spark in the social sciences – abilites, student feedback and teacher observations

Rhys C. Jones
{"title":"Igniting the statistical spark in the social sciences – abilites, student feedback and teacher observations","authors":"Rhys C. Jones","doi":"10.17265/2159-5291/2018.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several investigations have concluded that there is a quantitative deficit within the social sciences in the UK (Fonow and Cook, 1991; Lincoln and Denzin, 2003; Payne et al., 2004; Williams, et al., 2008; MacInnes, 2009; Platt, 2012; Payne, 2014; Williams et al., 2015). Reasons for this are potentially rooted within the societal negative attitudes towards mathematics. \n \nSocietal negative attitudes towards mathematics could be a product of the traditional teaching approaches of mathematics education. In particular, teaching methods have potentially contributed to the subject identity as being right or wrong, perceived as a difficult discipline (Porkess, 2013; Donaldson, 2015). Significant changes have been made to mathematics education (years 7-13) more recently to encourage greater student uptake post-16, within England and Wales (Porkess, 2013; Donaldson, 2015). Statistics has gained an increasingly important voice within mathematics education. Statistics also cuts across many disciplines, becoming a core subject. In addition, employers are increasingly requesting employees acquire data analysis skills, underpinned by statistical and scientific principles. \n \nIn relation to the quantitative deficit, the Q-Step initiative was created across 15 British universities to develop a range of undergraduate social science degree courses to improve quantitative methods skills. The Q-Step centre within Cardiff University invested in the development of a range of school and further education activities, to highlight the importance of these quantitative skills. The development of a QCF level 3 course in Social Analytics (investigation of social processes using statistical analysis and techniques) involved the creation of the Pilot Scheme in Social Analytics (SA). This course was developed with a group of secondary school teachers and FE lecturers, delivered over a series of 21 weeks to a mixture of year 12 and 13 students in Cardiff in 2014/15 (44 students) and 2015/16 (29 students). \n \nTo investigate the effectiveness of the Pilot Scheme in SA, a series of research questions were developed. A quasi-experimental design was used to operationalise these research questions to measure the impacts on student attitudes and attainment in statistics (in year 12 and 13) on an experimental group who received a contextualised statistics course in 2015/16 (Pilot Scheme in SA), compared to two control groups. \n \nResults suggest the course did lead to changes in the students’ attitudes, becoming more positive. In addition, their statistical abilities also seem to have improved, in comparison to the two control groups. Although the positive impacts of the course are somewhat tentative, and in places it is difficult to make unequivocal inferences, there is no evidence to suggest the course had a negative impact on the experimental group. In comparison, students in both control groups who didn’t receive the treatment, showed negative differences in their attitudes and abilities with respect to mathematics and statistics. \n \nIn light of the findings and discussion, recommendations have been made with reference to professional practice and also future research. These include expanding the Pilot Scheme in SA to be made available for more schools in Wales and developing teacher training support to deliver these courses.","PeriodicalId":61124,"journal":{"name":"数学和系统科学:英文版","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"数学和系统科学:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5291/2018.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several investigations have concluded that there is a quantitative deficit within the social sciences in the UK (Fonow and Cook, 1991; Lincoln and Denzin, 2003; Payne et al., 2004; Williams, et al., 2008; MacInnes, 2009; Platt, 2012; Payne, 2014; Williams et al., 2015). Reasons for this are potentially rooted within the societal negative attitudes towards mathematics. Societal negative attitudes towards mathematics could be a product of the traditional teaching approaches of mathematics education. In particular, teaching methods have potentially contributed to the subject identity as being right or wrong, perceived as a difficult discipline (Porkess, 2013; Donaldson, 2015). Significant changes have been made to mathematics education (years 7-13) more recently to encourage greater student uptake post-16, within England and Wales (Porkess, 2013; Donaldson, 2015). Statistics has gained an increasingly important voice within mathematics education. Statistics also cuts across many disciplines, becoming a core subject. In addition, employers are increasingly requesting employees acquire data analysis skills, underpinned by statistical and scientific principles. In relation to the quantitative deficit, the Q-Step initiative was created across 15 British universities to develop a range of undergraduate social science degree courses to improve quantitative methods skills. The Q-Step centre within Cardiff University invested in the development of a range of school and further education activities, to highlight the importance of these quantitative skills. The development of a QCF level 3 course in Social Analytics (investigation of social processes using statistical analysis and techniques) involved the creation of the Pilot Scheme in Social Analytics (SA). This course was developed with a group of secondary school teachers and FE lecturers, delivered over a series of 21 weeks to a mixture of year 12 and 13 students in Cardiff in 2014/15 (44 students) and 2015/16 (29 students). To investigate the effectiveness of the Pilot Scheme in SA, a series of research questions were developed. A quasi-experimental design was used to operationalise these research questions to measure the impacts on student attitudes and attainment in statistics (in year 12 and 13) on an experimental group who received a contextualised statistics course in 2015/16 (Pilot Scheme in SA), compared to two control groups. Results suggest the course did lead to changes in the students’ attitudes, becoming more positive. In addition, their statistical abilities also seem to have improved, in comparison to the two control groups. Although the positive impacts of the course are somewhat tentative, and in places it is difficult to make unequivocal inferences, there is no evidence to suggest the course had a negative impact on the experimental group. In comparison, students in both control groups who didn’t receive the treatment, showed negative differences in their attitudes and abilities with respect to mathematics and statistics. In light of the findings and discussion, recommendations have been made with reference to professional practice and also future research. These include expanding the Pilot Scheme in SA to be made available for more schools in Wales and developing teacher training support to deliver these courses.
点燃社会科学的统计火花-能力,学生反馈和教师观察
几项调查得出结论,英国社会科学内部存在定量赤字(Fonow and Cook, 1991;Lincoln and Denzin, 2003;Payne等人,2004;Williams等人,2008;MacInnes, 2009;普拉特,2012;佩恩,2014;Williams et al., 2015)。造成这种情况的原因可能植根于社会对数学的消极态度。社会对数学的消极态度可能是传统数学教育教学方法的产物。特别是,教学方法可能会对学科的对与错产生影响,被认为是一门困难的学科(Porkess, 2013;唐纳森,2015)。最近,英格兰和威尔士的数学教育(7-13年级)发生了重大变化,以鼓励更多的16岁以后的学生接受数学教育(Porkess, 2013;唐纳森,2015)。统计学在数学教育中占有越来越重要的地位。统计学也涉及许多学科,成为一门核心学科。此外,雇主越来越多地要求员工掌握以统计和科学原理为基础的数据分析技能。针对定量不足,英国15所大学发起了Q-Step计划,旨在开发一系列社会科学本科学位课程,以提高定量方法技能。卡迪夫大学的Q-Step中心投资开发了一系列学校和继续教育活动,以突出这些定量技能的重要性。QCF第三级社会分析课程(使用统计分析和技术调查社会过程)的开发涉及社会分析(SA)试点计划的创建。该课程是由一组中学教师和FE讲师开发的,在2014/15年度(44名学生)和2015/16年度(29名学生)向卡迪夫12年级和13年级的学生提供了一系列21周的课程。为了调查南澳试点计划的有效性,我们提出了一系列研究问题。使用准实验设计来操作这些研究问题,以衡量实验组在2015/16学年(南澳试点计划)接受情境化统计学课程的学生对统计(12年级和13年级)的态度和成绩的影响,与两个对照组相比。结果表明,该课程确实改变了学生的态度,变得更加积极。此外,与两个对照组相比,他们的统计能力似乎也有所提高。虽然该课程的积极影响有些试测性,而且在某些地方很难做出明确的推断,但没有证据表明该课程对实验组有负面影响。相比之下,没有接受治疗的两组学生在数学和统计方面的态度和能力上表现出负向差异。根据调查结果和讨论,提出了参考专业实践和未来研究的建议。这些措施包括将南澳大利亚州的试点计划扩大到威尔士的更多学校,并为提供这些课程提供教师培训支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
450
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信