Beyond Naïve Leftist Philosophy in Education – On Žižek’s Lacanian Politics and Pedagogy

J. Irwin
{"title":"Beyond Naïve Leftist Philosophy in Education – On Žižek’s Lacanian Politics and Pedagogy","authors":"J. Irwin","doi":"10.18573/J.2016.10087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If Slavoj Ž i ž ek belongs to a rather later generation of thinkers influenced by French philosophy, his allegiance to a Lacanian conceptual framework both aligns him and distinguishes him from the lineage of Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze etc. In this sense, the significance of Lacan’s thought for education is still to be properly considered and its contemporary articulation in the work of Ž i ž ek seems a good place to register this understanding and analysis. What marks out Ž i ž ek ’s work and the relation to the Former Yugoslavia is the way in which the internal dialogue of Marxism evolves in a very particular way in the latter context, with an allegiance emerging between Marx, Lacan and a radical form of psychoanalysis. In this essay, I foreground how Ž i ž ek ’s work polemically takes us away from a (utopian and all-too-easy) resolution to the contradictions of contemporary society, politics and education. Rather, in society as in the educational sphere, a Ž i ž ek ian and (Lacanian) psychoanalytical critique of ideology is one where a certain ‘deadlock’ must be borne, both at the level of subject and at the societal level. This emphasis on the recalcitrance of ideology and a certain irreducibility of alienation, both societal and pedagogical, would be at least one of the lessons we might take from Ž i ž ek ’s recent work and the wider discourse of the Ljubljana School of Psychoanalysis.","PeriodicalId":87289,"journal":{"name":"JOMEC journal : journalism, media and cultural studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOMEC journal : journalism, media and cultural studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18573/J.2016.10087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If Slavoj Ž i ž ek belongs to a rather later generation of thinkers influenced by French philosophy, his allegiance to a Lacanian conceptual framework both aligns him and distinguishes him from the lineage of Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze etc. In this sense, the significance of Lacan’s thought for education is still to be properly considered and its contemporary articulation in the work of Ž i ž ek seems a good place to register this understanding and analysis. What marks out Ž i ž ek ’s work and the relation to the Former Yugoslavia is the way in which the internal dialogue of Marxism evolves in a very particular way in the latter context, with an allegiance emerging between Marx, Lacan and a radical form of psychoanalysis. In this essay, I foreground how Ž i ž ek ’s work polemically takes us away from a (utopian and all-too-easy) resolution to the contradictions of contemporary society, politics and education. Rather, in society as in the educational sphere, a Ž i ž ek ian and (Lacanian) psychoanalytical critique of ideology is one where a certain ‘deadlock’ must be borne, both at the level of subject and at the societal level. This emphasis on the recalcitrance of ideology and a certain irreducibility of alienation, both societal and pedagogical, would be at least one of the lessons we might take from Ž i ž ek ’s recent work and the wider discourse of the Ljubljana School of Psychoanalysis.
超越Naïve左派教育哲学——论Žižek的拉康政治与教育学
如果说斯拉沃依Ž伊波耶克属于受法国哲学影响的较晚一代的思想家,那么他对拉康概念框架的忠诚,既使他与德里达、福柯、德勒兹等人的血统保持一致,又使他与众不同。在这个意义上,拉康的教育思想的意义仍然需要适当地考虑,它在Ž的工作中的当代表达似乎是记录这种理解和分析的好地方。在Ž伊波耶克的著作和与前南斯拉夫的关系中,马克思主义的内部对话在后一种语境中以一种非常特殊的方式发展,马克思、拉康和一种激进形式的精神分析之间出现了一种忠诚。在这篇文章中,我突出了Ž伊兹耶克的作品如何带我们远离(乌托邦式的,太容易的)解决当代社会,政治和教育矛盾的方法。更确切地说,在社会中如同在教育领域一样,对于意识形态的Ž伊波茨克式和(拉康式)精神分析式的批判,必须在主体和社会层面上承受某种“僵局”。这种对意识形态的抗拒和社会和教学上异化的某种不可约性的强调,至少是我们可以从Ž伊波耶克最近的作品和卢布尔雅那精神分析学派更广泛的论述中吸取的教训之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信