Researching Collective Action Through Networks: Taking Stock and Looking Forward

IF 1.3 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Nina Eggert, E. Pavan
{"title":"Researching Collective Action Through Networks: Taking Stock and Looking Forward","authors":"Nina Eggert, E. Pavan","doi":"10.17813/MAIQ.19.4.5415176RJ6WT3Q42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guest editing a special issue on networks and collective action could be interpreted as a response to the ubiquitous use of these terms in both public and academic discourses. As others have noted, thinking that “networks are everywhere” has become a daily routine (Brandes, Robins, McCranie, and Wasserman 2013: 2). Underpinning such a motto, is the diffusion of new information and communication technologies (ICTs), the Internet and social media in particular. ICTs have become a primary global infrastructure for the construction of relations across individuals, organizations, institutions, contents, and information in all domains. It is also true that recent episodes of contention like the Arab spring, the indignados, and occupy movements have tremendously intensified attention on collective civic participation. Most of this attention flows directly from two considerations. First, these mobilizations created hope for major changes in the worldwide political landscape and led to a serious reconsideration of political programs, authority relations, policy agendas, and development plans, even where narrow opportunities for success existed. Second, the widespread use of networked digital communications in the participatory efforts of these movements—and of many others—prompted widespread reflection on the “diffusion” and “transformation” of collective action dynamics across national borders, as well as across the online/offline boundary. While we are well aware of the current popularity of the nexus between networks and collective action, the motivations for this special issue are to be found elsewhere. The current enthusiasm represents to us a perfect window of opportunity to reactivate what, in fact, is a never-interrupted, long-term reflection on the potentialities of a network approach for the study of collective action. Despite being portrayed as benchmarks of our digital age, neither the tight relationship between networks and collective action nor the broader relevance of networks for our societies are new issues triggered by the development and diffusion of ICTs. The roots of a relational conceptualization of society are to be found in the seminal work of Simmel, and in the practical operationalizations of social environments by Moreno. Also, recent developments outside the social sciences in physics, mathematics, and statistics stress relational approaches (Marin and Wellman 2011, Brandes et al. 2013). Within social movement and collective action studies, a network perspective has emerged in the last twenty years as a flexible and, in our view, powerful tool to analyze the diversity, dynamics, and complexity of collective sociopolitical phenomena. Applications of a network approach are sometimes metaphorical in that they allow a more intelligible rendering of the","PeriodicalId":47309,"journal":{"name":"Mobilization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.19.4.5415176RJ6WT3Q42","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.19.4.5415176RJ6WT3Q42","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Guest editing a special issue on networks and collective action could be interpreted as a response to the ubiquitous use of these terms in both public and academic discourses. As others have noted, thinking that “networks are everywhere” has become a daily routine (Brandes, Robins, McCranie, and Wasserman 2013: 2). Underpinning such a motto, is the diffusion of new information and communication technologies (ICTs), the Internet and social media in particular. ICTs have become a primary global infrastructure for the construction of relations across individuals, organizations, institutions, contents, and information in all domains. It is also true that recent episodes of contention like the Arab spring, the indignados, and occupy movements have tremendously intensified attention on collective civic participation. Most of this attention flows directly from two considerations. First, these mobilizations created hope for major changes in the worldwide political landscape and led to a serious reconsideration of political programs, authority relations, policy agendas, and development plans, even where narrow opportunities for success existed. Second, the widespread use of networked digital communications in the participatory efforts of these movements—and of many others—prompted widespread reflection on the “diffusion” and “transformation” of collective action dynamics across national borders, as well as across the online/offline boundary. While we are well aware of the current popularity of the nexus between networks and collective action, the motivations for this special issue are to be found elsewhere. The current enthusiasm represents to us a perfect window of opportunity to reactivate what, in fact, is a never-interrupted, long-term reflection on the potentialities of a network approach for the study of collective action. Despite being portrayed as benchmarks of our digital age, neither the tight relationship between networks and collective action nor the broader relevance of networks for our societies are new issues triggered by the development and diffusion of ICTs. The roots of a relational conceptualization of society are to be found in the seminal work of Simmel, and in the practical operationalizations of social environments by Moreno. Also, recent developments outside the social sciences in physics, mathematics, and statistics stress relational approaches (Marin and Wellman 2011, Brandes et al. 2013). Within social movement and collective action studies, a network perspective has emerged in the last twenty years as a flexible and, in our view, powerful tool to analyze the diversity, dynamics, and complexity of collective sociopolitical phenomena. Applications of a network approach are sometimes metaphorical in that they allow a more intelligible rendering of the
通过网络研究集体行动:评估和展望
客座编辑关于网络和集体行动的特刊可以被解释为对这些术语在公共和学术话语中无处不在的使用的回应。正如其他人所指出的那样,认为“网络无处不在”已经成为一种日常习惯(Brandes, Robins, McCranie, and Wasserman 2013: 2)。支撑这种座右铭的是新信息通信技术(ict)的扩散,特别是互联网和社交媒体。信息通信技术已成为构建所有领域中个人、组织、机构、内容和信息之间关系的主要全球基础设施。同样,最近发生的阿拉伯之春、愤怒者运动和占领运动等事件也极大地加强了人们对集体公民参与的关注。这种关注大多直接来自两个方面。首先,这些动员为世界政治格局的重大变化创造了希望,并导致了对政治计划、权威关系、政策议程和发展计划的认真重新考虑,即使在存在成功机会的地方也是如此。其次,在这些运动和许多其他运动的参与性努力中广泛使用网络化数字通信,促使人们广泛反思集体行动动态的“扩散”和“转化”,这些动态跨越国界,也跨越线上/线下边界。虽然我们很清楚网络和集体行动之间的联系目前很受欢迎,但本期特刊的动机却在别处。目前的热情对我们来说是一个完美的机会窗口,可以重新激活实际上是对研究集体行动的网络方法的潜力进行的从未中断的长期反思。尽管网络被描绘成数字时代的标杆,但无论是网络与集体行动之间的紧密关系,还是网络对我们社会的广泛相关性,都不是信息通信技术发展和扩散引发的新问题。社会关系概念化的根源可以在齐美尔的开创性工作中找到,也可以在莫雷诺对社会环境的实际操作中找到。此外,社会科学以外的物理学、数学和统计学的最新发展强调了关系方法(Marin and Wellman 2011, Brandes et al. 2013)。在社会运动和集体行动研究中,网络视角在过去二十年中出现,在我们看来,它是一种灵活的、强大的工具,可以分析集体社会政治现象的多样性、动态性和复杂性。网络方法的应用程序有时是隐喻的,因为它们允许更容易理解的呈现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mobilization
Mobilization SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Mobilization: An International Quarterly is the premier journal of research specializing in social movements, protests, insurgencies, revolutions, and other forms of contentious politics. Mobilization was first published in 1996 to fill the need for a scholarly review of research that focused exclusively with social movements, protest and collective action. Mobilization is fully peer-reviewed and widely indexed. A 2003 study, when Mobilization was published semiannually, showed that its citation index rate was 1.286, which placed it among the top ten sociology journals. Today, Mobilization is published four times a year, in March, June, September, and December. The editorial board is composed of thirty internationally recognized scholars from political science, sociology and social psychology. The goal of Mobilization is to provide a forum for global, scholarly dialogue. It is currently distributed to the top international research libraries and read by the most engaged scholars in the field. We hope that through its wide distribution, different research strategies and theoretical/conceptual approaches will be shared among the global community of social movement scholars, encouraging a collaborative process that will further the development of a cumulative social science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信