Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Barbara Haline Buss Baiak, J. M. Gasparina, J. L. Moletta, R. A. Rocha
{"title":"Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems","authors":"Barbara Haline Buss Baiak, J. M. Gasparina, J. L. Moletta, R. A. Rocha","doi":"10.1590/s1519-99402121152020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to evaluate the resistance of Purunã heifers to nematode infection in two different production systems. In this study, 29 heifers were divided into eight pickets, four in an integrated livestock forest system (ILF) and four in a conventional pasture system (CPS). Feces were collected monthly to perform the fecal egg count (FEC), evaluate the degree of infection caused by gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle, and carry out coproculture, to identify the genus of the parasites. In addition, animal body weight was determined to evaluate performance. On the same day as the measurements, forage samples were collected to determine the number of infective larvae per kilogram of dry matter (L3/kg DM) in each picket. There were no statistical differences in FECs between the treatments. Although no significant differences were observed in the recovery of L3/kg DM, the contamination was higher in the ILF compared to CPS in December (344 and 37.7 L3/kg DM, respectively) and January (312 and 0 L3/kg DM, respectively). In March, the CPS (321 L3/kg DM) presented higher contamination than the ILF (80.7 L3/kg DM), but with no statistical difference. The weight of the animals was higher for the CPS compared to the ILF treatment throughout the whole experimental period, with a significant difference in December (343.30 kg and 314.08 kg, respectively). The present study demonstrated numerically that greater numbers of L3 were recovered from pasture of the ILF, which could have resulted in higher contamination and lower performance of the animals.","PeriodicalId":38522,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-99402121152020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to evaluate the resistance of Purunã heifers to nematode infection in two different production systems. In this study, 29 heifers were divided into eight pickets, four in an integrated livestock forest system (ILF) and four in a conventional pasture system (CPS). Feces were collected monthly to perform the fecal egg count (FEC), evaluate the degree of infection caused by gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle, and carry out coproculture, to identify the genus of the parasites. In addition, animal body weight was determined to evaluate performance. On the same day as the measurements, forage samples were collected to determine the number of infective larvae per kilogram of dry matter (L3/kg DM) in each picket. There were no statistical differences in FECs between the treatments. Although no significant differences were observed in the recovery of L3/kg DM, the contamination was higher in the ILF compared to CPS in December (344 and 37.7 L3/kg DM, respectively) and January (312 and 0 L3/kg DM, respectively). In March, the CPS (321 L3/kg DM) presented higher contamination than the ILF (80.7 L3/kg DM), but with no statistical difference. The weight of the animals was higher for the CPS compared to the ILF treatment throughout the whole experimental period, with a significant difference in December (343.30 kg and 314.08 kg, respectively). The present study demonstrated numerically that greater numbers of L3 were recovered from pasture of the ILF, which could have resulted in higher contamination and lower performance of the animals.
在传统和综合畜牧业森林系统中饲养的Purunã小母牛的胃肠道线虫感染
摘要本研究的目的是评估两种不同生产系统中Purunã小母牛对线虫感染的抗性。在这项研究中,29头小母牛被分为8个纠柴场,其中4个在综合畜牧业森林系统(ILF)中,4个在传统牧场系统(CPS)中。每月收集粪便进行粪卵计数(FEC),评估牛胃肠道线虫感染程度,并进行共育,鉴定寄生虫属。此外,测定动物体重以评价生产性能。测量当天采集饲料样品,测定每千克干物质中感染幼虫数(L3/kg DM)。两组间FECs无统计学差异。虽然在L3/kg DM的回收率上没有观察到显著差异,但在12月(分别为344和37.7 L3/kg DM)和1月(分别为312和0 L3/kg DM), ILF中的污染高于CPS。3月份,CPS (321 L3/kg DM)的污染程度高于ILF (80.7 L3/kg DM),但差异无统计学意义。在整个实验期间,CPS处理的动物体重均高于ILF处理,在12月份差异显著(分别为343.30 kg和314.08 kg)。本研究在数值上表明,从ILF的牧场中回收了更多的L3,这可能导致更高的污染和动物的生产性能降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal
Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信