Contingency Management applied to Alcohol Use Disorder: Systematic Review

Q4 Psychology

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0102.3772e38215.en

Karina de Souza Silva, Angelo A. S. Sampaio, André Q. C. Miguel

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of applying Contingency Management (CM) to Alcohol Use Disorder. We followed the PRISMA recommendation and consulted the following databases: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO and Pubmed. A total of eight randomized controlled trials were included in this review, all of them with good methodological quality. In seven of these, CM was more efficacious in promoting continuous abstinence. Both trials that evaluated treatment retention found statistically significant results favorable to CM. On two of the three trials presenting follow-up results, CM was more efficacious in promoting abstinence. The large-scale application of CM can promote substantial public health improvements and should be encouraged.

查看原文本刊更多论文

应急管理在酒精使用障碍中的应用:系统综述

本系统综述评价了应急管理(CM)在酒精使用障碍中的应用效果。我们遵循PRISMA的建议，并参考了以下数据库:Cochrane Library、MEDLINE Complete、PsycINFO和Pubmed。本综述共纳入8项随机对照试验，均具有良好的方法学质量。在其中的7例中，CM在促进持续禁欲方面更有效。两项评估治疗保留的试验均发现有利于CM的统计显著结果。三个试验中有两个提出了随访结果，CM在促进禁欲方面更有效。CM的大规模应用可以促进公共卫生的实质性改善，应予以鼓励。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa is a journal published every three months by Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de Brasília [Institute of Psychology - University of Brasília]. It aims at publishing original papers related to Psychology that fit into the following categories: research report, theoretical study, report of professional experience, critical literature review, short communication, letter to editor, technical note, review. News may also be published at the editor"s discretion. The authors assume responsibility for the articles signed; opinions and considerations included in the articles do not necessarily express the standing point of the Editorial Board.