Supplementation of growing bulls grazing Panicum maximum cv. Coloniao increases average daily gain and does not impact subsequent performance in feedlot phase

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Térssio Roger Ramalho, D. F. Costa, S. C. Silva, R. C. Goulart, Guilhermo Francklin Souza Congio, F. Santos
{"title":"Supplementation of growing bulls grazing Panicum maximum cv. Coloniao increases average daily gain and does not impact subsequent performance in feedlot phase","authors":"Térssio Roger Ramalho, D. F. Costa, S. C. Silva, R. C. Goulart, Guilhermo Francklin Souza Congio, F. Santos","doi":"10.1590/s1519-99402121202020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To evaluate the influence of supplementation strategies on the average daily gain (ADG) of cattle in a rotational grazing system of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum cv. Coloniao) pastures during the rainy season. It was further evaluated the residual effects in the feedlot finishing phase. Seventy-five 8 month-old crossbred bull calves averaging 200.1 ± 2.5 kg of body weight (BW) were stratified and grouped in three into 25 blocks according to BW, and then randomly assigned to one of three supplementation treatments: control (no supplement), energy supplement [65 g crude protein (CP)/kg dry matter (DM)] or protein supplement (200 g CP/kg DM) both fed as 6 g/kg BW. All animals composed a single herd and were separated daily according to treatment groups for supplementation. After the grazing phase, all animals were moved to a feedlot and received the same diet up until slaughter. Guinea grass was subjected to rotational stocking with pre- and post-grazing heights of 76 and 43 cm, respectively. Energy and protein supplements provided similar ADG (P > 0.05; 0.94 kg/day) which was greater than for non-supplemented animals during the grazing phase (P ≤ 0.05; 0.74 kg/day), but there was no difference in the subsequent feedlot phase (P > 0.05; 1.45 kg/day). The protein supplement had no incremental effects over the energy supplement on ADG and carcass traits of growing crossbreed bulls during the grazing phase, indicating that either source could be used, and that an energy supplement would lead to more efficient nutrient use coming from the grass.","PeriodicalId":38522,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-99402121202020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT To evaluate the influence of supplementation strategies on the average daily gain (ADG) of cattle in a rotational grazing system of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum cv. Coloniao) pastures during the rainy season. It was further evaluated the residual effects in the feedlot finishing phase. Seventy-five 8 month-old crossbred bull calves averaging 200.1 ± 2.5 kg of body weight (BW) were stratified and grouped in three into 25 blocks according to BW, and then randomly assigned to one of three supplementation treatments: control (no supplement), energy supplement [65 g crude protein (CP)/kg dry matter (DM)] or protein supplement (200 g CP/kg DM) both fed as 6 g/kg BW. All animals composed a single herd and were separated daily according to treatment groups for supplementation. After the grazing phase, all animals were moved to a feedlot and received the same diet up until slaughter. Guinea grass was subjected to rotational stocking with pre- and post-grazing heights of 76 and 43 cm, respectively. Energy and protein supplements provided similar ADG (P > 0.05; 0.94 kg/day) which was greater than for non-supplemented animals during the grazing phase (P ≤ 0.05; 0.74 kg/day), but there was no difference in the subsequent feedlot phase (P > 0.05; 1.45 kg/day). The protein supplement had no incremental effects over the energy supplement on ADG and carcass traits of growing crossbreed bulls during the grazing phase, indicating that either source could be used, and that an energy supplement would lead to more efficient nutrient use coming from the grass.
生长公牛放牧大头草的补充。殖民地可提高饲期平均日增重,对后期生产性能无影响
摘要为了评价不同饲粮添加策略对轮牧系统下豚草(Panicum maximum cv.)牛平均日增重(ADG)的影响。在雨季放牧。进一步评价了在饲养场育肥阶段的残留效应。选取75头平均体重(200.1±2.5 kg) kg的8月龄杂交公牛犊牛,按体重分成3组,随机分为25组,分别饲喂对照组(不添加)、能量补充组[65 g粗蛋白质(CP)/kg干物质(DM)]和蛋白质补充组(200 g CP/kg DM),每组6 g/kg BW。所有动物组成一个畜群,每天根据处理组分开进行补充。放牧阶段结束后,所有动物被转移到饲养场,并在屠宰前接受相同的饮食。放牧前后轮换放养,放养高度分别为76 cm和43 cm。能量和蛋白质添加组的平均日增重相近(P < 0.05;0.94 kg/d),高于放牧期未添加组(P≤0.05;0.74 kg/d),但在随后的饲养场阶段无显著差异(P < 0.05;1.45公斤/天)。在放牧阶段,蛋白质补充对生长中的杂交公牛的平均日增重和胴体性状的影响没有增加,表明任何一种来源都可以使用,并且能量补充可以更有效地利用来自草的营养物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal
Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信