Reflecting on eclecticism in garden heritage: The Monforte Gardens in Valencia as a case study

IF 0.1 0 ART
C. Marcos, Antonio Gómez-Gil, Sergio García-Doménech
{"title":"Reflecting on eclecticism in garden heritage: The Monforte Gardens in Valencia as a case study","authors":"C. Marcos, Antonio Gómez-Gil, Sergio García-Doménech","doi":"10.17811/li.29.2023.127-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precedent historic styles were analysed and recovered by historicist revisionism and revivalism during the nineteenth century. The lack of a style of its century lead to eclecticism, a trend that involved a merging of diverse ornamental repertories. Accordingly, eclectic garden design employed historic styles of different origins. As the cities grew, suburban gardens were integrated within the urban sprawl. The Monforte Gardens in Valencia represent a relevant case study characteristic of nineteenth century major garden design and development transformations. Most significant are the design resources and strategies introduced in the original design by Sebastián Monléon and, subsequently by Javier de Winthuysen as this research —including a thorough redrawing of the garden layout— gives evidence of. The Monforte Gardens represent an eclectic urban gardening design example in which the different parts maintain their independence without losing an overall unitary concept. Although traditionally considered neoclassical gardens, this research argues they should be properly considered as eclectic romantic gardens.","PeriodicalId":40698,"journal":{"name":"Lino - Revista Anual de Historia del Arte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lino - Revista Anual de Historia del Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17811/li.29.2023.127-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precedent historic styles were analysed and recovered by historicist revisionism and revivalism during the nineteenth century. The lack of a style of its century lead to eclecticism, a trend that involved a merging of diverse ornamental repertories. Accordingly, eclectic garden design employed historic styles of different origins. As the cities grew, suburban gardens were integrated within the urban sprawl. The Monforte Gardens in Valencia represent a relevant case study characteristic of nineteenth century major garden design and development transformations. Most significant are the design resources and strategies introduced in the original design by Sebastián Monléon and, subsequently by Javier de Winthuysen as this research —including a thorough redrawing of the garden layout— gives evidence of. The Monforte Gardens represent an eclectic urban gardening design example in which the different parts maintain their independence without losing an overall unitary concept. Although traditionally considered neoclassical gardens, this research argues they should be properly considered as eclectic romantic gardens.
园林遗产中的折衷主义反思:以瓦伦西亚的蒙福特花园为例
在19世纪,历史主义修正主义和复兴主义分析和恢复了以往的历史风格。缺乏一个世纪的风格导致折衷主义,一种趋势,涉及到不同的装饰剧目的合并。因此,兼收并蓄的园林设计采用了不同起源的历史风格。随着城市的发展,郊区花园融入了城市的扩张之中。瓦伦西亚的蒙福特花园代表了19世纪主要花园设计和发展转型的相关案例研究特征。最重要的是设计资源和策略,在最初的设计中引入了Sebastián monlsamon,随后由Javier de Winthuysen进行了这项研究,包括对花园布局的彻底重新绘制,提供了证据。蒙福特花园代表了一个折衷的城市园艺设计的例子,其中不同的部分保持了它们的独立性,而又不失一个整体的统一概念。虽然传统上被认为是新古典主义花园,但这项研究认为,它们应该被恰当地视为折衷主义的浪漫花园。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信