From ‘The West and the Rest’ to Global Interconnectedness: China Historians and the Transformation of World History as a Discipline

IF 0.1 0 ASIAN STUDIES
R. Eng
{"title":"From ‘The West and the Rest’ to Global Interconnectedness: China Historians and the Transformation of World History as a Discipline","authors":"R. Eng","doi":"10.16995/ANE.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Representative of the Eurocentric perspective in world history texts and scholarship is David Landes' The Wealth and Poverty of Nations . He argues that European culture was key to its achievement of wealth and power, and that China was doomed to fail by its \"cultural triumphalism\" and \"petty downward tyranny.\" By adopting a globalist and comparative framework and disputing European exceptionalism, Andre Gunder Frank's ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian Age , R. Bin Wong's China Transformed , and Kenneth Pomeranz's The Great Divergence contribute to world history scholarship and teaching. These works collectively make the forceful case for Europe's rise as contingent on external and accidental factors such as the fortuitous abundance of readily accessible coal in Britain and the windfall profits from the Atlantic slave trade and the American colonies. They propose an inclusive vision of history that emphasizes multiple paths and possibilities rather than a single and inevitable path of the rise of industrialism in the West.","PeriodicalId":41163,"journal":{"name":"ASIANetwork Exchange-A Journal for Asian Studies in the Liberal Arts","volume":"22 1","pages":"35-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIANetwork Exchange-A Journal for Asian Studies in the Liberal Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/ANE.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Representative of the Eurocentric perspective in world history texts and scholarship is David Landes' The Wealth and Poverty of Nations . He argues that European culture was key to its achievement of wealth and power, and that China was doomed to fail by its "cultural triumphalism" and "petty downward tyranny." By adopting a globalist and comparative framework and disputing European exceptionalism, Andre Gunder Frank's ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian Age , R. Bin Wong's China Transformed , and Kenneth Pomeranz's The Great Divergence contribute to world history scholarship and teaching. These works collectively make the forceful case for Europe's rise as contingent on external and accidental factors such as the fortuitous abundance of readily accessible coal in Britain and the windfall profits from the Atlantic slave trade and the American colonies. They propose an inclusive vision of history that emphasizes multiple paths and possibilities rather than a single and inevitable path of the rise of industrialism in the West.
从“西方与其他”到全球互联:中国历史学家与世界史学科的转型
在世界史文本和学术中,欧洲中心主义观点的代表是大卫·兰德斯的《国家的财富与贫穷》。他认为,欧洲文化是中国取得财富和权力的关键,而中国注定要失败,因为它的“文化必胜主义”和“狭隘的向下暴政”。安德烈·冈德·弗兰克的《重新定位:亚洲时代的全球经济》、王斌的《中国转型》和彭慕兰的《大分流》采用了全球主义和比较的框架,并对欧洲例外论提出了质疑。这些著作共同有力地证明,欧洲的崛起取决于外部和偶然因素,比如英国偶然拥有丰富的煤炭资源,大西洋奴隶贸易和美国殖民地带来的暴利。他们提出了一种包容性的历史观,强调多种道路和可能性,而不是西方工业主义崛起的单一和不可避免的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信