Mental Health and Psychological Assessment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review

Q4 Psychology

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0102.3772e38425.en

Silvana Alba Scortegagna, Eduardo dos Santos de Lima, A. C. B. D. Marchi, M. R. Portella

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to identify the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of adult populations and verify the assessment resources employed. From a systematic review according to PRISMA recommendations, 1,158 articles were identified in the databases Pubmed, PsycINFO, PePSIC and Scielo, of which 54 met the eligibility criteria for analysis. The populations surveyed included adults in general, health professionals and elderly adults; symptoms of anxiety and depression were the most reported; there was expressive diversity in the assessment resources applied on-line. Prevention policies, promotion of mental health for the most vulnerable populations, as well as the development of evaluation tests with evidence of validity for on-line application, are a pressing reality.

查看原文本刊更多论文

COVID-19大流行期间的心理健康和心理评估:系统综述

摘要本研究旨在了解新冠肺炎大流行对成年人群心理健康的影响，并验证所采用的评估资源。根据PRISMA推荐的系统评价，在Pubmed、PsycINFO、PePSIC和Scielo数据库中鉴定出1158篇文章，其中54篇符合分析资格标准。调查对象包括一般成年人、保健专业人员和老年人;焦虑和抑郁的症状是报告最多的;网上应用的评估资源表现出多样性。预防政策、促进最脆弱人群的心理健康以及开发具有有效性证据的评价测试，以供在线应用，是一项紧迫的现实。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa is a journal published every three months by Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de Brasília [Institute of Psychology - University of Brasília]. It aims at publishing original papers related to Psychology that fit into the following categories: research report, theoretical study, report of professional experience, critical literature review, short communication, letter to editor, technical note, review. News may also be published at the editor"s discretion. The authors assume responsibility for the articles signed; opinions and considerations included in the articles do not necessarily express the standing point of the Editorial Board.