ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES: ANTECEDENTS OF WELL-BEING AT WORK FOR RURAL SUCCESSORS

Q3 Social Sciences
Patrick Zawadzki, S. Teston, S. Lizote, I. M. Oro
{"title":"ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES: ANTECEDENTS OF WELL-BEING AT WORK FOR RURAL SUCCESSORS","authors":"Patrick Zawadzki, S. Teston, S. Lizote, I. M. Oro","doi":"10.1590/1678-6971/eramg220118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: This study sought to explore the relationship between well-being at work and organizational values in rural properties’ successors in a cooperative system. Originality/value: Empirically, the study presents elements for the strategic management of rural properties, especially for the challenge of preparing successors. For cooperatives, it contributes towards presenting elements for members’ management policies and practices. The study also extends the field of studies on well-being at work and the relationship between well-being and values in the organizational environment. Design/methodology/approach: The method design adopted followed a quantitative approach, with a relational scope, survey type, and cross-sectional. Successors representing 119 rural properties in western Santa Catarina participated in the study. Questionnaires assess organizational values and well-being at work as constructs. The descriptive, correlational statistics and structural equations modeling with partial least squares estimation confirm the hypothesis. Findings: The study’s main conclusion suggests that the values of environment dominance and autonomy are associated with commitment, satisfaction, and involvement with work for successors of rural properties in a cooperative system.","PeriodicalId":37120,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramg220118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study sought to explore the relationship between well-being at work and organizational values in rural properties’ successors in a cooperative system. Originality/value: Empirically, the study presents elements for the strategic management of rural properties, especially for the challenge of preparing successors. For cooperatives, it contributes towards presenting elements for members’ management policies and practices. The study also extends the field of studies on well-being at work and the relationship between well-being and values in the organizational environment. Design/methodology/approach: The method design adopted followed a quantitative approach, with a relational scope, survey type, and cross-sectional. Successors representing 119 rural properties in western Santa Catarina participated in the study. Questionnaires assess organizational values and well-being at work as constructs. The descriptive, correlational statistics and structural equations modeling with partial least squares estimation confirm the hypothesis. Findings: The study’s main conclusion suggests that the values of environment dominance and autonomy are associated with commitment, satisfaction, and involvement with work for successors of rural properties in a cooperative system.
组织价值观:农村继承者工作幸福感的前因
摘要目的:本研究旨在探讨合作制下农村财产继承人的工作幸福感与组织价值观之间的关系。原创性/价值:从经验上看,本研究提出了农村物业战略管理的要素,特别是准备接班人的挑战。对合作社来说,它有助于提出成员管理政策和做法的要素。本研究也扩展了工作幸福感以及组织环境中幸福感与价值观之间关系的研究领域。设计/方法论/方法:采用的方法设计遵循定量方法,具有关系范围,调查类型和横截面。圣卡塔琳娜州西部119处乡村房产的继承人参与了这项研究。问卷将组织价值观和工作幸福感作为构念进行评估。描述性统计、相关统计和偏最小二乘估计的结构方程模型证实了这一假设。研究结果:本研究的主要结论表明,环境主导和自主性的价值观与合作制度下农村财产继承者的承诺、满意度和参与工作有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信