Bell v. Cheswick: The Era of Court-Regulated Power Plants

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
I. Pfister
{"title":"Bell v. Cheswick: The Era of Court-Regulated Power Plants","authors":"I. Pfister","doi":"10.15779/Z38Q29R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bell v. Cheswick was a 2012 class action suit brought against GenOn Power Midwest, L.P. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Property owners in Springdale, Pennsylvania alleged that GenOn’s local generating station’s emissions caused tortious pollution that affected their homes and property. The district court found for the defendant. The case was appealed to the Third Circuit, which reversed and held for the plaintiffs. Specifically, it ruled that the Clean Air Act does not preempt state law tort claims brought by private property owners against a source of pollution located within the state. This Note compares and contrasts the cases that laid the foundation for the Third Circuit’s holding. Previous similar claims have failed and succeeded in ways that created a template to avoid preemption and bring a successful nuisance action. The Springdale residents’ tort claims against the local generating station successfully followed that template and creates a guide for future plaintiffs. This Note outlines that guide, and argues state common law tort claims are an essential means of controlling local pollution that the statutory framework of the Environmental Protection Agency often fails to address.","PeriodicalId":45532,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Law Quarterly","volume":"42 1","pages":"437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Q29R","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bell v. Cheswick was a 2012 class action suit brought against GenOn Power Midwest, L.P. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Property owners in Springdale, Pennsylvania alleged that GenOn’s local generating station’s emissions caused tortious pollution that affected their homes and property. The district court found for the defendant. The case was appealed to the Third Circuit, which reversed and held for the plaintiffs. Specifically, it ruled that the Clean Air Act does not preempt state law tort claims brought by private property owners against a source of pollution located within the state. This Note compares and contrasts the cases that laid the foundation for the Third Circuit’s holding. Previous similar claims have failed and succeeded in ways that created a template to avoid preemption and bring a successful nuisance action. The Springdale residents’ tort claims against the local generating station successfully followed that template and creates a guide for future plaintiffs. This Note outlines that guide, and argues state common law tort claims are an essential means of controlling local pollution that the statutory framework of the Environmental Protection Agency often fails to address.
贝尔诉切斯威克:法院监管发电厂的时代
贝尔诉切斯维克案是2012年美国宾夕法尼亚州西区地方法院对GenOn Power Midwest, L.P.提起的集体诉讼。宾夕法尼亚州斯普林代尔的业主声称,GenOn当地发电厂的排放造成了侵权污染,影响了他们的房屋和财产。地区法院作出有利于被告的判决。该案件被上诉到第三巡回法院,该巡回法院推翻了原告方的判决。具体来说,法院裁定《清洁空气法》不优先于由私人财产所有者针对州内污染源提起的州法侵权索赔。本说明对为第三巡回法院的判决奠定基础的案件进行了比较和对比。以前类似的索赔失败或成功的方式创造了一个模板,以避免先发制人,并带来成功的滋扰诉讼。斯普林代尔居民对当地发电站的侵权索赔成功地遵循了这一模板,并为未来的原告提供了指导。本说明概述了这一指导方针,并认为州普通法侵权索赔是控制地方污染的基本手段,而环境保护局的法定框架往往无法解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecology Law Quarterly"s primary function is to produce two high quality journals: a quarterly print version and a more frequent, cutting-edge online journal, Ecology Law Currents. UC Berkeley School of Law students manage every aspect of ELQ, from communicating with authors to editing articles to publishing the journals. In addition to featuring work by leading environmental law scholars, ELQ encourages student writing and publishes student pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信