’Freud is finished, Einstein’s next’: Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis , Chaos Theory, and Quantum Entanglement

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Crystal Alberts
{"title":"’Freud is finished, Einstein’s next’: Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis , Chaos Theory, and Quantum Entanglement","authors":"Crystal Alberts","doi":"10.16995/ORBIT.196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that, in Cosmopolis, DeLillo returns to mathematical topics and formal structures, like those presented in Ratner's Star, and expands them to reflect more recent developments in science and technology to contemplate time—the subject that permeates many of his twenty first century novels—and to highlight, variously, the unpredictable, uncertain, interconnected, and illusory nature of the contemporary world. Written in between the dot-com bubble burst and the aftermath of September 11, 2001, this essay asserts that Cosmopolis is liminal: it offers a glimpse of the ruins of the future, and as one of its rejected titles suggests, it approaches an omega point. Drawing heavily on archival research in the Don DeLillo Papers at University of Texas, Austin's Harry Ransom Center, this essay contends that Cosmopolis is a thought experiment, of sorts, in which DeLillo incorporates his substantial and ongoing research on strange attractors, quantum entanglement, and the physics of time to consider the \"[t]wo forces in this world, past and future.\" In doing so, this essay suggests that DeLillo calls for a reassessment of the time in which this text is set and proposes an alternate way of perceiving the post-9/11 world.","PeriodicalId":37450,"journal":{"name":"Orbit (Cambridge)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbit (Cambridge)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/ORBIT.196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This essay argues that, in Cosmopolis, DeLillo returns to mathematical topics and formal structures, like those presented in Ratner's Star, and expands them to reflect more recent developments in science and technology to contemplate time—the subject that permeates many of his twenty first century novels—and to highlight, variously, the unpredictable, uncertain, interconnected, and illusory nature of the contemporary world. Written in between the dot-com bubble burst and the aftermath of September 11, 2001, this essay asserts that Cosmopolis is liminal: it offers a glimpse of the ruins of the future, and as one of its rejected titles suggests, it approaches an omega point. Drawing heavily on archival research in the Don DeLillo Papers at University of Texas, Austin's Harry Ransom Center, this essay contends that Cosmopolis is a thought experiment, of sorts, in which DeLillo incorporates his substantial and ongoing research on strange attractors, quantum entanglement, and the physics of time to consider the "[t]wo forces in this world, past and future." In doing so, this essay suggests that DeLillo calls for a reassessment of the time in which this text is set and proposes an alternate way of perceiving the post-9/11 world.
“弗洛伊德结束了,爱因斯坦的下一个”:唐·德里罗的《世界》、《混沌理论》和《量子纠缠》
本文认为,在《世界》中,德里罗回到了数学主题和形式结构,就像《拉特纳之星》中呈现的那样,并将它们扩展到反映科学和技术的最新发展,以思考时间——这一主题渗透到他的许多21世纪小说中——并以各种方式强调当代世界的不可预测、不确定、相互联系和虚幻的本质。这篇文章写于互联网泡沫破裂和2001年9月11日的余波之间,它断言《大都会》是有限的:它提供了对未来废墟的一瞥,正如它被拒绝的标题之一所暗示的那样,它接近了一个欧米茄点。这篇文章大量引用了德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校哈里·兰森中心的唐·德里罗论文中的档案研究,认为《大都会》是一种思想实验,在这种实验中,德里罗结合了他对奇怪吸引子、量子纠缠和时间物理学的大量和正在进行的研究,以考虑“这个世界上的两种力量,过去和未来”。在这样做的过程中,这篇文章表明,德里罗呼吁重新评估这篇文章所处的时代,并提出了一种感知后9/11世界的替代方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orbit (Cambridge)
Orbit (Cambridge) Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Orbit: Writing Around Pynchon is a journal that publishes high quality, rigorously reviewed and innovative scholarly material on the works of Thomas Pynchon, related authors and adjacent fields in 20th- and 21st-century literature. We publish special and general issues in a rolling format, which brings together a traditional journal article style with the latest publishing technology to ensure faster, yet prestigious, publication for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信