'Make the Circle Bigger': Alternate Discourses of Identity Construction in Black Theologies

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Johnathan Jodamus
{"title":"'Make the Circle Bigger': Alternate Discourses of Identity Construction in Black Theologies","authors":"Johnathan Jodamus","doi":"10.17159/2413-3027/2017/V30N2A9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role and place of South African Black theology in post-apartheid South Africa has been questioned since the advent of democracy in 1994. Recognising that South African Black theology was essentially ‘protest theology’ against an unjust White government, its utility in a post-apartheid context with a Black government in place, has been questioned. Predominant within this questioning is the political usefulness of Black Theology. What has remained largely un-examined in the literature is a focus on the prefix ‘Black’ in ‘black theology’. It is this that forms the focus of this article. Scrutiny of the prefix ‘black’ requires a scrutiny of the complexity of racial identity in South Africa. Notwithstanding the ways in which scholars reach for the ‘inclusive Biko notion of Black’ as a means to almost ‘get on’ with the political task of black theology, as opposed to debating identity, in this article I argue that critical race and identity theory are central to discussions on resurrecting Black Theologies. I offer a disclaimer that I will not be focusing so much on the matter of theology in this paper, but my focus will be on how identity is racially constructed and I offer suggestions as to how we may begin to think more critically regarding this category within a subject such as black theology. I bring my experiences of being ‘Coloured’ in South Africa into dialogue with critical identity theorists and argue that we need to ‘make the circle bigger,’ to include diverse perspectives on identity and that while Spivak’s notion of 1 Mofokeng (May 1988: 34 42); Molthabi November 1994: 113 141); Maluleke (November 1996: 3 19); Tutu 1986: 256 64); Maimela (1991: 141 59); Mosala (1986); Mosala (1989).","PeriodicalId":42808,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Religion","volume":"1 1","pages":"207-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3027/2017/V30N2A9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The role and place of South African Black theology in post-apartheid South Africa has been questioned since the advent of democracy in 1994. Recognising that South African Black theology was essentially ‘protest theology’ against an unjust White government, its utility in a post-apartheid context with a Black government in place, has been questioned. Predominant within this questioning is the political usefulness of Black Theology. What has remained largely un-examined in the literature is a focus on the prefix ‘Black’ in ‘black theology’. It is this that forms the focus of this article. Scrutiny of the prefix ‘black’ requires a scrutiny of the complexity of racial identity in South Africa. Notwithstanding the ways in which scholars reach for the ‘inclusive Biko notion of Black’ as a means to almost ‘get on’ with the political task of black theology, as opposed to debating identity, in this article I argue that critical race and identity theory are central to discussions on resurrecting Black Theologies. I offer a disclaimer that I will not be focusing so much on the matter of theology in this paper, but my focus will be on how identity is racially constructed and I offer suggestions as to how we may begin to think more critically regarding this category within a subject such as black theology. I bring my experiences of being ‘Coloured’ in South Africa into dialogue with critical identity theorists and argue that we need to ‘make the circle bigger,’ to include diverse perspectives on identity and that while Spivak’s notion of 1 Mofokeng (May 1988: 34 42); Molthabi November 1994: 113 141); Maluleke (November 1996: 3 19); Tutu 1986: 256 64); Maimela (1991: 141 59); Mosala (1986); Mosala (1989).
“使圈子更大”:黑人神学中身份建构的替代话语
南非黑人神学在后种族隔离时代的南非所扮演的角色和所处的地位,自1994年实行民主制度以来一直受到质疑。认识到南非黑人神学本质上是反对不公正的白人政府的“抗议神学”,它在黑人政府掌权的后种族隔离背景下的效用受到了质疑。在这个问题中占主导地位的是黑人神学的政治效用。在文学中大部分未被研究的是对“黑人神学”中的前缀“黑人”的关注。正是这一点构成了本文的重点。仔细研究“黑人”这个前缀,就需要仔细研究南非种族身份的复杂性。尽管学者们将“黑人的包容性Biko概念”作为一种几乎“继续”黑人神学政治任务的手段,而不是辩论身份,但在这篇文章中,我认为批判性种族和身份理论是讨论复兴黑人神学的核心。我要声明,我不会在这篇论文中过多地关注神学问题,但我的重点是种族身份是如何构建的,我提出了一些建议,关于我们如何开始更批判性地思考这个类别,在一个主题中,比如黑人神学。我把我在南非“有色人种”的经历与批判性身份理论家进行了对话,并认为我们需要“扩大圈子”,包括对身份的不同观点,而斯皮瓦克的1 Mofokeng概念(1988年5月:34 42);莫尔塔比1994年11月:113 141);马鲁莱克(1996年11月:319);图图1986:256 64);Maimela (1991: 141 59);Mosala (1986);Mosala(1989)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信