{"title":"Neurogenic hyperpyrexia following acute traumatic spinal cord injury. A Systematic Review","authors":"P. Korovessis","doi":"10.15761/crt.1000264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Design : Systematic review. Objective : To report the incidence, pathogenesis, treatment options and outcomes related to neurogenic hyperpyrexia following acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods : A systematic review was performed on hyperpyrexia secondary to acute traumatic SCI in adult patients. A literature search was performed using PubMed and available literature. Results : Using the headings terms “Spinal Cord Injury” and “Fever” and after removing duplicates, 292 articles were collected independently of the number of cases included. Papers with fever of other etiology than neurogenic hyperpyrexia were subsequently excluded. In this last search 9 original articles were selected, from which only 4 fulfilled the criteria for this systematic review. Cervical was much more often than thoracic SCI associated with hyperpyrexia. Although the incidence of fever of all origins after SCI averaged 50.5%, (range 22.5 to 71.7%) the incidence of neurogenic hyperpyrexia in patients sustained acute SCI averaged 8.0%, (range 2.6 to 27.8%). ASIA A SCI had a higher incidence of hyperpyrexia than ASIA B to D incomplete SCI injuries. The pathogenesis of so-called “neurogenic hyperpyrexia” following reported acute SCI is not thoroughly understood, and mostly cases have been. Few methods for treatment of hyperpyrexia have been suggested including steroids, cooling, combined steroids and hypothermia and endovascular cooling Conclusion : Neurogenic hyperpyrexia is a relatively common clinical entity following acute SCI. However, there is little literature to help physicians prevent or treat this potential fatal condition. Further studies with larger sample sizes, focusing on incidence rate, clinical outcomes, and pathogenesis of neurogenic hyperpyrexia following acute traumatic SCI are needed. The results of this systematic review that are based on very few clinical studies suggest further research with controlled clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":90808,"journal":{"name":"Clinical research and trials","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical research and trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/crt.1000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study Design : Systematic review. Objective : To report the incidence, pathogenesis, treatment options and outcomes related to neurogenic hyperpyrexia following acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods : A systematic review was performed on hyperpyrexia secondary to acute traumatic SCI in adult patients. A literature search was performed using PubMed and available literature. Results : Using the headings terms “Spinal Cord Injury” and “Fever” and after removing duplicates, 292 articles were collected independently of the number of cases included. Papers with fever of other etiology than neurogenic hyperpyrexia were subsequently excluded. In this last search 9 original articles were selected, from which only 4 fulfilled the criteria for this systematic review. Cervical was much more often than thoracic SCI associated with hyperpyrexia. Although the incidence of fever of all origins after SCI averaged 50.5%, (range 22.5 to 71.7%) the incidence of neurogenic hyperpyrexia in patients sustained acute SCI averaged 8.0%, (range 2.6 to 27.8%). ASIA A SCI had a higher incidence of hyperpyrexia than ASIA B to D incomplete SCI injuries. The pathogenesis of so-called “neurogenic hyperpyrexia” following reported acute SCI is not thoroughly understood, and mostly cases have been. Few methods for treatment of hyperpyrexia have been suggested including steroids, cooling, combined steroids and hypothermia and endovascular cooling Conclusion : Neurogenic hyperpyrexia is a relatively common clinical entity following acute SCI. However, there is little literature to help physicians prevent or treat this potential fatal condition. Further studies with larger sample sizes, focusing on incidence rate, clinical outcomes, and pathogenesis of neurogenic hyperpyrexia following acute traumatic SCI are needed. The results of this systematic review that are based on very few clinical studies suggest further research with controlled clinical trials.
研究设计:系统评价。目的:报道急性外伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)后神经源性高热的发生率、发病机制、治疗方案及转归。方法:对成人急性外伤性脊髓损伤继发高热进行系统回顾。使用PubMed和现有文献进行文献检索。结果:以“脊髓损伤”和“发热”为标题,剔除重复项后,收集到292篇独立于病例数的文献。除神经源性高热外,其他病因的发热被排除在外。在最后的检索中选择了9篇原创文章,其中只有4篇符合本系统评价的标准。与高热相关的颈椎脊髓损伤要比胸椎脊髓损伤多。尽管脊髓损伤后所有来源的发热发生率平均为50.5%(范围为22.5%至71.7%),急性脊髓损伤患者神经源性高热的发生率平均为8.0%(范围为2.6%至27.8%)。ASIA A型脊髓损伤的高热发生率高于ASIA B ~ D型不完全性脊髓损伤。报道的急性脊髓损伤后所谓的“神经源性高热”的发病机制尚不完全清楚,大多数病例已被完全了解。结论:神经源性高热是急性脊髓损伤后较为常见的临床症状。然而,很少有文献可以帮助医生预防或治疗这种潜在的致命疾病。急性外伤性脊髓损伤后神经源性高热的发生率、临床结果和发病机制需要进一步的大样本量研究。这一系统综述的结果基于很少的临床研究,建议进一步进行对照临床试验。