Explicit instruction in an EFL writing class: A process-genre perspective

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jiwon Paek
{"title":"Explicit instruction in an EFL writing class: A process-genre perspective","authors":"Jiwon Paek","doi":"10.17250/KHISLI.37..202009.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examined the role of explicit writing instruction in an EFL college writing class from the perspective of a process-genre approach to teaching. To evaluate the effect of explicit instruction on writing improvement, a writing rubric was used, which measured the five areas of writing development such as ‘Purpose’, ‘Organization’, ‘Elaboration’, ‘Voice’, and ‘Grammar. L2 writing proficiency was used as a unit of analysis to evaluate writing development. Specifically, the students in two proficiency groups were required to perform the set of genre-writing tasks, Narrative and Argumentative essays, under pre-test and post-test conditions. The results showed that explicit instruction under the process-genre approach helped to improve students’ writing skills, but the relative effects differed according to L2 writing proficiency. More specifically, the more proficiency group showed the improvement in the four areas of the rubric measures except for ‘Grammar.’ On the other hand, the less proficiency group experienced the improvement only in two rubric measures, or ‘Organization’ and ‘Purpose.’ This indicates the important role of L2 writing proficiency in incorporating a process-genre approach into traditional writing classrooms. This paper argues that L2 proficiency should be considered an essential part of teaching practices under the process-genre approach to writing. (Mokpo National University · Daegu University)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"31-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/KHISLI.37..202009.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examined the role of explicit writing instruction in an EFL college writing class from the perspective of a process-genre approach to teaching. To evaluate the effect of explicit instruction on writing improvement, a writing rubric was used, which measured the five areas of writing development such as ‘Purpose’, ‘Organization’, ‘Elaboration’, ‘Voice’, and ‘Grammar. L2 writing proficiency was used as a unit of analysis to evaluate writing development. Specifically, the students in two proficiency groups were required to perform the set of genre-writing tasks, Narrative and Argumentative essays, under pre-test and post-test conditions. The results showed that explicit instruction under the process-genre approach helped to improve students’ writing skills, but the relative effects differed according to L2 writing proficiency. More specifically, the more proficiency group showed the improvement in the four areas of the rubric measures except for ‘Grammar.’ On the other hand, the less proficiency group experienced the improvement only in two rubric measures, or ‘Organization’ and ‘Purpose.’ This indicates the important role of L2 writing proficiency in incorporating a process-genre approach into traditional writing classrooms. This paper argues that L2 proficiency should be considered an essential part of teaching practices under the process-genre approach to writing. (Mokpo National University · Daegu University)
英语写作课堂上的显性教学:过程体裁视角
本研究从过程体裁教学法的角度探讨了显性写作教学在大学英语写作课堂中的作用。为了评估明确指导对写作改进的影响,使用了一个写作标准,它衡量了写作发展的五个方面,如“目的”、“组织”、“阐述”、“声音”和“语法”。第二语言写作能力被用作评估写作发展的分析单位。具体地说,两个熟练小组的学生被要求在测试前和测试后的条件下完成一组体裁写作任务,叙事性和议论文。结果表明,过程体裁教学法下的显性教学有助于提高学生的写作技能,但其相对效果因二语写作水平的不同而不同。更具体地说,除了“语法”之外,熟练程度更高的小组在四个方面都有所改善。另一方面,熟练程度较低的一组只在“组织”和“目的”两个指标上有所改善。这表明了第二语言写作能力在将过程体裁方法融入传统写作课堂中的重要作用。本文认为,在过程体裁教学法下,二语熟练程度应被视为教学实践的重要组成部分。(木浦大学·大邱大学)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Linguistic Research
Linguistic Research LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信