Degendering organizations? The emergence of postfeminist networks

Q3 Social Sciences
P. J. C. Coelho Júnior, E. Holz, Raquel C. Sajonc, A. S. Hein
{"title":"Degendering organizations? The emergence of postfeminist networks","authors":"P. J. C. Coelho Júnior, E. Holz, Raquel C. Sajonc, A. S. Hein","doi":"10.1590/1678-6971/eramg220022.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose This article aims to present an initial analysis of a new form of collective action related to gender issues emerging in the Brazilian corporate world. It is based on an empirical investigation through two networks of women executives that aim to encourage gender equity in organizations. The analysis was structured based on the following research question: What is the potential of these networks related to gender equity led by executive women to degender organizations? The findings help to understand the complexity of this phenomenon, with its ambiguities and contradictions. Originality/value The originality of the article resides in the proposition of the concept of postfeminist networks to understand this new form of collective action for gender equity in the corporate environment. This concept helps researchers in Organizations Studies better understand moderate corporate feminism, reflecting and deflecting feminism. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative research of exploratory nature, whose investigation strategy was a multiple case study. Data collection occurred in two stages: documentary, and interviews. The interviews were with ten executives who lead and act directly in the management of two networks, both located in São Paulo, and aimed at increasing the representation of women in leadership positions in business. Findings The results show crucial limitations of these networks. They are related to a claimed distance from feminism and even a disdain for the feminist movement. They also do not consider the intersections between gender and other social markers of difference, such as race, class, and sexuality. Despite these limitations, this experience cannot be neglected. They represent a significant advance in individual strategies that women undertake to occupy spaces in the corporate world and those concerning affinity groups created by executive women within each company. These advances are even more critical in a business environment. There are typically very few women in upper management positions, and where male leaders have done very little in encouraging their presence in upper management.","PeriodicalId":37120,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramg220022.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This article aims to present an initial analysis of a new form of collective action related to gender issues emerging in the Brazilian corporate world. It is based on an empirical investigation through two networks of women executives that aim to encourage gender equity in organizations. The analysis was structured based on the following research question: What is the potential of these networks related to gender equity led by executive women to degender organizations? The findings help to understand the complexity of this phenomenon, with its ambiguities and contradictions. Originality/value The originality of the article resides in the proposition of the concept of postfeminist networks to understand this new form of collective action for gender equity in the corporate environment. This concept helps researchers in Organizations Studies better understand moderate corporate feminism, reflecting and deflecting feminism. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative research of exploratory nature, whose investigation strategy was a multiple case study. Data collection occurred in two stages: documentary, and interviews. The interviews were with ten executives who lead and act directly in the management of two networks, both located in São Paulo, and aimed at increasing the representation of women in leadership positions in business. Findings The results show crucial limitations of these networks. They are related to a claimed distance from feminism and even a disdain for the feminist movement. They also do not consider the intersections between gender and other social markers of difference, such as race, class, and sexuality. Despite these limitations, this experience cannot be neglected. They represent a significant advance in individual strategies that women undertake to occupy spaces in the corporate world and those concerning affinity groups created by executive women within each company. These advances are even more critical in a business environment. There are typically very few women in upper management positions, and where male leaders have done very little in encouraging their presence in upper management.
Degendering组织?后女权主义网络的出现
摘要目的本文旨在对巴西企业界出现的与性别问题有关的一种新形式的集体行动进行初步分析。它是基于通过两个旨在鼓励组织内性别平等的女性高管网络进行的实证调查。分析的结构是基于以下研究问题:这些由行政妇女领导的与性别平等有关的网络对去性别化组织的潜力是什么?这些发现有助于理解这一现象的复杂性,以及它的模糊性和矛盾性。本文的独创性在于提出了后女权主义网络的概念,以理解这种在企业环境中为性别平等而采取的集体行动的新形式。这一概念有助于组织研究研究者更好地理解适度的企业女权主义,反映和偏转女权主义。设计/方法/方法探索性质的研究,其调查策略是多案例研究。数据收集分为两个阶段:文献和访谈。访谈对象是10位高管,他们领导和直接参与管理两个网络,这两个网络都位于圣保罗,目的是增加女性在商业领导职位上的代表性。结果显示了这些网络的关键局限性。他们声称与女权主义保持距离,甚至蔑视女权主义运动。他们也没有考虑到性别和其他社会差异标志之间的交集,比如种族、阶级和性。尽管有这些限制,但这一经验不容忽视。它们代表了妇女在企业界占据空间的个人战略方面取得的重大进展,以及在每个公司内由妇女高管创建的亲密团体方面取得的重大进展。这些进步在商业环境中更为重要。通常很少有女性担任高层管理职位,而男性领导者在鼓励女性进入高层管理方面做得很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信