Changing Text: A Social Semiotic Analysis of Textbooks

J. Bezemer, G. Kress
{"title":"Changing Text: A Social Semiotic Analysis of Textbooks","authors":"J. Bezemer, G. Kress","doi":"10.16993/DFL.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we provide a multimodal account of historical changes in secondary school textbooks in England and their social significance. Adopting a social semiotic approach to text and text making we review learning resources across core subjects of the English national curriculum, English, Science and Mathematics. Comparing textbooks from the 1930s, 1980s and 2000s, we show that a) all modes operating in textbooks -typography, image, writing and layout- contribute to meaning and potential for learning b) that the use of these modes has changed between 1930 and now, in ways significant for social relations between and across makers and users of textbooks. Designers and readers / learners now take responsibility for coherence, which was previously the exclusive domain of authors. Where previously reading paths were fixed by makers it may now be left to learners to establish these according to their interests. For users of textbooks the changes in design demand new forms of ‘literacy’; a fluency not only in ‘reading’ writing, image, typography and layout jointly, but in the overall design of learning environments. We place these changes against the backdrop of wider social changes and features of the contemporary media landscape, recognizing a shift from stability, canonicity and vertical power structures to ‘horizontal’, more open, participatory relations in the production of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":31187,"journal":{"name":"Designs for Learning","volume":"3 1","pages":"10-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"74","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs for Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16993/DFL.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74

Abstract

In this paper we provide a multimodal account of historical changes in secondary school textbooks in England and their social significance. Adopting a social semiotic approach to text and text making we review learning resources across core subjects of the English national curriculum, English, Science and Mathematics. Comparing textbooks from the 1930s, 1980s and 2000s, we show that a) all modes operating in textbooks -typography, image, writing and layout- contribute to meaning and potential for learning b) that the use of these modes has changed between 1930 and now, in ways significant for social relations between and across makers and users of textbooks. Designers and readers / learners now take responsibility for coherence, which was previously the exclusive domain of authors. Where previously reading paths were fixed by makers it may now be left to learners to establish these according to their interests. For users of textbooks the changes in design demand new forms of ‘literacy’; a fluency not only in ‘reading’ writing, image, typography and layout jointly, but in the overall design of learning environments. We place these changes against the backdrop of wider social changes and features of the contemporary media landscape, recognizing a shift from stability, canonicity and vertical power structures to ‘horizontal’, more open, participatory relations in the production of knowledge.
变化的文本:教科书的社会符号学分析
本文对英国中学教科书的历史变迁及其社会意义进行了多模式分析。采用社会符号学的方法对文本和文本制作进行研究,我们回顾了英语国家课程的核心科目,英语,科学和数学的学习资源。通过对比20世纪30年代、80年代和21世纪初的教科书,我们发现:a)教科书中使用的所有模式——排版、图像、写作和布局——都有助于学习的意义和潜力;b)从1930年到现在,这些模式的使用发生了变化,对教科书制造者和使用者之间以及他们之间的社会关系具有重要意义。设计师和读者/学习者现在要对连贯性负责,而连贯性以前是作者的专属领域。以前的阅读路径是由制作者固定的,现在则由学习者根据自己的兴趣来建立。对于教科书的使用者来说,设计的变化需要新的“识字”形式;不仅在“阅读”、写作、图像、排版和布局方面具有流畅性,而且在学习环境的整体设计方面也具有流畅性。我们将这些变化置于更广泛的社会变化和当代媒体景观的背景下,认识到知识生产从稳定、规范和垂直权力结构向“水平”、更开放、参与性关系的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信