C. Marcos, Antonio Gómez-Gil, Sergio García-Doménech
{"title":"Reflecting on eclecticism in garden heritage: The Monforte Gardens in Valencia as a case study","authors":"C. Marcos, Antonio Gómez-Gil, Sergio García-Doménech","doi":"10.17811/li.29.2023.127-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precedent historic styles were analysed and recovered by historicist revisionism and revivalism during the nineteenth century. The lack of a style of its century lead to eclecticism, a trend that involved a merging of diverse ornamental repertories. Accordingly, eclectic garden design employed historic styles of different origins. As the cities grew, suburban gardens were integrated within the urban sprawl. The Monforte Gardens in Valencia represent a relevant case study characteristic of nineteenth century major garden design and development transformations. Most significant are the design resources and strategies introduced in the original design by Sebastián Monléon and, subsequently by Javier de Winthuysen as this research —including a thorough redrawing of the garden layout— gives evidence of. The Monforte Gardens represent an eclectic urban gardening design example in which the different parts maintain their independence without losing an overall unitary concept. Although traditionally considered neoclassical gardens, this research argues they should be properly considered as eclectic romantic gardens.","PeriodicalId":40698,"journal":{"name":"Lino - Revista Anual de Historia del Arte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lino - Revista Anual de Historia del Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17811/li.29.2023.127-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Precedent historic styles were analysed and recovered by historicist revisionism and revivalism during the nineteenth century. The lack of a style of its century lead to eclecticism, a trend that involved a merging of diverse ornamental repertories. Accordingly, eclectic garden design employed historic styles of different origins. As the cities grew, suburban gardens were integrated within the urban sprawl. The Monforte Gardens in Valencia represent a relevant case study characteristic of nineteenth century major garden design and development transformations. Most significant are the design resources and strategies introduced in the original design by Sebastián Monléon and, subsequently by Javier de Winthuysen as this research —including a thorough redrawing of the garden layout— gives evidence of. The Monforte Gardens represent an eclectic urban gardening design example in which the different parts maintain their independence without losing an overall unitary concept. Although traditionally considered neoclassical gardens, this research argues they should be properly considered as eclectic romantic gardens.
在19世纪,历史主义修正主义和复兴主义分析和恢复了以往的历史风格。缺乏一个世纪的风格导致折衷主义,一种趋势,涉及到不同的装饰剧目的合并。因此,兼收并蓄的园林设计采用了不同起源的历史风格。随着城市的发展,郊区花园融入了城市的扩张之中。瓦伦西亚的蒙福特花园代表了19世纪主要花园设计和发展转型的相关案例研究特征。最重要的是设计资源和策略,在最初的设计中引入了Sebastián monlsamon,随后由Javier de Winthuysen进行了这项研究,包括对花园布局的彻底重新绘制,提供了证据。蒙福特花园代表了一个折衷的城市园艺设计的例子,其中不同的部分保持了它们的独立性,而又不失一个整体的统一概念。虽然传统上被认为是新古典主义花园,但这项研究认为,它们应该被恰当地视为折衷主义的浪漫花园。