Analysis of Sexually Transmitted Infections Prevention Campaigns between 2008 and 2020

Q4 Psychology

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1590/0102.3772e39414.en

André Teixeira Stephanou, Isabella Kahl de Freitas, Ana Cristina Garcia Dias

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to analyze the sexually transmitted infections (STIs) prevention campaigns promoted by the Brazilian Ministry of Health between 2008 and 2020. Fifty-three campaigns from the digital archive were included in the directed content analysis. The analysis was conducted based on the concepts of Combination Prevention and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Condom use and STI testing were constantly promoted, to the detriment of alternative preventive behaviors. The TPB concepts in the campaigns suggest the compatibility of the materials with the theory. We conclude that the campaigns present the desirable aspects of prevention. However, recent campaigns focused on aversive materials, which goes against studies that report negative effects from these strategies and is associated with the rise of moralist perspectives on prevention.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2008 - 2020年性传播感染预防运动分析

摘要本研究旨在分析2008年至2020年巴西卫生部推动的性传播感染(STIs)预防运动。来自数字档案的53个活动被纳入定向内容分析。基于组合预防的概念和计划行为理论(TPB)进行分析。避孕套的使用和性传播感染的检测不断得到推广，损害了其他预防行为。运动中的TPB概念表明材料与理论的相容性。我们的结论是，这些运动提供了预防的理想方面。然而，最近的运动侧重于令人反感的材料，这与报告这些策略的负面影响的研究相悖，并与道德主义预防观点的兴起有关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa is a journal published every three months by Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de Brasília [Institute of Psychology - University of Brasília]. It aims at publishing original papers related to Psychology that fit into the following categories: research report, theoretical study, report of professional experience, critical literature review, short communication, letter to editor, technical note, review. News may also be published at the editor"s discretion. The authors assume responsibility for the articles signed; opinions and considerations included in the articles do not necessarily express the standing point of the Editorial Board.