Social Responsibility Scale (SRS-2): Validity Evidence Based on Internal Structure

Q4 Psychology

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0102.3772e39nspe11.en

Lisandra Borges, F. Otoni, Thatiana H. de Lima, Patrícia Waltz Schelini

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to provide evidence of validity for the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) based on its internal structure. The results of 1,001 participants, aged between two and 73 years, indicated through Path Analysis that Social Perception predicts 56%, while Social Cognition predicts 79% of social responsiveness, Social Communication 92%, Social Motivation 70%, finally The Social Communication and Social Interaction subscale can predict 96% of social responsiveness. The subscales have a strong correlation magnitude and evidence the contribution of the SRS-2 to assess social responsiveness, in addition to being promising to predict the diagnosis of ASD at the national level.

查看原文本刊更多论文

社会责任量表(SRS-2):基于内部结构的效度证据

摘要本研究旨在从社会反应性量表(SRS-2)的内部结构出发，为其提供效度证据。通过路径分析，1001名年龄在2 ~ 73岁的被试的结果表明，社会知觉对社会反应的预测率为56%，社会认知对社会反应的预测率为79%，社会交际对社会反应的预测率为92%，社会动机对社会反应的预测率为70%，最后社会交际和社会互动子量表对社会反应的预测率为96%。这些量表具有很强的相关性，并证明了SRS-2在评估社会反应性方面的贡献，此外还有望在国家层面上预测ASD的诊断。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa is a journal published every three months by Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de Brasília [Institute of Psychology - University of Brasília]. It aims at publishing original papers related to Psychology that fit into the following categories: research report, theoretical study, report of professional experience, critical literature review, short communication, letter to editor, technical note, review. News may also be published at the editor"s discretion. The authors assume responsibility for the articles signed; opinions and considerations included in the articles do not necessarily express the standing point of the Editorial Board.