Die probleem van historiese skuld in Suid-Afrika The problem of historical guilt in South Africa

IF 0.2 4区 文学 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES
L. Scholtz
{"title":"Die probleem van historiese skuld in Suid-Afrika The problem of historical guilt in South Africa","authors":"L. Scholtz","doi":"10.17159/2224-7912/2022/v62n1a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OPSOMMING Historiese skuld is ten beste 'n baie problematiese konsep. Dit word duidelik geïllustreer deur die Duitse geskiedenis sedert 1945, toe die Duitsers vir hulself rekenskap moes gee van hul optrede in die jare 1933-1945.1 Wié het wát aan wié gedoen? Wie besluit oor die vraag van skuld of onskuld van wie? En wie of wat gee hulle die reg om dit te doen? Welke morele of regsbeginsels word in die proses gebruik? Ook: Hoe ver moet in die tyd teruggegaan word? Na Columbus se aankoms in die Nuwe Wêreld in 1492? Na Jan van Riebeeck se koms na die Kaap in 1652? Na die \"Scramble for Africa\" in die negentiende eeu? Die verwoesting van die Boererepublieke en die groot sterfte van die Republikeinse burgerlike bevolking in die konsentrasiekampe in 1899-1902? Die begin van apartheid in 1948? Dit is vrae wat nie so maklik beantwoord kan word nie. Tog, gebeure wat 'n sekere morele grens oorskry - soos die volksmoord op die Jode in die Tweede Wereldoorlog, die Rwandese volksmoord van 1994, of die etniese \"suiwering\" in die Balkan in dieselfde tyd - het uitgekristalliseer in 'n bepaalde konsensus oor internasionale optrede rakende menseregte in die breedste sin van die woord, en dit is geformaliseer in 'n sekere juridiese benadering oor die saak. Oor die kwessie van historiese skuld in Suid-Afrika is, in elk geval op politieke vlak, reeds besluit. Die paradigma wat die ANC aan die Waarheids-en-Versoeningskommissie (WVK) voorgehou het - wat, met sekere nuanses, basies deur die WVK aanvaar is - was dat daar twee kante in die bevrydingstryd was. Oorvereenvoudig, was dit die \"siegte ouens\" (die apartheidsregering) teen die \"goeie ouens\" (die bevrydingsbewegings, veral die ANC/SAKP). Trefwoorde: Apartheid, kommunisme, ANC/SAKP, Nazisme, Karl Jaspers, Alfred Nzo, Oliver Tambo, Nelson Mandela, pres. FW de Klerk, Afrikanernasionalisme, Lenin, Gandhi, Albert Luthuli, Kabwe, MK, Chris Hani, WVK, Joe Slovo ABSTRACT South Africans are very quick to accuse one another of having been very bad in the past. Afrikaners are accused of severe race discrimination in the form of apartheid. They are portrayed as uniquely evil, almost as bad as the Nazi's in the Second World War. At the same time, especially the ANC/SACP is accused of severe transgressions, such as terrorism in the name of a freedom struggle, supportfor a totalitarian system in the form of Marxism-Leninism, and extreme intolerance of deviant viewpoints in the liberation movement. It would be wrong to view the matter in a simplified way, as the problem of historical guilt is a complex one. In this article, the problem is, firstly, examined from an ethical perspective. Apartheid must be recognised as - when viewed from a Christian viewpoint - immoral and wrong. The policy is examined in detail, with the conclusion that, while there were fleeting moments in which things could have developed more positively, these moments were still-born. Subsequently, the accusation that apartheid was akin to Nazism is examined. It is concluded that, while there were superficial similarities, the differences were too deep, in principle, to be taken seriously. Another aspect that should be seriously considered is why the Afrikaners actually acted in a particular way. Without defending what they had done, it is clear that they, in their own minds, were convinced that the very survival of Afrikaners as a people was at stake amidst threatening historical circumstances exemplified by the political, cultural and economic onslaught of British imperialism, as well as the looming shadow of a vastly superior majority of black people. Lastly, there is the question as to whether the ANC/SACP also has historical guilt to carry. In the light of the way in which the very Kremlin-loyal SACP during the years took over the leadership of the alliance, the answer must be yes. The alliance wanted to replace apartheid with Communism, a policy which has as severe ethical problems as may be ascribed to apartheid. Also, the alliance handled dissenters in an extremely intolerant way by locking them up in concentration camps, where they were treated very cruelly. It is hoped that a nuanced treatise like this could promote a public debate in South Africa. Keywords: Apartheid, communism, ANC/SACP, Nazis, Karl Jaspers, Alfred Nzo, Oliver Tambo, Nelson Mandela, President FW de Klerk, Afrikaner nationalism, Lenin, Gandhi, Albert Luthuli, Kabwe, MK, Chris Hani, TRC, Joe Slovo","PeriodicalId":42800,"journal":{"name":"Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2022/v62n1a4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OPSOMMING Historiese skuld is ten beste 'n baie problematiese konsep. Dit word duidelik geïllustreer deur die Duitse geskiedenis sedert 1945, toe die Duitsers vir hulself rekenskap moes gee van hul optrede in die jare 1933-1945.1 Wié het wát aan wié gedoen? Wie besluit oor die vraag van skuld of onskuld van wie? En wie of wat gee hulle die reg om dit te doen? Welke morele of regsbeginsels word in die proses gebruik? Ook: Hoe ver moet in die tyd teruggegaan word? Na Columbus se aankoms in die Nuwe Wêreld in 1492? Na Jan van Riebeeck se koms na die Kaap in 1652? Na die "Scramble for Africa" in die negentiende eeu? Die verwoesting van die Boererepublieke en die groot sterfte van die Republikeinse burgerlike bevolking in die konsentrasiekampe in 1899-1902? Die begin van apartheid in 1948? Dit is vrae wat nie so maklik beantwoord kan word nie. Tog, gebeure wat 'n sekere morele grens oorskry - soos die volksmoord op die Jode in die Tweede Wereldoorlog, die Rwandese volksmoord van 1994, of die etniese "suiwering" in die Balkan in dieselfde tyd - het uitgekristalliseer in 'n bepaalde konsensus oor internasionale optrede rakende menseregte in die breedste sin van die woord, en dit is geformaliseer in 'n sekere juridiese benadering oor die saak. Oor die kwessie van historiese skuld in Suid-Afrika is, in elk geval op politieke vlak, reeds besluit. Die paradigma wat die ANC aan die Waarheids-en-Versoeningskommissie (WVK) voorgehou het - wat, met sekere nuanses, basies deur die WVK aanvaar is - was dat daar twee kante in die bevrydingstryd was. Oorvereenvoudig, was dit die "siegte ouens" (die apartheidsregering) teen die "goeie ouens" (die bevrydingsbewegings, veral die ANC/SAKP). Trefwoorde: Apartheid, kommunisme, ANC/SAKP, Nazisme, Karl Jaspers, Alfred Nzo, Oliver Tambo, Nelson Mandela, pres. FW de Klerk, Afrikanernasionalisme, Lenin, Gandhi, Albert Luthuli, Kabwe, MK, Chris Hani, WVK, Joe Slovo ABSTRACT South Africans are very quick to accuse one another of having been very bad in the past. Afrikaners are accused of severe race discrimination in the form of apartheid. They are portrayed as uniquely evil, almost as bad as the Nazi's in the Second World War. At the same time, especially the ANC/SACP is accused of severe transgressions, such as terrorism in the name of a freedom struggle, supportfor a totalitarian system in the form of Marxism-Leninism, and extreme intolerance of deviant viewpoints in the liberation movement. It would be wrong to view the matter in a simplified way, as the problem of historical guilt is a complex one. In this article, the problem is, firstly, examined from an ethical perspective. Apartheid must be recognised as - when viewed from a Christian viewpoint - immoral and wrong. The policy is examined in detail, with the conclusion that, while there were fleeting moments in which things could have developed more positively, these moments were still-born. Subsequently, the accusation that apartheid was akin to Nazism is examined. It is concluded that, while there were superficial similarities, the differences were too deep, in principle, to be taken seriously. Another aspect that should be seriously considered is why the Afrikaners actually acted in a particular way. Without defending what they had done, it is clear that they, in their own minds, were convinced that the very survival of Afrikaners as a people was at stake amidst threatening historical circumstances exemplified by the political, cultural and economic onslaught of British imperialism, as well as the looming shadow of a vastly superior majority of black people. Lastly, there is the question as to whether the ANC/SACP also has historical guilt to carry. In the light of the way in which the very Kremlin-loyal SACP during the years took over the leadership of the alliance, the answer must be yes. The alliance wanted to replace apartheid with Communism, a policy which has as severe ethical problems as may be ascribed to apartheid. Also, the alliance handled dissenters in an extremely intolerant way by locking them up in concentration camps, where they were treated very cruelly. It is hoped that a nuanced treatise like this could promote a public debate in South Africa. Keywords: Apartheid, communism, ANC/SACP, Nazis, Karl Jaspers, Alfred Nzo, Oliver Tambo, Nelson Mandela, President FW de Klerk, Afrikaner nationalism, Lenin, Gandhi, Albert Luthuli, Kabwe, MK, Chris Hani, TRC, Joe Slovo
南非历史罪恶感的问题
OPSOMMING历史债务充其量是一个非常有问题的概念。1945年以来的德国历史清楚地说明了这一点,当时德国人不得不在1933-1945年支付账单。1他们做了什么?谁来决定谁有罪或无罪的问题?谁,或者谁赋予他们这样做的权利?在这个过程中使用了什么样的恶意软件或处理过程?Ook:你在说什么?1492年哥伦布到达新大陆?1652年里贝克的简抵达开普后?在十九世纪的“争夺非洲”之后?1899-1902年布尔共和国的毁灭和集中营中共和党人的强大力量?1948年种族隔离的开始?这是一个不容易回答的问题。然而,跨越某种道德边界的事件——例如第二次世界大战中犹太人被谋杀、1994年俄罗斯人民被谋杀,或者同时发生在巴尔干半岛的种族“自杀”——在最广义的国际人类活动的某种共识中受到了批评,它是在某个特定的法律框架中正式确立的。然而,南非历史债务的挑战已经决定。ANC和Waarheids en Versoeningskommissie(WVK)的支持者们在一起,遇到了新的支持者,而WVK的支持者们则在一起。不幸的是,是“贫穷的青少年”(公寓管理层)反对“优秀的青少年”,尤其是ANC/SAKP运动。Trefwoord:种族隔离、共产主义、ANC/SAKP、纳粹主义、Karl Jaspers、Alfred Nzo、Oliver Tambo、Nelson Mandela、FW de Klerk主席、Afrikanernasionalisme、Lenin、Gandhi、Albert Luthuli、Kabwe、MK、Chris Hani、WVK、Joe Slovo摘要南非人很快就指责彼此过去做得很糟糕。南非白人被指控以种族隔离的形式存在严重的种族歧视。他们被描绘成独一无二的邪恶,几乎和第二次世界大战中的纳粹一样糟糕。与此同时,特别是ANC/SACP被指控犯有严重的违法行为,例如以自由斗争的名义进行的恐怖主义,以马克思列宁主义的形式支持极权主义制度,以及对解放运动中越轨观点的极端不容忍。简单地看待这件事是错误的,因为历史罪责问题是一个复杂的问题。在这篇文章中,首先从伦理的角度来审视这个问题。从基督教的角度来看,种族隔离必须被视为不道德和错误的。对该政策进行了详细审查,得出的结论是,尽管有一些短暂的时刻,事情本可以发展得更积极,但这些时刻仍然诞生了。随后,对种族隔离类似于纳粹主义的指控进行了审查。结论是,虽然表面上有相似之处,但原则上差异太深,不值得认真对待。另一个应该认真考虑的方面是,为什么南非白人实际上以一种特殊的方式行事。在没有为他们的所作所为辩护的情况下,很明显,他们自己认为,在英国帝国主义的政治、文化和经济冲击以及绝大多数黑人的阴影笼罩下的威胁性历史环境中,南非白人作为一个民族的生存岌岌可危。最后,还有一个问题是,非国大/SACP是否也有历史罪责。鉴于多年来忠于克里姆林宫的SACP接管联盟领导权的方式,答案肯定是肯定的。该联盟希望用共产主义取代种族隔离,这一政策存在着与种族隔离一样严重的道德问题。此外,该联盟以一种极其不宽容的方式处理持不同政见者,将他们关在集中营,在那里他们受到非常残酷的对待。人们希望,像这样细致入微的论文能够在南非引发一场公开辩论。关键词:种族隔离,共产主义,ANC/SACP,纳粹,Karl Jaspers,Alfred Nzo,Oliver Tambo,Nelson Mandela,FW de Klerk总统,非洲民族主义,列宁,甘地,Albert Luthuli,Kabwe,MK,Chris Hani,TRC,Joe Slovo
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Die Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe word gewy aan die publikasie van oorspronklike navorsing en oorsigartikels in die teologie, kuns en kulturele, sosiale, ekonomiese en opvoedkundige wetenskappe, sowel as aan boekbesprekings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信