Profitability and conservative leverage of Brazilian companies

Q3 Social Sciences
Camila Adam, Gleice C. L. Moreno, Matheus Andriani, Tarcísio Pedro da Silva
{"title":"Profitability and conservative leverage of Brazilian companies","authors":"Camila Adam, Gleice C. L. Moreno, Matheus Andriani, Tarcísio Pedro da Silva","doi":"10.1590/1678-6971/eramf230278.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: The study aims to analyze the relationship between profitability and conservative leverage of Brazilian companies. Originality/value: The study contributes to the literature by investigating profitability as a fundamental determinant of the conservative leverage of Brazilian companies, making it possible to understand whether this influence is based on a perspective of flexibility or financial constraint. Design/methodology/approach: The research is characterized as descriptive, archival, and quantitative. The study sample consisted of 271 public companies and 8,823 private companies. Data were collected in the Refinitiv Eikon database between 2012 and 2019 (eight years). For data analysis, the study used logistic regression in Stata software. Findings: The results indicate that, on average, 5.05% of public companies have zero leverage, and 29.08% of private companies have book leverage below 5%; in the context of public companies, the more profitable the company, the greater the probability of having almost zero leverage, corroborating the perspective of financial flexibility. Less profitable private companies are likelier to have zero leverage, which is consistent with the view of financial constraint.","PeriodicalId":37120,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramf230278.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The study aims to analyze the relationship between profitability and conservative leverage of Brazilian companies. Originality/value: The study contributes to the literature by investigating profitability as a fundamental determinant of the conservative leverage of Brazilian companies, making it possible to understand whether this influence is based on a perspective of flexibility or financial constraint. Design/methodology/approach: The research is characterized as descriptive, archival, and quantitative. The study sample consisted of 271 public companies and 8,823 private companies. Data were collected in the Refinitiv Eikon database between 2012 and 2019 (eight years). For data analysis, the study used logistic regression in Stata software. Findings: The results indicate that, on average, 5.05% of public companies have zero leverage, and 29.08% of private companies have book leverage below 5%; in the context of public companies, the more profitable the company, the greater the probability of having almost zero leverage, corroborating the perspective of financial flexibility. Less profitable private companies are likelier to have zero leverage, which is consistent with the view of financial constraint.
巴西公司的盈利能力和保守杠杆率
摘要目的:本研究旨在分析巴西公司盈利能力与保守杠杆之间的关系。独创性/价值:本研究通过调查盈利能力作为巴西公司保守杠杆的基本决定因素,从而对文献作出贡献,从而有可能了解这种影响是基于灵活性还是财务约束的角度。设计/方法/方法:该研究具有描述性、档案性和定量的特点。研究样本包括271家上市公司和8823家私营公司。数据收集于2012年至2019年(8年)的Refinitiv Eikon数据库中。数据分析采用Stata软件进行logistic回归。研究发现:平均而言,5.05%的上市公司账面杠杆为零,29.08%的非上市公司账面杠杆低于5%;在上市公司的背景下,盈利能力越强的公司,几乎为零杠杆的可能性越大,印证了财务灵活性的观点。盈利能力较差的私营企业更有可能是零杠杆,这与金融约束的观点是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信