Case-mismatches in Korean left-node-raising: An experimental study

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Linguistic Research Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.005

Jeong-Seok Kim, Yun-young Kim, DUK-HO Jung

{"title":"Case-mismatches in Korean left-node-raising: An experimental study","authors":"Jeong-Seok Kim, Yun-young Kim, DUK-HO Jung","doi":"10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kim, Jeong-Seok, Yunhui Kim, and Duk-Ho Jung. 2020. Case-mismatches in Korean left-node-raising: An experimental study. Linguistic Research 37(3): 499-529. The goal of this article is to investigate Case-mismatches in Korean Left-Node-Raising (LNR) via the utility of experimental syntax techniques. To achieve this goal, we use the 2 × 2 factorial design of two Case-mismatch types (accusative vs. dative Case) of Korean LNR with respect to the locus of Case-licensing/mismatches (the first vs. second conjunct). The result of the experiment suggests that the first conjunct Case-licensing of the fronted NP in LNR is crucial across Case types, indicating that symmetric approaches (cf. Nakao’s (2009, 2010) across-the-board (ATB) Scrambling and Chung’s (2010) Multidominance) to LNR is not the right avenue to pursue. It also suggests that there is a distinction between structural Case-licensing and inherent Case-licensing in LNR (cf. Chomsky 1986, 1995; Bošković 2008). We review three syntactic analyses of Case-mismatch effects in LNR (ATB Scrambling, Multidominance, and Scrambling + pro) and defend the Scrambling + pro analysis. (Korea University · UW-Milwaukee · UC San Diego)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"499-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kim, Jeong-Seok, Yunhui Kim, and Duk-Ho Jung. 2020. Case-mismatches in Korean left-node-raising: An experimental study. Linguistic Research 37(3): 499-529. The goal of this article is to investigate Case-mismatches in Korean Left-Node-Raising (LNR) via the utility of experimental syntax techniques. To achieve this goal, we use the 2 × 2 factorial design of two Case-mismatch types (accusative vs. dative Case) of Korean LNR with respect to the locus of Case-licensing/mismatches (the first vs. second conjunct). The result of the experiment suggests that the first conjunct Case-licensing of the fronted NP in LNR is crucial across Case types, indicating that symmetric approaches (cf. Nakao’s (2009, 2010) across-the-board (ATB) Scrambling and Chung’s (2010) Multidominance) to LNR is not the right avenue to pursue. It also suggests that there is a distinction between structural Case-licensing and inherent Case-licensing in LNR (cf. Chomsky 1986, 1995; Bošković 2008). We review three syntactic analyses of Case-mismatch effects in LNR (ATB Scrambling, Multidominance, and Scrambling + pro) and defend the Scrambling + pro analysis. (Korea University · UW-Milwaukee · UC San Diego)

查看原文本刊更多论文

韩国语左节点抬高的案例不匹配:一项实验研究

Kim, Jeong-Seok, Kim Yunhui, Jung - ho, 2020。韩国语左节点抬高的案例不匹配:一项实验研究。语言研究37(3):499-529。本文的目的是通过使用实验语法技术来研究朝鲜语左节点提升(LNR)中的大小写不匹配。为了实现这一目标，我们对韩国LNR的两种Case-mismatch类型(宾格与格格)的案例许可/不匹配位点(第一个与第二个连词)使用了2 × 2析因设计。实验结果表明，LNR中前端NP的第一个联合Case许可在所有Case类型中都是至关重要的，这表明LNR的对称方法(参见Nakao(2009, 2010)的全面(ATB)置乱和Chung(2010)的多支配)不是正确的途径。它还表明，在LNR中存在结构性案例许可和内在案例许可的区别(cf. Chomsky 1986, 1995;2008年博šković)。我们回顾了三种句法分析(ATB加扰、Multidominance和加扰+ pro)，并对加扰+ pro分析进行了论证。(高丽大学·威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校·加州大学圣地亚哥分校)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Linguistic Research LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.